swine flu

Swine flu vaccine far more dangerous than swine flu itself.

Posted by

0


A closer look at the overall infection and death rate from confirmed cases of H1N1 influenza during the 2009–2010 “pandemic,” as declared by the World Health Organization (WHO), has revealed that the widely administered vaccine for swine flu is far more deadly than the disease itself. As it turns out, far more people were injured with permanent brain damage, narcolepsy or even death from the vaccine compared to the number of injuries and deaths directly attributed to H1N1.

One out of every 16,000 people who received the Pandemrix vaccine (manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline) for swine flu, according to the International Business Times, developed narcolepsy or cataplexy, a condition that results in a person not being able to sleep for more than 90 minutes at a time, and falling unexpectedly unconscious throughout the day with no warning. The condition is a marker of brain damage, in fact, which is why the UK government agreed to pay out 60 million pounds, or about $92 million, to victims.

Roughly 60 million people received the Pandemrix vaccine for swine flu during the declared pandemic, which means that nearly 4,000 people likely now suffer from narcolepsy or cataplexy as a result. Meanwhile, the actual death rate from confirmed cases of swine flu was minimal, with only 71 confirmed deaths in the UK between April 2009 and February 2010. In the U.S., the reported number was a bit higher, but it has since been revealed that the official numbers were inflated.

As it turns out, most of the supposed cases of swine flu in the U.S. as reported in the media were not actually swine flu at all, nor were they any type of flu! Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson recently confirmed this after consulting with the top federal agency that deals with such matters, which refused to provide her with the actual laboratory results to back its official death numbers.

“I exclusively obtained lab test results from 50 states when the Centers for Disease Control refused to produce them,” reported Attkisson. “The results showed that most of the supposed cases of swine flu were not swine flu at all [emphasis added]. In fact, they weren’t any type of flu.”

Taxpayers, not GSK, ended up footing the bill for brain damage caused by swine flu vaccine

This suggests that most of the alleged 15,000 deaths that occurred in the U.S. from swine flu were actually deaths from other causes, and that H1N1 was not really as big of a deal as health authorities claimed it was. But this fact doesn’t help the thousands of injured or dead children that met an early fate due to GSK’s poisons.

While a total of 60 individuals in the UK are reportedly being compensated by the government for injuries resulting from Pandemrix, there are many more people out there, including many children, who are now seriously ill or dead from the vaccine without recompense. And to add insult to injury, it is the taxpayers that are compensating these injured folks, not GSK.

“Why are taxpayers footing the bill instead of the maker of the vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline?” asked Attkisson. “Under a similar arrangement that vaccine makers have in the U.S., GlaxoSmithKline would only agree to supply the vaccine if it was indemnified against any claim for any resulting injuries.”

Sadly, many of those injured by the Pandemrix vaccine, either compensated or not, are now permanently harmed. Some of them will require lifelong care for their vaccine-induced diseases, which never would have come about if these folks had just avoided the jab. How many more people need to lose their lives and livelihoods before the vaccine racket is taken down and eliminated?

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/051606_swine_flu_Pandemrix_vaccine_GlaxoSmithKline.html#ixzz3p6Pq2Y4o

Lessons From Swine Flu: Avoid Geographic Location When Naming New Infectious Diseases, WHO Says

Posted by

0


The World Health Organization (WHO) is reminding scientists and public health officials to take care when naming new human infectious diseases; the wrong name can have adverse side-effects.

“In recent years, several new human infectious diseases have emerged. The use of names such as ‘swine flu’ and ‘Middle East Respiratory Syndrome’ has had unintended negative impacts by stigmatizing certain communities or economic sectors,” Dr. Keiji Fukuda, WHO’s assistant director general health security, said in a press release. “This may seem like a trivial issue to some, but disease names really do matter to the people who are directly affected.” Fukuda added he’s seen certain names provoke a backlash among particular religious or ethnic communities, which then “create unjustified barriers to travel, commerce and trade, and trigger needless slaughtering of food animals.”

While the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) has final say on what a new infectious disease is called, it’s that much harder to implement when those outside the ICD and scientific community are referring to it as something else. These unofficial names tend to spread online, particularly across social media networks, and ultimately cause confusion. In which case, WHO has collaborated with the ICD, the World Organization for Animal Health, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to come up with best practices.

These practices indicate any name applied to a new disease “should consist of generic descriptive terms, based on the symptoms that the disease causes, such as respiratory disease, neurologic syndrome, watery diarrhea.” In addition to a generic description of symptoms, there should be more specific terms regarding “how the disease manifests, who it affects, its severity or seasonality.” And if the pathogen responsible for the disease is known, it should be factored into the final name. For example, salmonella is caused by a group of bacteria with the same name.

That said, name should not consist of geographic locations, people’s names, any species of animal or food, nor should they consist of any cultural, population, industry, or occupational references. Additionally, names alone should not be fear-inducing. Think of “unknown,” “fatal,” and “epidemic.”

“The new best practices do not replace the existing ICD system, but rather provide an interim solution prior to the assignment of a final ICD disease name,” WHO explained. “As these best practices only apply to disease names for common usage, they also do not affect the work of existing international authoritative bodies responsible for scientific taxonomy and nomenclature of microorganisms.”

Swine flu pandemic infected at least one in five Indians.

Posted by

0


http://m.timesofindia.com/india/Swine-flu-pandemic-infected-at-least-one-in-five-Indians-Study/articleshow/18201361.cms