People who were injected with “vaccines” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) are increasingly being diagnosed with a new type of disease they are calling VEXAS syndrome, an autoinflammatory ailment that was first discovered in 2020 around the time Operation Warp Speed was launched by the Trump regime.
VEXAS syndrome, short for vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic syndrome, is said to be caused by mutations in the innate immune cells, as well as a somatic mutation in the UBA1 gene found on the X chromosome. Most inflammatory diseases, by the way, are caused by dysfunction that arises in adaptive immune cells.
“Somatic mutations cannot be inherited, meaning individuals acquire this mutation later in life,” explains The Epoch Times about the disease. “The mutation affects the stem cells in the bone marrow. The cells mature into specialized immune cells that circulate within the bloodstream.”
“Immune cells carrying the UBA1 mutation are highly inflammatory, and once enough of them accumulate, patients start developing symptoms.”
(Related: Be careful of the World Health Organization [WHO], which wants to control and rule over the world under the guise of protecting the world against COVID and other “threats.”)
Autoinflammation caused by COVID jabs
Back in April, French scientists reported on the case of a 76-year-old man who almost immediately after getting jabbed for COVID with Pfizer’s mRNA (modRNA) variety was diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome. His symptoms included tender bumps under the skin, rashes and purple spots on his limbs.
Skin problems are commonly reported among VEXAS patients, and the man was no exception. He was later determined by specialists to have the UBA1 mutation inherent to the disease.
“The rare incidence of VEXAS syndrome and the short delay of 3 days between vaccination and onset of symptoms were very suggestive of the vaccine’s role as a trigger,” the study authors, from Drôme Nord Hospitals, wrote.
Another patient, 72, developed similar symptoms, as well as a fever, fatigue, a cough and deep vein thrombosis. He was initially misdiagnosed with “long COVID,” only to later also show evidence of the same UBA1 mutation as the first patient.
“In my experience, it is unlikely that VEXAS syndrome could have been triggered by an infection or COVID-19 vaccination,” commented Dr. Sinisa Savic, an immunologist and associate clinical professor at the University of Leeds. “We know that as people age, they develop all sorts of mutations in the bone marrow … That is why VEXAS is largely found in the elderly population.”
Typically, VEXAS syndrome occurs in men over the age of 50. Both infections and vaccinations can trigger or worsen symptoms in people who are already on track to develop VEXAS syndrome.
“Anything that triggers an immune response can cause temporary worsening symptoms,” Dr. Savic added. “I don’t think there’s any particular argument about that.”
Among specialized immune cells, only innate immune cells have been found to carry the UBA1 mutation. Adaptive immune cells, meanwhile, form what is known as the “third” or last line of defense against disease, and these cells have not been found to carry the UBA1 mutation.
Dr. Savic believes that adaptive immune cells, including T and B cells, probably cannot survive long enough to become specialized if they carry the UBA1 mutation. Specialization of innate immune cells, conversely, appear to be less affected by the UBA1 mutation.
Both infections and vaccinations trigger responses in the immune system that are supposed to (in theory for vaccinations, anyway) form immune memory. This process does not occur in people with autoinflammatory conditions – in fact, an immune reaction can cause an imbalance that actually worsens a patient’s condition.
“This is the case with any autoimmune or inflammatory condition because the immune system tries to control itself, but if you’re then challenged by something else, then that level of control may be reduced,” Dr. Savic said.
A nationwide, register-based study out of Norway investigated the incidence of 18 adverse events in adolescents following administration of two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
The “vaccines” licensed in Norway were the Comirnaty (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech) and Spikevax (mRNA-1273, Moderna). These jabs were administered to children ages 12-19 as early as April 2021. The jabs were also administered to “high risk” children prior to April, but these children were excluded from the study. Nearly 500,000 children were included in the study.
Healthy Norwegian children suffer from Pfizer and Moderna’s failed COVID vaccine program
According to the study, these needless, fraudulent vaccines caused widespread damage to healthy adolescents. The most noteworthy adverse reactions were anaphylaxis, myocarditis, pericarditis, lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes) and appendicitis.
In a separate sub-analyses, researchers found that the COVID vaccines also caused an increase in epilepsy and convulsions in children. The vaccine damage was more widespread after the second dose, suggesting that cumulative toxicity may occur from one dose to the next.
The study excluded children who suffered from any of these health problems within four years prior to the COVID vaccine. This means that vaccine damage to unhealthy children was not even recorded in the study. Vaccine damage could be more widespread than what was recorded in this study, and the COVID jabs may have made unhealthy children worse off than before. Another limitation of the study was the omission of all children who were given three doses of the vaccine or children who received a non-mRNA vaccine. Also, any children who died during the study period were not included in the analysis.
Anaphylaxis TEN times higher in vaccinated children
The researchers used a self-controlled case series (SCCS) analysis and a model known as Poisson regression to look for increases in adverse events between the vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The unvaccinated children were used as a reference point in the study.
The researchers found that children inoculated with a COVID-19 vaccine were FIVE times more likely to suffer from an anaphylactic reaction (severe allergic shock). The risk increased to nearly TEN times after a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The risk window for anaphylactic shock is only two days after administration of the vaccine. This is a medical standard set by the World Health Organization (WHO). The risk of anaphylactic shock in children could be even higher if the risk window was expanded to 14 days after vaccination. With mRNA vaccines, the spike protein may not dissolve immediately; it may replicate and accumulate in distal organs (including the heart) several weeks after vaccination. This may cause other adverse reactions long after WHO’s standard two-day risk window.
Myocarditis SEVEN times higher in vaccinated children
The risk window for lymphadenopathy was 14 days after vaccination. Vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to suffer with swollen lymph nodes within this time period. This is an indicator of future cancer risk. Most shocking: vaccinated children were SEVEN times more likely to suffer myocarditis and/or pericarditis within the 28-day risk window after the second dose of the COVID vaccine. This is child abuse and medical malpractice, constituting crimes against children on a global scale.
In a supplementary analysis, the researchers found an increased risk of acute appendicitis following both the first and second dose of the COVID vaccine. There was also a pronounced increase in facial nerve palsy following the vaccine. Further sub-analyses found an increased risk of epilepsy and convulsions among 18- and 19-year-olds within the 28-day risk window of the second dose.
“Knowledge of potential post-vaccination adverse events is crucial to weigh benefits against risks, and for future vaccine recommendations,” wrote German Tapia, with the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. “The number of observed outcomes and statistically significant associations were generally low in this study, with some exceptions which should be further monitored.”
According to Elizabeth Arias, a researcher for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the U.S. life expectancy. “[It will take] some time before we’re back where we were in 2019,” she said.
The Daytona Beach News-Journal reported that according to CDC numbers, life expectancy for the entire U.S. was 77 years in 2020. However, this dropped to 76.4 years by 2021 – in time for the introduction of the COVID-19 injections that year.
One study by the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in California found that heart attack deaths climbed for all age groups during 2020 and 2021. But the biggest jump in heart attack deaths was seen in the group aged 25 to 44 at 29 percent.
COVID-19 injections shorten men’s lives by 24 years
The CDC’s own data also disclosed the true dangers of the vaccines. According to the Daily Expose, men injected with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could see as much as 24 years taken off their lifespan as a result.
The public health agency’s all-cause mortality data shows that each dose of the COVID-19 vaccine a person got raised their mortality rate by seven percent in 2022, compared to 2021. In other words, people injected with five doses were 35 percent more likely to die in 2022 than in 2021.
The Expose compared the COVID-19 vaccines to “slow-acting genetic poison” based on this data, given the fact that people do not appear to be recovering from the damage caused by earlier vaccines when it comes to excess mortality. It ultimately warned that a person injected with five doses would be 350 percent more likely to pass away in 2031, and a shocking 700 percent more likely to die in 2041 than an unvaccinated person.
Dr. Robert Califf, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), acknowledged this reduced life expectancy. “We are facing extraordinary headwinds in our public health with a major decline in life expectancy,” he wrote on X. “The major decline [of life expectancy] in the U.S. is not just a trend; I’d describe it as catastrophic.”
Not surprisingly, Califf stopped short of pinning the blame on the COVID-19 vaccines. Many of those who dare to suggest that the injections are responsible for excess deaths find themselves being censored.
In one instance, whistleblower Barry Young from New Zealand shared data from the country’s health agency that pointed to a strong link between the COVID-19 injections and excess mortality. According to the data he shared, the vaccines killed more than 10 million around the world.
But this revelation came with a steep price, as Young was arrested and now faces prison time. Nevertheless, the whistleblower said he shared the data as it blew his mind. He also wanted experts to analyze it and make people aware of what is happening.
Unexpected rise of ‘decidual cast’ searches after COVID vaccine launch
(Shutterstock)
In late January, 2021, just a month after the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines were granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020, a dramatic change in Google trend searches for “decidual cast” was evident.
Another surge in interest occurred in mid-June 2021, a month after the Pfizer vaccine was granted an expanded EUA for adolescents ages 12–15 years.
A decidual cast is defined as: “a large, intact piece of tissue that is passed through the vagina in one solid piece. It happens when the thick mucus lining of the uterus, called the decidua, sheds in the near exact shape of a uterine cavity, creating a triangular cast.”
Women began reporting unusual menstrual conditions on social media, including decidual cast shedding (DCS). This prompted several internet-based surveys, one of which was conducted by MyCycleStory.com.
While the literature contains only case reports of DCS, making the true prevalence difficult to measure, the condition is thought to be quite rare. Fewer than 40 cases have been published over the course of 100 years, usually related to ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, or prolonged progesterone use.
Even though the absolute number of cases is not that high, this unusually increased incidence over the background rate requires further study to ascertain the cause, and any other potential contributors related to the pandemic.
Studies Observe an Impact on Women’s Menstrual Cycle
In the United States Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), over 11,000 people self-reported a menstrual-related issue to the system following COVID-19 vaccination by April 2022. Events included heavy bleeding, irregular or delayed menstruation, oligomenorrhea, and amenorrhea.
Likewise, the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) yellow card surveillance scheme received 51,695 reports of menstrual disorders, including heavier or delayed periods, and unexpected bleeding, after the COVID-19 vaccine.
Findings from these databases suggested the possibility of negative impacts in menstrual cycles following COVID-19 vaccination. The relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle has been evaluated in several peer-reviewed studies.
In a large prospective cohort study conducted by Harvard, the Apple Women’s Health study, cycle length was manually tracked by 9,682 vaccinated and unvaccinated women who contributed 128,094 menstrual cycles, most of whom were vaccinated (88 percent) with Pfizer (55 percent) or Moderna (37 percent). Both cycle length and menses length were tracked prospectively to capture baseline, vaccination, and follow-up measures.
This study found that mean cycle length did increase following vaccination, particularly for women who received their vaccine during the first two weeks of the cycle, during the follicular phase.
Following the first dose in the follicular phase, the cycle length increased by 0.97 days, and following the second dose by 1.43 days. The cycle remained longer for one to two months after vaccination then returned to baseline.
Women who were vaccinated during the luteal phase tended to have a shorter cycle (-0.97 days).
Another prospective United States cohort study of nearly 4,000 women ages 18 to 45 years evaluated those with normal cycle lengths for three consecutive cycles before the first vaccine dose and three post-vaccine cycles (cycles 4, 5, and 6). Those who were unvaccinated were evaluated over six cycles during a similar time period.
The investigators computed within-individual changes in cycle length and menses length for cycles 1–3 and 4–6 then used mixed-effects models to compare differences in cycle and menses length between the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts.
The investigators found a mean 0.91 day increase in mean cycle length for women receiving the mRNA vaccine during their second vaccine cycle.
More vaccine recipients had a cycle length change of at least 8 days than unvaccinated (6.5 percent vs 4.6 percent, p=0.017). The longer vaccine cycles seemed to be concentrated among the 358 individuals who received both doses within a single cycle.
In this subgroup of vaccinated women, the unadjusted mean cycle length increase was 2.38 days and a substantially larger proportion (10.6 percent) had an increased cycle length of at least 8 days compared with the unvaccinated cohort (4.3 percent, P<.001).
The authors found no difference in menses length between cohorts.
A smaller Israel study among 219 women regularly tracking cycles also found changes in menstruation reported by almost 40 percent of vaccinated women. Parity (number of pregnancies) and medication use seemed to be risk factors for menstrual irregularities.
Half of those suffering from irregular bleeding were multiparous versus 31.5 percent multiparity among women with no irregular bleeding. Presence of comorbidities was also higher among women reporting irregular bleeding.
Interestingly, women reporting regular medication use were less likely to report irregular bleeding.
Another study included both a prospective cohort of 79 women and a retrospective cohort of 1273 women.
The study did also find a cycle length increase (delay to the next period) in women cycling spontaneously, suggesting that COVID-19 vaccination can lengthen the menstrual cycle.
However, no such change was observed among those using contraception, suggesting that this effect of COVID-19 vaccination may be mediated by ovarian hormones.
Source: Alvergne A, Woon EV and Male V (2022) Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the timing and flow of menstrual periods in two cohorts. Front. Reprod. Health 4:952976. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.952976
While several studies (references 9–14) have suggested that COVID-19 infection can cause changes in cycle length, the Nurses’ Health Study did not detect such an association following COVID-19 infection.
In this study, COVID-19 vaccination was associated with cycle length in the short term (within 6 months of vaccination), particularly among women with short, long, or irregular cycles prior to vaccination. Changes in cycle length were detected for both mRNA and adenovirus-vectored vaccines.
A plausible connection between COVID-19 vaccination–both mRNA and adenovirus-vectored vaccines–and increased cycle length appears reasonable. The effect seems most pronounced among women who have already had a child and who receive both doses within a single cycle, which is consistent with the survey study from Israel.
VAERS Data Suggests Increased Risks of Menstruation and Pregnancy Irregularities
A preprint study of adverse events (AE) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) compared the ratio of AEs due to COVID-19 vaccines to influenza vaccines. Thorp and colleagues gathered data on pregnancy and menstruation irregularities reported to VAERS between Jan. 1, 1998 to June 30, 2022.
The reporting ratio for AEs related to COVID-19 vaccines compared to influenza vaccines were at least double (and statistically significant at p<0.05) for the following:
menstrual abnormality (MA), miscarriage(M), fetal malformation (FM), fetal cardiac disorders (FCD), fetal growth abnormalities (FGA), fetal abnormal surveillance (FAS), fetal death/stillbirth (FS) and low amniotic fluid (LAF), which are listed In the below graph. A value greater than 1 implied that AE are reported more frequently with COVID-19 vaccine compared to influenza vaccines.
fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal cystic hygroma, fetal arrhythmia, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal vascular mal-perfusion, fetal placental thrombosis, which are not included in the Figure but also significantly increased.
It should be noted that for any VAERS study, this is a passive reporting system which relies on physician reporting and may not reflect the true rate for the AE. Detection of AEs may vary significantly depending on public awareness of the AE, thus sensitivity may be as low as 1% percent of all AEs or 67 percent. Self-reports by patients are not necessarily confirmed by a physician diagnosis. The VAERS database is appropriate for hypothesis-generation, but population-based studies are needed to understand true incidence and causation.
Global relative rates of AE reports after COVID-19 vaccines versus those after influenza vaccines by dose given. Source of preprint: James A. Thorp, Claire Rogers, Michael P. Deskevich, Stewart Tankersley, Albert Benavides, Megan D. Redshaw and Peter A. McCullough. COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function. Link of preprint.
Canadian Study Observed Increased Risks of Severe Adverse Events During Pregnancy
A Canadian prospective observational cohort study of COVID-19 vaccines, published in Lancet Infectious Disease pregnancy, evaluated the frequency of significant health events among 5625 pregnant / vaccinated, compared with 339 pregnant / unvaccinated and 185 735 nonpregnant / vaccinated controls, resulting a total of 191,360 women ages 15–49 years included.
The data were collected by survey with follow-up phone calls to those reporting any medically attended event.
The pregnant vaccinated females had a 4.4-fold (95 percent CI 2.4-8.3) increased risk of a severe health event after dose two of Moderna compared to pregnant unvaccinated females; this association was not seen for those vaccinated with Pfizer.
The dose of Moderna vaccine (100mcg) is more than 3 fold that of Pfizer (30mcg) in adults, which may well explain the different results among vaccine brands.
Sadarangani M, Soe P, Shulha HP, Valiquette L, Vanderkooi OG, Kellner JD, Muller MP, Top KA, Isenor JE, McGeer A, Irvine M, De Serres G, Marty K, Bettinger JA; Canadian Immunization Research Network. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: a Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Nov;22(11):1553-1564. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00426-1.
Miscarriage or stillbirth was the most frequently reported adverse pregnancy outcome. Both miscarriage and stillbirth describe pregnancy loss, but they differ according to when the loss occurs. In the United States, a miscarriage is usually defined as loss of a baby before the 20th week of pregnancy, and a stillbirth is loss of a baby at or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
It was reported at similar rates between control (2.1 percent of 339) and vaccinated groups within seven days after dose one of any mRNA vaccine (1.5 percent of 5,597).
Other rare adverse pregnancy outcomes such as vaginal bleeding, abnormal fetal heart rate, and reduced fetal movement were increased slightly within seven days following any mRNA vaccination compared to control.
There were an additional individuals who reported experiencing miscarriage or stillbirth between the first COVID-19 vaccine dose and completion of the second (dose two) survey (up to 10 days after dose two), however the precise timing of these events relative to vaccination was not known.
Sadarangani M, Soe P, Shulha HP, Valiquette L, Vanderkooi OG, Kellner JD, Muller MP, Top KA, Isenor JE, McGeer A, Irvine M, De Serres G, Marty K, Bettinger JA; Canadian Immunization Research Network. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: a Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Nov;22(11):1553-1564. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00426-1.
Impact on Fertility
The impact of vaccination and infection on ovarian function and fertility is a heavy topic. The key findings from a number of peer-reviewed publications and preprints has been summarized here.
Reduced Total Fertility Rate (TFR)
There is a population-wide change in fertility after vaccination campaigns. In a new preprint, the total fertility rate (TFR) in Sweden and Germany was trended over time, from early in the pandemic through 2022.
Many countries noticed a fertility decline early in the pandemic, but Germany and Sweden were largely unaffected. These countries, however, recently experienced a reduction in the TFR.
The seasonally-adjusted TFR in Germany declined 14 percent from 1.5-1.6 in 2021 to 1.3-1.4 in early 2022. A similar trend was seen in Sweden, with a 10 percent decline from 1.7 to 1.5-1.6.
The authors note that the sharp declines in TFR align with the onset of vaccination campaigns precisely nine months prior. The authors speculate that concerns about vaccine safety during conception and pregnancy might have caused women to hold off on starting their family until after vaccination.
Further population-based longitudinal research is necessary to detect any slight but significant effects of vaccination on fertility.
Source: Martin Bujard and Gunnar Andersson. Fertility declines near the end of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of the 2022 birth declines in Germany and Sweden. Link of the source. Source: Martin Bujard and Gunnar Andersson. Fertility declines near the end of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of the 2022 birth declines in Germany and Sweden. Link of the source.
In the systematic review, 29 studies conducted in Israel, United States, Russia, China, Italy, North America, and Turkey were included.
The pregnancy rates were observed to decline in the vaccinated group by 15 percent for biochemical pregnancy rate and by 4.3 percent for clinical pregnancy rate, in a comparison to the unvaccinated group.
It is reported that both declines did not reach a statistical difference among vaccinated and not vaccinated groups. However, a clinical meaningful decline is not necessarily to be statistically significant. And whether to achieve a statistical difference or not may be confounded by the power of studies.
Furthermore, meta-analyses were performed for pre- and post-vaccination sperm progressive motility (44 percent versus 43 percent, p = 0.07).
Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH)
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) has been used as a marker to assess ovarian function in women and it impacts fertility. It gives an estimate of ovarian reserve–how many eggs are remaining in the ovaries. Older women normally have lower levels than younger women.
In a prospective study conducted in Israel among 129 women who received two mRNA vaccines, the change in AMH was assessed via baseline and 90-day measurements, pre- and post-vaccination.
In this study, no change was detected in AMH levels pre- vs post-vaccination (5.3 vs 5.3 µg/l, respectively).
The authors concluded that while this study was limited to a three-month followup after the first vaccination, there did not appear to be any effect of mRNA vaccination on ovarian function.
Another similar but smaller Israeli prospective study among 31 women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment found that AMH remained stable pre- and post-mRNA vaccination.
There are limitations of the AMH studies. First, there is no control group and only self control was used.
Second, serum AMF levels are known to be affected by multiple factors including obesity, vitamin D levels, oral contraceptive therapies, genes (BRCA mutations contributing to breast and ovarian cancers), chemotherapy, common ovulatory disorders (polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS), and history of ovarian surgery. Any potential changes in common confounding factors for serum AMF levels (body weight, contraceptives, vitamin D levels) in these subjects should be analyzed and reported.
In a retrospective study including 200 women undergoing IVF, no difference in fertility outcomes was detected, including oocyte retrieval, fertilization and pregnancy rates, and embryo quality.
Although this study found similar pregnancy rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated (32.8 percent and 33.1 percent, respectively), it would have required a much larger sample size to detect a small but meaningful difference.
A sample of at least 985 participants would be needed to detect a smaller 5 percent difference in pregnancy rates. In other words, this study was underpowered to detect a meaningful difference of reduction in pregnancy rates.
In another retrospective cohort study of 222 vaccinated and 983 unvaccinated women who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation, no effect of vaccination was found for the primary outcome, fertilization rate, nor any of the secondary outcomes, including eggs retrieved, mature oocytes retrieved, mature oocyte ratio, blastulation rate, or euploid rate.
For 214 vaccinated and 733 unvaccinated women undergoing frozen-thawed euploid transfer, the adjusted analysis found no significant association for vaccination and the primary outcome, clinical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.79, 95 percent CI 0.54-1.16), nor any of the secondary outcomes: pregnancy (aOR 0.88, 95 percent CI 0.58-1.33), ongoing pregnancy (aOR 0.90, 95 percent CI 0.61-1.31), biochemical pregnancy loss (aOR 1.21, 95 percent CI 0.69-2.14), or clinical pregnancy loss (aOR 1.02, 95 percent CI 0.51-2.06).
However, these confidence intervals are large and the sample size insufficient to rule out a small but clinically meaningful difference in outcomes.
A small cohort study of 32 individuals (9 recovered SARS-CoV-2 positive, 9 vaccinated, 14 uninfected/unvaccinated) found no differences in follicular function and oocyte quality.
Together, these studies suggest that any effect of either infection or vaccination on fertility will be difficult to detect unless studies are designed with sufficient statistical power geared to expected changes in primary and secondary endpoints.
A decrease of 0.3 percent in the vaccinated group is 30 fewer pregnancies per 10,000 women, thus any study designed to detect a difference this slight would need to enroll 770,000 women.
Some might suggest powering phase III clinical trials to detect fertility impact is impractical, but certainly intentional post-marketing surveillance when vaccine uptake is in the millions is possible.
Second, the spike protein induced local and systemic inflammation might impact the signaling between the brain and ovaries (the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal or HPA axis), resulting in hormone imbalances, prolongation of follicular recruitment during the early part of the cycle, and lengthening the cycle.
Third, ovarian inflammation may also be caused by lipid nanoparticles (LNP) effects on hormones, an autoimmune reaction with anti-syncytin antibodies at the endometrium, or inflammatory processes triggered by the spike protein either from the vaccine or infection.
Fourth, abnormal bleeding can be caused by abnormal local clotting in the endometrium during the period.
Based on the evidences of spike protein’s domino-like activities related to abnormal blood clotting, the potential role of spike protein originating from SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 vaccine in the abnormal bleeding of vaccinated women is likely to contribute to the surge of increased DCS and menstrual disorders during COVID pandemic, amongst other dysregulated immune and hormone mediated pathologies.
Impact on Lactation: Antibodies Detected in Milk and Symptoms Reported
A prospective cohort study included 50 lactating women who received mRNA vaccines with both blood and milk samples prior to their first vaccination dose, immediately prior to dose two, and four to ten weeks after their second dose.
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies were measured in each sample, and blood samples were collected from a subset of infants whose mothers were vaccinated while lactating.
After vaccination, levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM significantly increased in maternal plasma and there was significant transfer of IgA and IgG antibodies to milk.
Self-reported symptoms (fever, chills, headache, joint pain, muscle aches or body aches, and fatigue or tiredness) were reported by significantly more participants after the 2nd dose than after the 1st dose.
Two mothers reported slightly less milk production in the first 24-72 hours after vaccine doses.
Twelve percent of infants were reported with at least one symptom after the 1st maternal vaccine dose, which are primarily gastrointestinal symptoms and sleep changes.
The study lacked an unvaccinated control and these changes in infant behaviors are common; future studies should evaluate these reports.
The study also collected symptoms following vaccination and noted that more vaccine-related side effects may be experienced by those receiving Moderna compared to Pfizer, which should be again attributed to the higher dose of Moderna.
Natural Immunity Impact on Lactation
Finally, a study of mothers recently recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection evaluated both antibodies and T cells in breastmilk. Because only about one in four women elect to be vaccinated during pregnancy, the ability of the mother to confer passive immunity to her infant through breast milk is an important question to assess.
In this small study of 30 lactating women, both antibody and T cell parameters were evaluated in milk samples collected at 12 timepoints over the course of a month.
A second set of samples were donated four months after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test to test durability of the immune markers.
The study confirms that women recently infected with SARS-CoV-2 have antibodies in their milk which can neutralize the spike complex. The milk is also enriched with mucosal memory T cells.
This study may be the first to demonstrate that breast milk from mothers who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection contains long-lasting IgA and IgG antibody responses and that breastmilk can provide passive protection to the infant via mucosal-homing, effector-memory T cells which can seed the infant gastrointestinal tract.
Summary of Key Observations
Based on the available data collected from clinical studies, vaccine safety databases or surveys, a summary of key observations include:
Concerns about the negative impacts of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle have been validated by peer-reviewed research.
The cycle length appears to increase following both mRNA and adenovirus-vectored vaccination, particularly for those women who received both doses within a single cycle (21-28 day interval), and those who were vaccinated during the follicular phase.
VAERS data suggests increased risks of menstruation and pregnancy irregularities. A Canadian study also observed increased risks of severe adverse events during pregnancy associated with the Moderna vaccine.
Sharp decline of total fertility rates were reported in Germany and Sweden in 2022. A 15 percent decline in the biochemical pregnancy rate and a 4.3 percent decline in the clinical pregnancy rate were reported, though AMU studies did not detect any meaningful change.
Spike protein induced inflammation, immune disorders, and hormone mediated mechanisms of action as well as abnormal clotting cascades and overactivation have been correlated to these clinical adverse events.
COVID vaccine induced antibodies have been detected in milk, as well as symptoms among mothers and infants post vaccination are reported.
The effect has been observed across spike protein-based COVID-19 vaccines regardless of vaccine type. The higher dose mRNA vaccine (Moderna) is associated with a higher likelihood of these events than the lower dose mRNA vaccine (Pfizer).
These findings strongly suggest that more rapid and intentional post-marketing surveillance is necessary to detect impacts of vaccination on menstrual, pregnancy, and lactation events.
The CDC continues to recommend vaccination and boosters for all individuals over 5 years of age despite a lack of evidence regarding an incremental reduction in serious COVID-19 illness among those younger than 40 years of age.
To address vaccine hesitancy, public health officials and regulatory agencies must demonstrate that individual concerns are addressed and that clinical trials are designed to detect rare adverse events in otherwise healthy, young individuals prior to issuing broad recommendations.
A phased trial rollout which prioritizes enrollment of higher risk individuals and follows them for clinically important endpoints, such as hospitalization and death, would allow rapid deployment of lifesaving vaccines while minimizing harm to those at low risk of serious illness.
Canadian state news outlet CTV Newsis reporting that the number-one killer of people in Alberta right now are “ill-defined and unknown causes,” which of course means Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines.”
The collective of data from 2021 shows that compared to every other primary cause of death, ill-defined and unknown causes (3,362) topped them all, followed by:
Dementia (2,135)
“COVID-19” (1,950)
Chronic ischemic heart disease (1,939)
Malignant neoplasms of trachea, bronchus and lung (1.552)
Acute myocardial infarction (1,075)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1,028)
Diabetes mellitus (728)
Stroke (612)
Accidental poisoning by and exposure to drugs and other substances (604)
As you will notice, nowhere in this list are Fauci Flu shots even mentioned. That is because the Canadian government, like most governments, refuses to acknowledge any link between the jabs and excess deaths – which are off the charts.
As we reported earlier this year, the government of Alberta has been going out of its way to scrub any trace of cause and effect between the jabs and the sharp increase in deaths the province has been seeing ever since the launch of Operation Warp Speed.
Up until 2021, dementia was the leading cause of death in Alberta for six straight years
Since 2016, dementia held the top spot as the number-one cause of death in Alberta – that is, until Donald Trump released his “vaccines,” which have been killing people left and right ever since.
“I think it’s probably multifactorial, so there’s probably many things playing into that,” says Dr. Daniel Gregson, an associate professor in the Cumming School of Medicine at the University of Calgary who specializes in infectious diseases and microbiology, deflecting from Fauci Flu shots as the cause of all these deaths.
“We have this impression of surviving COVID and that’s the end of it, and that’s not necessarily true,” he added in a statement to CTV, the suggestion being that the alleged “virus” is making some kind of comeback – even though covid is listed as the number-three cause of death in Alberta.
According to Gregson, people who previously tested “positive” for covid could now die at any moment from a number of things, including heart disease, stroke and pulmonary embolisms – all things that are caused by the injections, it turns out.
“We do expect that there will be deaths that aren’t directly related to COVID, but indirectly related to COVID to occur after the diagnosis in patients after the first month of infection,” he further said.
“One would expect that some of those patients are going to survive the COVID and then die at home from other complications.”
Both Alberta Health and the province’s medical examiner’s office are likewise playing dumb about the issue, pretending as though all these excess deaths are just one big mystery that cannot be solved.
“COVID still is quite high up there as we expected,” Gregson further added, admitting that the jabs are not “working” to save lives as expected.
“Unfortunately, we haven’t been able to actually eliminate COVID deaths in the province, despite our availability of vaccines. So, that’s a bit disappointing.”
Amazingly, Gregson went on to suggest that a lack of lockdowns could be responsible for all these excess deaths.
“I think the fact that that number (covid deaths) is not in the top spot is essentially a medical miracle in us being able to get out vaccines in less than 18 months to the average person in Canada,” he further stated in all seriousness.
In other words, Gregson wants Canadians to believe that the jabs are responsible for keeping covid in the number-three top killer position as opposed to the number-one position – even though the number one position is the injections.
An embalmer with decades of experience said in a recent interview that for more than a year he has found “long, fibrous blood clots” in the bodies of some deceased people who got a COVID-19 vaccine.
According to a report by The Exposé, board-certified funeral director and embalmer Richard Hirschman revealed his observations in an interview with Dr. Jane Ruby, “a medical professional with expertise in pharmaceutical drug development and over 20 years of experience in regulatory processes for FDA drug approval,” the site reported.
Specifically, Hirschman reports finding “arteries and veins filled with unnatural blood clot combinations” that also contain “strange fibrous materials” that have completely filled up the vascular systems of many people who have died during the pandemic and after vaccines became widely used.
In his interview with Ruby, Hirschman not only reported that he has never seen anything like what he now increasingly finds, but that he has discussed his findings with other embalmers and many of them have encountered the same phenomenon, The Exposé reported.
“Hirschman stated these clots or worm-like structures appear closely to vaccinated blood under a microscope, but he has never seen anything of these sizes before,” the outlet reported, adding that the embalmer states he began encountering the phenomenon of long, stretchy, fibrous clots in November 2020.
Eventually, he reported finding the clots in as many as 50 percent of deceased people he was embalming, but today that figure is closer to 80 percent, the outlet reported, citing Hirschman’s claims in his interview with Ruby.
He also said that he was able to confirm that some of those deceased with these blood clots had indeed received the Covid-19 vaccines, but he could not confirm all of them were vaccinated or what specifically is causing this increase in these usually long blood clots in the circulatory systems of the deceased.
Hirschman added that he has seen an increase in deaths resulting from heart attacks and strokes coming to his table. With increasing numbers of blood clots like these, that is no surprise.
He went on to say that other professionals in his field are becoming “nervous” about what they increasingly are finding as well, especially when they related it to the increasing number of people dying after getting COVID vaccines.
“If this is caused by the vaccine and my gut is telling me it is, I can’t prove that, but if this is caused by the vaccine, imagine the amount of people that will be dying in the future because people cannot live with this kind of substance floating around in their vessels,” he told Ruby.
He went on to say he thinks it is “amazing” how so many people are dying from heart attacks and strokes of late, adding: “If one of these small fibrous tissues gets up into the brain, you’re going to have a stroke.
“If it gets into your heart, it’s going to lead you to a heart attack,” he added.
After first noting an uptick in November 2020 of people he had embalmed with what he termed “worms” in their bloodstream, Hirschman says he began to keep track of the numbers and documented his findings.
In January alone, of the 35 people he has embalmed, he estimated that at least 20 of them had fibrous anomalies in their bloodstream.
“Needless to say, this should be investigated immediately, if not for the respect of the deceased, then to at least rule out if these long, fibrous blood clots are indeed a physiological result of the Covid-19 vaccines,” he told Ruby, adding that if the vaccines are not responsible, obviously something else is occurring.
When the jab’s messenger RNA (mRNA) spike proteins are injected into the body, they travel to the liver and trigger DNA located inside the nuclei of liver cells. This increases the expression of the LINE-1 gene that makes mRNA.
After this is complete, the mRNA leaves the nuclei and enters the cytoplasm of cells, translating into LINE-1 protein. A segment of this protein called the open reading frame-1 or ORF-1 then goes back into the nuclei of liver cells where it attaches to the jab’s mRNA and reverse transcribes it into spike DNA.
Reverse transcription is when DNA is made from RNA, by the way. The normal transcription process, on the other hand, involves a portion of the DNA serving as a template to make an mRNA molecule inside the nuclei.
“In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro,” the researchers wrote in a paper that was published in the journal Current Issues of Molecular Biology.
“BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 [hours] after BNT162b2 exposure,” they added, BNT162b2 being another name for the Pfizer-BioNTech injection the two companies are calling a “vaccine” – another name for the jab is Comirnaty.
CDC lied about mRNA shots, claimed they would never enter cell nuclei
The entire process described above occurs in just six hours. The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA injection converts into artificial DNA during this time, which contradicts what the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long said about how the jabs supposedly work.
“The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells,” still reads the CDC’s web page entitled, “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines.”
This is the first time, by the way, that researchers have shown either in vitro or in a petri dish how mRNA injections convert into DNA on a human liver cell line. Again, the “experts” and “fact checkers” continue to falsely claim that this is not possible.
“COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” the CDC still claims about both the mRNA injections and the viral vector alternatives from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca.
Ever since the shots were launched by Donald Trump under Operation Warp Speed, the “authorities” have insisted that the contents of the shots are quickly discarded by the body once antibodies are produced, which is a lie.
“These vaccines deliver genetic material that instructs cells to begin making spike proteins found on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 to produce an immune response,” reports The Epoch Times.
A Pfizer spokesperson responded to the new study’s revelations by claiming falsely that its mRNA injection “does not alter the DNA sequence of a human cell.”
“It only presents the body with the instructions to build immunity,” this person still claims.
Another thing the Swedish study revealed is that mRNA spike proteins on the surface of liver cells could cause autoimmune hepatitis.
“[T]here [have] been case reports on individuals who developed autoimmune hepatitis after BNT162b2 vaccination,” the study authors wrote.
They also presented the first reported case of a healthy 35-year-old female who developed autoimmune hepatitis one week after her first “dose” of Pfizer’s mRNA injection.
There is a possibility, the authors further wrote, that “spike-directed antibodies induced by vaccination may also trigger autoimmune conditions in predisposed individuals.”
The latest news about Pfizer’s mRNA injection can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.
For more than a year, “health experts” and “fact checkers” have claimed that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” do not alter human DNA, but a new study has confirmed otherwise.
Published in the journal Current Issues of Molecular Biology, the paper explains that Pfizer’s messenger RNA (mRNA) injection – and probably Moderna’s, too – invades the liver and converts to synthetic DNA.
Entitled, “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line,” the study reveals that mRNA injections do, in fact, integrate into human cellular DNA.
“This means that a shot of the Pfizer vaccine, taken even once, permanently changes the DNA of affected cells,” reports Igor Chudov from The Covid World.
But wait: the Australian government’s Department of Health published a report at WebMD claiming that Covid-19 “vaccines” cannot alter DNA. In response to the question: “Is it true? Can COVID-19 vaccines alter my DNA?” the Australian DoH declared the following:
“No, COVID-19 vaccines do not alter your DNA.”
Whoops.
Another report by a “doctor” asked what is the “Chance That COVID-19 Vaccines Are Gene Therapy?” Her answer? “Zero.”
Whoops again.
“Covid Vaccines Don’t Alter Your DNA – They Help Choose Cells To Strengthen Your Immune Response,” reads another false headline that was widely circulated.
Then we have a “fact check” that declared: “Controversial MIT study does not show that mRNA vaccines alter DNA.”
All of this was fake news, and it was circulated across the globe. Again and again, governments and corporate-controlled media outlets have repeated the lie that Fauci Flu shots are completely safe and in no way impact human DNA, to the detriment of public health.
“What the article shows is that in vitro, using a human liver cell line, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine uses a natural reverse transcriptase enzyme called LINE-1, and the genetic code of the vaccine is reverse transcribed into the DNA,” reported The Covid World.
“It also explains that vaccine mRNA actually does travel to the liver as one of the preferred sites (the other sites, as we heard, are ovaries and more).”
Under normal circumstances, human cell nuclei, where the DNA is located, express certain DNA code based on cellular conditions. They regularly produce natural, human messenger RNA, which travels outside the nuclei to perform various functions.
These functions include the growth and repair of muscle cells, brain cells and more. This overall process is known as transcription.
Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) shots engage a process known as reverse transcription that, prior to their release, was never even thought to be possible.
Reverse transcription involves moving genetic code from RNA back into what The Covid World calls the “sacred cellular nucleus” in order to recode natural DNA with new synthetic programming. This is what these injections do.
“Eventually, scientists realized that it is possible under various conditions,” The Covid World explains about reverse transcription. “For example, the HIV RNA virus is able to do so and it reprograms our DNA to produce copies of it. HIV is the virus that causes AIDS.”
The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has a cancer code that matches a 2017 Moderna patent
We warned about all this last April following the publishing of the MIT study that the “fact checkers” claimed had been debunked.
The “experts” largely mocked the idea that mRNA injections have the ability to re-encode human DNA, only to now be exposed as frauds. It is an undeniable fact that mRNA shots permanently damage human DNA, as was demonstrated in vitro in a human liver cell line.
In order to engage reverse transcription, enzymes known as “reverse transcriptases” are needed. One of them is called LINE-1 and according to the new study, Pfizer’s mRNA shots produce it.
Just to be sure that they did not pick up RNA instead, the researchers tested for alterations to the DNA. From this they identified a slew of genetic changes that occurred due to the Pfizer shot.
“The Pfizer mRNA vaccine changes our genetic code that determines how our organisms operate, that you inherited from your mom and dad,” Chudov explains in simpler terms. “Now your DNA was changed from what your mom and dad gave you, by adding a little mysterious ‘edit’ from Pfizer.”
“Your organism acts in accordance with your DNA program, and now, well, the program has been hacked and modified by Pfizer.”
Another thing that has been revealed is the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein contains a cancer code that just so happens to match a 2017 Moderna patent under the identifier 9,587,003.
Chudov says it is imperative that scientists learn the implications of the reverse transcription caused by both the Pfizer-BioNTech and the Moderna jab – and probably the viral vector alternative “vaccines” from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca as well.
“Of particular interest is whether this mRNA-induced reverse transcription affects the ‘germ-line,’ such as eggs and sperm cells, and whether it also affects the fetus of pregnant mothers,” Chudov writes, pointing to an anonymous 4chan post from December 2020 that warned about all this long before any of this was revealed.
One person responding to the study and its findings wrote: “Zombie code active!!”
“There will be huge consequences for this,” wrote someone else. “Man is now a transhuman virus hybrid!”
“The consequences of this vaxx will boggle the mind for years to come,” suggested another about the soon-to-come horror show of the “fully vaccinated.”
More of the latest news about Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injections can be found at Genocide.news.
ARYAN'S BLOG 