Progress on ‘Universal’ Flu Vaccine


The United States is in the grip of a tough flu season, and the current influenza vaccine is only partially effective. However, scientists say they’re getting closer to a “universal” flu shot for the leading strain of the illness — a vaccine that wouldn’t need to be redeveloped and readministered each year.

Trials in mice found that the new shot triggered lasting immunity against influenza A virus strains, which are responsible for up to 90 percent of cases this year.

“Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent deaths from influenza virus, but the virus changes very fast and you have to receive a new vaccination each year,” explained lead researcher Dr. Bao-Zhong Wang. He’s associate professor at the Institute for Biomedical Sciences at Georgia State University.

“We’re trying to develop a new vaccine approach that eliminates the need for vaccination every year,” Wang said in a university news release. “We’re developing a universal influenza vaccine. You wouldn’t need to change the vaccine type every year because it’s universal and can protect against any influenza virus.”

Currently, flu vaccines have to be changed every year to match the flu viruses predicted to be the most common in the upcoming flu season. However, the vaccines miss the mark in some flu seasons.

The experimental vaccine against influenza A targets flu viruses in a different way. As the researchers explained, the typical seasonal flu vaccine is engineered to focus on the microscopic head of the virus’s exterior surface protein. But this part of the flu virus mutates easily, so it’s a “moving target” each year.

The new vaccine goes deeper — aiming at the interior “stalk” of the virus, which is much less quick to change.

“This way you’re protected against different viruses because all influenza viruses share this stalk domain,” Wang said.

Using super-small protein “nanoparticles” to help target the stalk, Wang’s group found that the vaccine shielded mice against a wide range of influenza A viruses, including strains H1N1, H3N2, H5N1 and H7N9.

Of course, much more work needs to be done, since experiments that work in animal studies often don’t pan out in humans. The next step is to test the vaccine in ferrets, which are more similar to humans in terms of their respiratory system, Wang’s group said.

Two flu experts said such a shot is desperately needed.

“Any vaccine technology that can potentially result in a ‘universal’ vaccine is welcome news,” said Dr. Sunil Sood, chair of pediatrics at Southside Hospital in Bay Shore, N.Y.

“A layered protein nanoparticle influenza A vaccine, if ultimately tested in humans, could protect against the majority of influenza viruses that circulate yearly, because A viruses almost always predominate,” he said.

Dr. Marta Feldmesser is chief of infectious disease care at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. She expressed cautious optimism for the new research.

“While they demonstrate efficacy in mice, whether humans will respond similarly awaits future demonstration,” Feldmesser said.

Source:  Nature Communications.

Swine flu pandemic infected at least one in five Indians.


http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Swine-flu-pandemic-infected-at-least-one-in-five-Indians-Study/articleshow/18201361.cms

H1N1 Swine Flu The 2010 Perspective


Organizers: Doris Bucher (New York Medical College) and Jennifer Henry (The New York Academy of Sciences)Presented by the Emerging Infectious Diseases & Microbiology Discussion Group and the Dr. Paul Janssen Memorial Series

Overview

Influenza viruses such as H1N1 continue to pose a major global public health problem, so understanding their pathogenicity and transmission is crucial. A symposium held on May 24, 2010, at the New York Academy of Sciences revisited the 2009 swine flu (H1N1) outbreak and examined strategies against future outbreaks. Invited speakers covered virulence, transmission, the New York City experience, vaccine development, and the public health implications of a worldwide pandemic. A roundtable discussion featuring all speakers then reflected on the successes and problems during the 2009 outbreak, debated whether this is now considered a rehearsal for more virulent outbreaks, and presented updated strategies to confront future pandemics.

In his examination of H1N1 virulence, Terrence Tumpey from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) discussed the use of a ferret model to investigate the pathogenesis and transmissibility of three 2009 H1N1 viruses compared with a seasonal H1N1 virus. Selected 2009 H1N1 isolates were assessed for their ability to cause disease, and were found to cause increased morbidity and exhibit less efficient respiratory droplet transmission in ferrets compared to the high-transmissible phenotype of a seasonal H1N1 virus. Anice Lowen of the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine reflected on transmission of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus during the 2009 pandemic. Researchers studying the virus suggested that the 2009 pandemic strain spread with comparable or greater efficiency among humans than seasonal influenza viruses. It appeared that the unique constellation of gene segments comprising the 2009 H1N1 viral genome and/or adaptive changes that differentiate those gene segments from their swine precursors facilitated efficient human-to-human spread. Host and environmental factors also played a role in spread of the disease. The emergence of the swine-origin strain during the spring in the northern hemisphere was also important in shaping its epidemiology, as transmission continued throughout summer but peak influenza activity occurred later, during autumn and winter. Work in guinea pig models has found that aerosol transmission is dependent on humidity and temperature, suggesting that novel H1N1 epidemics will continue to adopt winter seasonality.

In a fascinating examination of pathology findings of all fatal 2009 influenza A/H1N1 viral infections seen in New York City, James Gill from the Office of Chief Medical Examiner summarized a review of all medical records, autopsy reports, microbiologic studies, and microscopic slides of the 34 people who died between May 15 and July 9, 2009. The majority of the 34 decedents (62%) were between 25 and 49 years of age, and most cases showed tracheitis, bronchiolitis, and diffuse alveolar damage. Bacterial pneumonia was detected in 55% of decedents, and underlying medical conditions (including cardiorespiratory diseases, immunosuppression, and obesity, as defined by a BMI >30) were associated with most deaths.

To address the role and response of the CDC, as the U.S. government primary front-line responder to all infectious disease outbreaks, Michael Shaw discussed their various pandemic response exercises, conducted in preparation for the appearance of new influenza pandemic strains. These preparedness assumptions were tested during the 2009 outbreak and required real-time reassessment and modification of response strategies. On reflection, systems put in place prior to the pandemic proved to be invaluable. Data and viruses were shared rapidly and openly, new diagnostic assays were deployed in record time, and a new vaccine (which proved to be an excellent match) was developed, tested, and dispensed with the cooperation of numerous government and private agencies and institutes. Lessons learned included the need for further strengthening of global surveillance systems, including animals; the need for improved vaccine technology and delivery to provide vaccines faster and more efficiently (particularly those vaccines not requiring refrigeration, for use in developing countries); and the usefulness of new media (including Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube) for disseminating important and useful messages to the community.

James Matthews from Sanofi Pasteur then provided an industry perspective on H1N1 vaccine development and deployment. Based on an avian virus outbreak in 1997, combined intelligence from the World Health Organization (WHO), various governments, and industry predicted that ‘the next pandemic’ would evolve from an avian H5N1 virus with origins in Southeast Asia. It was anticipated that the pandemic vaccine would likely be adjuvanted and probably require the administration of two doses in order to provide full protection. Surprisingly, the novel H1N1 virus appeared in April 2009 in North America, after it was assumed that subsequent pandemics would be of Southeast Asian and avian origin.

Despite the relatively short time from the 2009 H1N1 virus first being identified as a pandemic threat (April 2009) to the development and distribution of an H1N1 vaccine (September 2009), there is a continuing need to develop our capacity to shorten the duration to the first availability of the vaccine. To discuss new technologies in vaccine development, Jose Galarza of Technovax, Inc. discussed their efforts to develop a new way to produce highly immunogenic non-infectious monovalent and polyvalent influenza virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines. Improved production techniques have brought about many-fold increases in safe vaccine production without the need for inactivation, introducing the potential for higher yields in a reduced timeframe and at lower cost. Philip Dormitzer from Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics then convened a panel discussion with all speakers.


Presented by

  • Paul Janssen AwardThe New York Academy of Sciences

This event is part of the Dr. Paul Janssen Memorial Series at the New York Academy of Sciences.

source: NATURE