Using skin whitening products? Some creams may contain toxic mercury


Some people slather and even inject creams containing mercury onto or under their skin to lighten it, putting themselves and others at risk for serious health problems, scientists say.

Researchers say they can now identify these creams and intervene much faster than before.
“In the US, the limit on mercury in products is 1 part per million,” said Gordon Vrdoljak, of the California department of public health (CDPH).

“In some of these creams, we’ve been finding levels as high as 210,000 parts per million — really substantial amounts of mercury. If people are using the product quite regularly, their hands will exude it, it will get in their food, on their countertops, on the sheets their kids sleep on,” said Vrdoljak.

Identifying the toxic products has been a slow process, however. So, Vrdoljak turned to an instrument that uses a technique called total reflection x-ray fluorescence.

He found that the machine can screen product samples for mercury content far more efficiently, and just as accurately, as its well-established but time-consuming counterpart. That means the team can identify the sources of mercury poisoning and help those affected much faster than before.

“Testing one product using the old technique could take days,” Vrdoljak said.

“Using the new instrument, I can run through 20 or 30 samples in a day quite easily. By identifying those products that contain mercury, we can direct people to remove them and clean up their households,” he said.

Although the metal does lighten skin, dark spots and even acne, research has shown that the silvery liquid can cause a number of health problems, including lower cognitive functioning, kidney damage, headaches, fatigue, hand tremors, depression and other symptoms.

As a result, the US and many other countries have set low limits on or have banned mercury in consumer products.

But demand is high among certain populations for these skin-lightening products, researchers said.

The work has led to two product recalls earlier this year, but often, they find the cosmetics are homemade and come in unmarked containers, researchers said.

The research was presented at the National Meeting and Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS) in San Francisco.

Environmental group seeks ban on toxic mercury used in dental amalgam fillings.


The dangers associated with mercury-based dental fillings are not isolated to just the individuals who receive them, says a new study recently published by the environmental justice group BAN Toxics (BT). Like its name implies, BT is pushing for a ban on mercury use in dentistry due to persistent mercury vapors that threaten not only patients but also dentists, dental assistants, and dental students, all of whom are constantly exposed to mercury-polluted air.

mercury

Entitled “What is in the Air: Mercury Vapor Levels in Dental Institutions,” the new study highlights how mercury exposure levels at many dental practices and schools greatly exceed U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum exposure thresholds. While there is no safe level of exposure to mercury, the levels to which the average dental worker or patient is exposed through the air in practices that use mercury fillings is excessive.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has established an action level for mercury exposure of 1,000 nanograms per cubic meter (ng/m3), while the EPA considers exposure levels equaling or exceeding 10,000 ng/m3 to warrant the issuing of an evacuation alert. But based on air tests conducted in five dental offices and three dental supply stores in the Philippines, levels of mercury vapor typically exceed these two limits.

On the low end, mercury was detected in the air at a level of 967 ng/m3, which is just below the ATSDR threshold. But on the high end, mercury was detected at levels exceeding 35,000 ng/m3, which is more than three times the EPA evacuation alert limit. The names of the clinics and stores were not released as part of the study, but due to their varied locations throughout the country, it is reasonable to conclude that mercury pollution is generally problematic in modern dentistry.

“The exposure to toxic mercury vapors in dental institutions is unnecessary and preventable,” says Attorney Richard Gutierrez, executive director of BT, about the shocking findings. “Learning methodologies can be put into place to avoid toxic mercury. This should itself be a strong incentive as well to abandon dental amalgam use in its entirety in the Philippines.”

Why are dentists still using mercury when safer, more effective alternatives already exist?

A growing number of dentists have begun to voluntarily phase out the use of mercury amalgam fillings, which contain about 50 percent mercury, 22-32 percent silver, 14 percent tin and 8 percent copper and other compounds. But there are still many dentists throughout the world that use them, which some are hoping will change.

“Mercury-free alternatives are now widely-available [and are] safer and as cost effective as amalgam,” said Dr. Lillian Lasaten-Ebuen, president of the International Association of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Philippines (IAOMT-Philippines). “Philippine dentistry should move beyond amalgam and we should prepare the future generation of dentists to embrace better and safer alternatives for their patients.”

BT is also calling for dental curriculum in the country to change, excluding dental amalgams as an option for filling caries. A position that the U.S. and other Western nations would do good to adopt, the Philippines plans to completely phase out the use of dental amalgams in the health sector by 2016, according to Inquirer News, as the brain-damaging chemical has no legitimate or safe use in health and medicine.

“We go to our doctors and dentists in order to be well, and mercury has no place in a healthy society,” adds Dr. Lasaten-Ebuen. “We need to uphold our Hippocratic oath as health practitioners, to help the sick and abstain from harming any person.”

Sources for this article include:

http://www.bantoxics.org

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net

http://www.bolenreport.com