Neuralink’s Brain Chip Implant Marks New Era in Human-Computer Synergy


Summary: Elon Musk announces the first human has been successfully implanted with Neuralink’s brain chip, named Telepathy, aiming to allow severe physically disabled individuals to control devices via thought. The FDA-approved trial focuses on the implant’s potential for movement control, with the patient reportedly recovering well and showing promising initial results.

Neuralink’s mission extends from providing immediate medical aids to enhancing human cognitive and sensory capabilities in the long run. This breakthrough triggers a spectrum of scenarios from optimistic widespread adoption to concerns over technological, ethical, and societal implications.

Key Facts:

  1. The first human trial of Neuralink’s brain-computer interface implant has begun, following FDA approval in 2023.
  2. The implant, named Telepathy, is designed to help those with severe physical disabilities control digital devices through thought.
  3. The project’s future ranges from potential medical applications to broader cognitive enhancements, amidst varying societal, ethical, and technological challenges.

Source: The Conversation

The first human has received a Neuralink brain chip implant, according to co-founder Elon Musk. The neurotechnology company has started its first human trial since receiving approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2023.

The trial’s focus is on an implant that could potentially allow people with severe physical disabilities to control digital devices using their thoughts. The study involves implanting a brain chip — called a brain-computer interface implant — in the region of the brain that controls movement intention.

Musk has said the patient who received the implant — fittingly named Telepathy — is “recovering well” and that “initial results show promising neuron spike detection.” No other details about the trial have been provided yet.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/z7o39CzHgug?feature=oembedCredit: Neuralink

This development is more than just a technical milestone; it represents a major leap in potential human-computer interaction, raising important questions about the integration of advanced technology with the human body and mind.

Neuralink’s mission

Neuralink’s stated mission is to “create a generalized brain interface to restore autonomy to those with unmet medical needs today and unlock human potential tomorrow.” This mission communicates two key approaches.

In the short term, the focus will be on individuals with medical needs. The long-term vision extends far beyond this, alluding to a goal of augmenting human potential. This suggests Neuralink envisions a future where its technology transcends medical use and becomes a tool for cognitive and sensory enhancement in the general population.

The evolution of Neuralink presents a range of possible future scenarios. The first scenario envisions successful trials leading to adoption in niche markets, signifying a breakthrough but with restricted scope.

The second, more optimistic scenario, involves widespread acceptance after successful human trials, with the potential to revolutionize our interaction with technology. And the third — a more pessimistic view — considers the venture’s failure, driven by many societal, technological, legal and medical factors.

The realistic scenario

In the most realistic scenario, Neuralink is expected to achieve success by focusing on medical applications for individuals with severe disabilities. This targeted approach is likely to resonate with consumers in need of life-changing technologies, which will drive early adoption within this specific demographic.

In this case, wider acceptance from the broader consumer base will hinge on various factors, including the technology’s perceived usefulnessprivacy implications and the overall risk-benefit perception.

Socially, Neuralink’s trajectory will be significantly influenced by public and ethical discussions. Issues surrounding data security, long-term health implications and equitable access will likely dominate public discourse.

Widespread acceptance of Neuralink’s technology will depend on its medical efficacy and safety, combined with Neuralink’s ability to address ethical concerns and gain public trust.

The optimistic scenario

In the optimistic scenario, Neuralink’s technology transcends its initial medical applications and integrates into everyday life. This scenario envisions a future where the technology’s benefits are clearly demonstrated and recognized beyond its medical use, generating interest across various sectors of society.

Consumer interest in Neuralink would extend beyond those with medical needs, driven by the appeal of enhanced cognitive abilities and sensory experiences. As people become more familiar with the technology, concerns about invasiveness and data privacy may decrease, especially if Neuralink can provide robust safety and security assurances.

From a societal standpoint, the optimistic scenario sees Neuralink as a catalyst for positive change. The technology could bridge gaps in human potential, offering new ways of interaction and communication.

Although ethical concerns would still exist, the potential benefits in education, workforce productivity and overall quality of life could outweigh them. Regulatory bodies might adopt more accommodating policies, influenced by public enthusiasm and the technology’s track record in improving lives.

This shows a head and a computer chip.
From a societal standpoint, the optimistic scenario sees Neuralink as a catalyst for positive change.

In this scenario, Neuralink becomes a symbol of human advancement, seamlessly integrating into daily life and opening new possibilities in human-machine interaction.

Its success would set a precedent for other technologies at the intersection of biology and technology, like gene editing technologies  and bioelectronic medicine, paving the way for a future where such integrations are the norm.

The pessimistic scenario

In the pessimistic scenario, Neuralink will face significant challenges that hinder its widespread adoption and success. This scenario considers the possibility of the technology failing to meet the high expectations set for it, either due to technological limitations, safety concerns or ethical dilemmas.

From a technological standpoint, the complexity of interfacing directly with the human brain could be more complex than anticipated, leading to underwhelming performance or reliability issues.

Physical and psychological safety concerns might also be more significant than initially thought, with potential long-term health implications that could deter both consumers and medical professionals.

The invasive nature of the technology and privacy concerns related to brain data could lead to widespread public apprehension. This skepticism could be compounded if early applications of the technology are perceived as benefiting only a select few, exacerbating social inequalities.

Ethically, the prospect of brain-computer interfaces could raise questions about human identityautonomy and the nature of consciousness. These concerns might fuel public opposition, leading to stringent regulatory restrictions and slowing down research and development.

In this scenario, Neuralink’s ambitious vision might be curtailed by a combination of technological hurdles, public mistrust, ethical controversies and regulatory challenges, ultimately leading to the project’s stagnation or decline.

While Neuralink presents numerous possibilities, its journey isn’t merely about technological advancement. The outcome of this venture holds key implications for the future of neural interfaces and our understanding of human capabilities, underscoring the need for a thoughtful approach to such innovation.

Neuralink Announces First Brain Chip Implant in Humans.


Summary: Elon Musk’s Neuralink has successfully implanted its brain-computer interface in a human. The procedure marks a significant milestone for the company.

The clinical trial aims to enable individuals with paralysis to control devices through their thoughts.

Key Facts:

  1. First Human Implant: Neuralink achieved a major breakthrough by successfully implanting its brain-computer interface in a human patient.
  2. Targeted Participants: The clinical trial focuses on patients with quadriplegia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) aged 22 and above, offering hope for those with severe movement impairments.
  3. Wireless Brain-Computer Interface: Neuralink’s technology aims to empower individuals to control devices using their thoughts, potentially revolutionizing the lives of people with paralysis.

Source: Neuroscience News

Elon Musk announced on X this afternoon that the first human has received a brain implant from his Neuralink company. The procedure is believed to have taken place on Sunday.

Musk added in his post that the initial results show promising neural spike detection.

This shows a head.
Last year, the FDA provided clearance for the company to embark on human testing for its neuralchip technology.

Last year, the FDA provided clearance for the company to embark on human testing for its neural-chip technology.

In September 2023, Neuralink announced it was opening recruitment for its first human clinical trials of its implant. Patients with quadriplegia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) over the age of 22 are eligible to participate in the ongoing trials.

The trial is being overseen by an independent institutional review board.

The goal of the study is to assess the functionality of its wireless brain-computer interface for those with movement impairments or paralysis of all four limbs to control devices with their thoughts.

Elon Musk announces first Neuralink wireless brain chip implant


CEO of Tesla, Chief Engineer of SpaceX and CTO of X Elon Musk speaks during the New York Times annual DealBook summit on 29 November 2023 in New York City, US

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has claimed his Neuralink company has successfully implanted one of its wireless brain chips in a human.

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, he said “promising” brain activity had been detected after the procedure and the patient was “recovering well”.

The company’s goal is to connect human brains to computers to help tackle complex neurological conditions.

A number of rival firms have already implanted similar devices.

“For any company producing medical devices, the first test in humans is a significant milestone,” said Professor Anne Vanhoestenberghe of King’s College London.

“For the brain chip implant community, we must place this news in the context that whilst there are many companies working on exciting products, there are only a few other companies who have implanted their devices in humans, so Neuralink has joined a rather small group.”

However, she also suggested there needed to be a note of caution as “true success” could only be evaluated in the long-term.

“We know Elon Musk is very adept at generating publicity for his company,” she added.

Among the other companies to make similar advances in the field is the École Polytechnique Fédérale in Lausanne (EPFL), in Switzerland, which has successfully enabled a paralysed man to walk just by thinking.

That was achieved by putting electronic implants on his brain and spine which wirelessly communicate thoughts to his legs and feet.

Details of the breakthrough were published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature in May 2023.

There has been no independent verification of Mr Musk’s claims, nor has Neuralink provided any information about the procedure he says has taken place.

BBC News has approached both Neuralink and the US’s medical regulator, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for comment.

Neuralink has been criticised in the past, with Reuters reporting in December 2022 that the company engaged in testing which resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,500 animals, including sheep, monkeys and pigs.

In July 2023, the head of the US Department of Agriculture – which investigates animal welfare concerns – said it had not found any violations of animal research rules at the firm.

However, a separate investigation by the agency is ongoing.

Mr Musk’s company was given permission to test the chip on humans by the FDA in May 2023.

That gave the green light for the start of the six-year study during which a robot is being used to surgically place 64 flexible threads, thinner than a human hair, on to a part of the brain that controls “movement intention”, according to Neuralink.

The company says that these threads allow its experimental implant – powered by a battery that can be charged wirelessly – to record and transmit brain signals wirelessly to an app that decodes how the person intends to move.

“[It] has great potential to help people with neurological disorders in future and is an excellent example of how fundamental neuroscience research is being harnessed for medical advances,” said Professor Tara Spires-Jones, president of the British Neuroscience Association.

“However, most of these interfaces require invasive neurosurgery and are still in experimental stages thus it will likely be many years before they are commonly available.”

Telepathy

In another post on X, Mr Musk said Neuralink’s first product would be called Telepathy.

Telepathy, he said, would enable “control of your phone or computer, and through them almost any device, just by thinking”.

“Initial users will be those who have lost the use of their limbs,” he continued.

Referring to the late British scientist who had motor neurone disease, he added: “Imagine if Stephen Hawking could communicate faster than a speed typist or auctioneer. That is the goal.”

While Mr Musk’s involvement raises the profile of Neuralink, some of his rivals have a track record dating back two decades. Utah-based Blackrock Neurotech implanted its first of many brain-computer interfaces in 2004.

Precision Neuroscience, formed by a Neuralink co-founder, also aims to help people with paralysis. And its implant resembles a very thin piece of tape that sits on the surface of the brain and can be implanted via a “cranial micro-slit”, which it says is a much simpler procedure.

Existing devices have also generated results. In two separate recent US scientific studies, implants were used to monitor brain activity when a person tried to speak, which could then be decoded to help them communicate.

s/technology-68137046

Welcome to the Cyborg Era: Brain Implants Transformed Lives This Year


brain-machine interface neuroscience thought to text

This year gave rise to an incredible mix of brain implants that can record, decode, and alter brain activity.

It sounds like déjà vu—brain-machine interfaces also lived rent free in my head in last year’s roundup, but for good reason. Neuroscientists are building increasingly sophisticated and flexible electronic chips that seamlessly integrate machine intelligence with our brains and spinal cords at record-breaking speed. What was previously science fiction—for example, helping paralyzed people regain their ability to walk, swim, and kayak—is now reality.

This year, brain implants further transformed people’s lives. The not-so-secret sauce? AI.

One implant in the spinal cord of a patient with Parkinson’s disease—which slowly destroys a type of brain cell for planning movements—translated his intention to move. After decades, the man could once again stroll down a beachside road with ease. The study paves the way for the restoration of movement in other brain disorders—like Lou Gehrig’s disease, where neural connections to muscles slowly disintegrate, or in people with brain damage from stroke.

Another trial used electrical stimulation to boost short-term memory in people living with traumatic brain injuries. The carefully timed zaps increased attention span decades after the injury—allowing participants to juggle multiple everyday tasks and pursue hobbies like reading.

Brain implants also thrived as diagnostic tools. One study used implants to decode brain wave patterns associated with depression and to potentially predict relapse. The study deciphered how brain signals differ between a healthy and depressed brain, which could inspire better algorithms to nudge brain activity away from depression.

But perhaps the greatest progress was in decoding speech—technologies that translate thoughts into words and sentences. These technologies support people who have lost the ability to speak, giving them an alternative way to communicate with loved ones.

Here are the 2023 highlights from a new generation of “brain-reading” implants.

Thoughts to Text

We speak at a rate of roughly 150 words a minute. It’s a high bar for brain implants.

Many neurological disorders, such as stroke, paralysis, or locked-in syndrome, rob a person of the ability to speak—even if their mind is still coherent. Early this year, a Stanford team helped a 67-year-old woman restore her speech at 62 words a minute, over three times the speed of previous implants. The woman lost her voice due to Lou Gehrig’s disease, which slowly erodes the brain’s ability to control muscles for speech, movement, and eventually breathing.

The study used a massive library of words to decode her speech from two sources: electrical activity in Broca’s area, the brain’s “language center,” and from muscles around her mouth. These signals were fed into a recurrent neural network—a type of deep learning algorithm—to distinguish the basic elements of speech. In just three days, the system was able to decode the woman’s thoughts at record speed—although with errors.

Another system went one better. Rather than using electrodes that penetrate the brain, the device—called ECoG for electrocorticography—consists of small plate-like electrodes placed on the surface of the brain to capture electrical signals. It still needs to be implanted beneath the skull but limits damage to the brain’s sensitive tissues. Each electrode, roughly the size of the head of a thumbtack, can record high-quality neural signals.

ECoG was first used at the turn of this century to record speech and movement signals in people with epilepsy. It soon developed into a device that allowed a person with locked-in syndrome to communicate their thoughts using the implant at home.

What’s new is the introduction of AI. Some algorithms decoded the brain activity of vocal movements—for example, the position of the tongue and shape of the mouth—while large language models, like those powering ChatGPT, constructed sentences from the data. Though the system could translate brain signals to text at roughly 78 words a minute, roughly a quarter had errors. But non-verbal communication made up for the mistakes: the implant used facial expressions to animate a digital avatar, giving patients yet another mode of communication.

A Turning Point

Brain implants are a type of brain-machine interface. True to their name, these devices link the brain to computers. How they bridge the two is wide open to creative solutions.

Most systems measure electrical activity in the brain and often require cables that link electrodes to computers that can decode neural activity.

This year, a study cut the cord with a wireless implant. The system consists of flexible, grain-sized circuit boards sprinkled across the brain that can detect and temporarily store changes in activity. These “nodes” wirelessly transmit data to a headphones-shaped receiver, which processes the information, controls brain stimulation via the nodes, and powers the array. Although wireless, the system still requires surgery for implantation.

An alternative? Devices that capture brain signals without surgery.

One study used AI to translate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data—a non-invasive technique—into the “gist” of a person’s thoughts. The technology doesn’t translate brain activity into words; instead, it captures ideas as they evolve, even though the exact words are lost in translation. Another study measured brain activity with swimming-cap-like headgear embedded with electrodes that sits on the scalp. As a user silently read sentences in his mind, the cap—with the help of AI—translated his “thoughts” into text.

Other devices are exploring entirely new methods of connecting machine to brain—for example, with light. One recent study combined neurons genetically engineered to respond to light and flexible probes that activate these neurons with different colors of LED light. Combined with a common technology that controls light settings, the device, with over a thousand independent LED pixels, could control the activity of multiple individual neurons at once.

Brain cells are noisy. The new device helped sort through the cacophony to resolve the brain circuits underlying specific mental roles. It activated neurons up to five millimeters deep inside a mouse brain—roughly the thickest part of the human cortex.

Paradigm Shift

Brain implants aren’t mind-reading machines. But as the technology evolves, it’s likely to encounter numerous ethical landmines.  A device broadcasting thoughts as text, for example, could inadvertently encroach on privacy.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is already looking ahead. This summer, they released a blueprint on neurotechnology, calling for global regulations and an ethical framework as brain implants hurtle towards an unknown future. The organization previously developed similar guidelines for other key breakthroughs, such as how to use and share human genetic data and how to develop AI to improve society as a whole.

Brain implants have been moving fast, but their real-world utility is just getting started. With transformative power comes responsibility. A global conversation on access, equality, privacy, and more philosophically, what it means to be human shouldn’t be an afterthought. Rather, it may be as important as the tech itself as we continue into an era of cyborgs.

Big step forward! Brain, spine implants help paralysed man walk again


main img

Gert-Jan Oskam has been paralysed from the waist down for almost a decade. Scientists reported implants that enabled a “digital bridge” between his brain and spinal cord, bypassing afflicted parts and allowing him to walk.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

The brain-spine interface, as the researchers dubbed it, used an artificial intelligence thinking decoder to interpret Oskam’s intentions — observable as electrical impulses in his brain — and connect them to muscular movements in the latest study. The aetiology of natural movement was retained, from idea to purpose to action.

Gert-Jan Oskam was living in China in 2011 when he was paralysed from the hips down in a bike accident. Scientists have restored control in his lower body using a variety of devices. 

“For 12 years I’ve been trying to get back my feet. Now I have learned how to walk normal, natural,” Oskam said in a press briefing on Tuesday, reported the New York Times.

Researchers in Switzerland demonstrated implants that allowed a “digital bridge” between Oskam’s brain and spinal cord, bypassing injured regions, in a report published on Wednesday in the journal Nature.

Oskam, 40, was able to stand, walk, and scale a steep slope with the use of a walker thanks to the discovery.  He has preserved these abilities more than a year after the implant was put and has even shown evidence of neurological healing, walking with crutches even after the device was turned off.

“We’ve captured the thoughts of Gert-Jan, and translated these thoughts into a stimulation of the spinal cord to re-establish voluntary movement,” Grégoire Courtine, a spinal cord specialist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, who helped lead the research, said at the press briefing.

“It was quite science fiction in the beginning for me, but it became true today,” said Jocelyne Bloch, a neuroscientist at the University of Lausanne who placed the implant in Oskam.

The brain-spine interface

Oskam had previously undergone stimulation operations and had even regained some capacity to walk, but his progress eventually plateaued. Oskam stated at the press conference that these stimulation technologies had left him with the impression that there was something strange about his mobility, an unnatural gap between his mind and body.

The brain-spine interface, as the researchers dubbed it, used an artificial intelligence thinking decoder to interpret Oskam’s intentions — observable as electrical impulses in his brain — and connect them to muscular movements in the latest study. The aetiology of natural movement was retained, from idea to purpose to action.

ALSO READ | ‘Super fertile’ woman gets pregnant twice in 28 days, delivers both babies on same day

The researchers initially implanted electrodes in Oskam’s skull and spine to obtain this outcome. The scientists then used a machine-learning programme to see which areas of his brain lighted up when he attempted to move various portions of his body. This thinking decoder was able to correlate the activity of specific electrodes with specific goals.

The researchers then used another algorithm to link the brain implant to the spinal implant, which was programmed to transmit electrical signals to various regions of his body, causing movement. The programme could accommodate for minor differences in the direction and speed of each muscle contraction and relaxation. 

Elon Musk’s Neuralink successfully implanted chips in pig brains.


https://bigthink.com/health/neuralink-announcement/?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1652394786

Elon Musk Says AI Will Take Over in 5 Years.


https://elonmuskneuralink.com/elon-musk-says-ai-will-take-over-in-5-years-neuralink/

Elon Musk Says AI Will Take Over in 5 Years.


https://elonmuskneuralink.com/elon-musk-says-ai-will-take-over-in-5-years-neuralink/

How Neuralink Will Change Humanity Forever.


https://techyfiction.com/how-neuralink-will-change-everything/

Elon Musk challenges Vladimir Putin to a fight for Ukraine and he is ‘absolutely serious’


https://www.wionews.com/world/elon-musk-challenges-vladimir-putin-to-a-fight-for-ukraine-and-he-is-absolutely-serious-462250?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=FB-M