Jeff Bezos Discusses Plans for a Trillion People to Live in Huge Cylindrical Space Stations


If it were up to Amazon founder and Blue Origin CEO Jeff Bezos, we’ll all be living inside massive cylindrical space stations one day, floating through the distant corners of our solar system while longingly staring back at the Pale Blue Dot we once called home.

During a recent interview with podcaster Lex Fridman, Bezos said that these habitats, like those first described by science-fiction writer Gerard K. O’Neill, could allow an astronomical number of humans to survive.

“I would love to see a trillion humans living in the solar system,” he told Fridman. “If we had a trillion humans, we would have, at any given time, 1,000 Mozarts and 1,000 Einsteins.”

“The only way to get to that vision is with giant space stations,” Bezos added. “The planetary surfaces are just way too small.”

Baby Einsteins

The Blue Origin CEO’s vision is surprisingly different from his number one space competitor and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk’s, who claims to be working towards making humanity “multiplanetary” and establishing cities on other planets like Mars.

But the Amazon founder’s vision of what Earth will become is more sobering. Our planet would end up becoming a holiday destination, allowing us to hop on a shuttle to visit it, the “same way that you might go to Yellowstone National Park,” he told Fridman.

Bezos also argued that future humans would have the choice to either live on an Amazon O’Neill colony or back on Earth — which sounds, let’s face it, a bit reductive and self-serving.

So it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the CEO is also optimistic about the future of AI, telling Fridman that people are “overly concerned” about the dangers of the tech.

As far as his arch-rival is concerned, Bezos stopped short of throwing jabs at Musk, arguing that he “must be a very capable leader.”

“I don’t really know Elon very well,” he added.

And who knows, maybe Amazon’s future space habitats will welcome people with open arms when the climate worsens to the point where living on the Earth’s surface is no longer a viable option — something the CEO’s had plenty of involvement in himself.

Thanks to his company’s robust e-commerce tech, the next protein block will be just one click away. Thanks, Jeff!

Amazon Just Hired a Top Doctor Who Ran a Network of Health Clinics


Amazon has hired a top Seattle doctor in its latest push into health care, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Martin Levine of Iora Health, which focuses on Medicare patients in six U.S. markets, is one of Amazon’s most high-profile hires to date in health. It’s not yet certain what Levine’s role at the company will be, said the sources, who asked not to be named because no announcement has been made.

Levine, a geriatrician who has focused on treating elderly patients with complex medical conditions, could be joining Amazon’s internal health-care group known as 1492, which is testing a variety of secretive projects.

Amazon didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. We tried to contact Levine through LinkedIn and haven’t heard back.

Last year, Amazon recruited health-technology expert Missy Krasner from Box. Krasner works on “special projects” at Amazon, according to her LinkedIn profile.

Amazon has also long been interested in learning about innovative health-care models. The company convened a secret meeting in Seattle a year ago with a group of executives that had rolled out creative approaches to patient care.

A half-dozen people outside of Amazon were in attendance, including representatives from Iora, Kaiser Permanente, and Qliance, a primary care group with funding from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos that shut down in May of 2017, one source said.

Iora has long been a standard-bearer for better primary care, which it achieves by investing in customer service. Its practices accept patients through an employer or a private Medicare plan. Most of these groups are looking to cut down on their health care costs.

Iora has raised more than $124 million in venture capital from a mix of technology and health investors.

Levine spent four years at Iora, according to LinkedIn. In the position of market medical director, he treated patients and also supervised a chain of clinics, designed the health plan and helped managed a team of about 45 staff.

One potential role for Levine at Amazon might be to investigate whether the company should invest in new forms of primary care for its own employees. Whole Foods, which Amazon acquired last year, once explored getting into the health clinic space. CEO John Mackey told Bloomberg that he saw healthy food as key to solving American’s health care problems.

“Many smart employers over the last several years have developed an onsite or near-site clinic,” said Dave Chase, a Seattle-based health investor and an expert in employer health benefits. Chase said a clinic that served Whole Foods and Amazon employees would make “economic sense.”

The New Science of Email Subject Lines.


In the cutthroat world of corporate email, where attention spans are measured in fractions of a second, a well-crafted subject line can make all the difference. Just don’t try too hard.

Dan Moskovitz, a rabbi based in Vancouver, used simple flattery to grab the notice of Amazon Inc. chief Jeff Bezos with the subject line, “Thank You! You’re Awesome.” Though the note was unsolicited and of relatively small concern to Bezos—some praise for a little-heralded Kindle feature—Rabbi Moskowitz received a personal reply, according to a recent account of their correspondence in Marketwatch.

Second-person subject lines often do the trick, especially for busy and high-profile recipients, and they need not be complicated.

“I always find the content line YOU makes people open up fast,” says Tina Brown, the former magazine editor and founder of next month’s Women in the World Summit, for which she wrangled notables like IMF chief Christine Lagarde, former President Jimmy Carter and actress Meryl Streep.

“Nothing is more fascinating to people than themselves,” Brown added in an email sent via a spokesperson. (Subject line: “from Tina.”)

But appeals to ego only get you so far. The next-best advice for subject lines, according to people who regularly snag VIP replies, is to be as plain-spoken as possible. When everyone worth talking to is dealing with a daily torrent of messages, clarity trumps cleverness.

“What you’re trying to do is stop the scroll,” says Anne Lewis, the CEO of digital marketing agency Anne Lewis Strategies, who has worked on campaigns for Hillary Clinton, the National MS Society and others. “Odds are very good that whoever’s looking is looking on a mobile device, just scrolling through, much like a Facebook feed.”

Years ago, a successful subject line was “clever, oblique, evocative,” says Lewis, citing a 2007 email from Clinton’s presidential campaign that simply read, “Let’s do Lunch.” The message, which registered an open rate 25% higher than the campaign average, announced a lottery in which supporters could win a chance to eat with the then-senator at her DC home. It raised $600,000 in the 72 hours after it was sent out, according to a campaign spokesman at the time.

But time is more precious now, and so subject lines must explicitly spell out why the recipient should open the email. In her own inbox, the subjects that best grab Lewis’s attention are the least complicated: “I need you to review this now,” for example, or “I need your feedback.”

Choire Sicha, a co-founder of the website The Awl and a former editor at Gawker and the New York Observer, says he has already begun to treat his inbox like a Twitter stream: catch what you can.

Subject lines styled as coy headlines—”Will the ACA spur most employers to drop health coverage?”—can be easy to ignore, Sicha says.

“‘Do I need to click that? Mmm, maybe later.’ Oh it’s gone, scrolling down the page, oh well,” Sicha wrote in an email, describing his inbox maintenance routine. (Subject line: “re: for WSJ: email subject lines”.)

For his own outgoing emails, Sicha says he often keeps his subjects short and direct: “Reporter request.”

Entrepreneur Rob Biederman took a similar tack in July, when he sent an unsolicited email to Texas billionaire Mark Cuban seeking an investment in HourlyNerd, a business Biederman founded that connects M.B.A.s with small companies for freelance assignments.

Biederman found Cuban’s email address on the investor’s website and tapped out a note on his iPhone. The subject line was unambiguous — “HourlyNerd – Investment Opportunity”. Cuban responded within 15 minutes, Biederman recalls, and the two immediately outlined out a financing agreement similar to the one that was sealed in writing a few months later.

The subject field was “not the catchiest,” Biederman says, “but I just wanted to quickly communicate the name of the company and why I was emailing.”

The typical corporate email user sends and receives about 105 emails per day, according to a 2011 study by California-based researchers at The Radicati Group, a number that is growing by double-digit percentages each year.

“Anything that even hints of spam gets thrown away immediately,” reads an online guide to subject lines by the staff of MailChimp, the maker of an email newsletter tool. Based on research culled from 200 million emails with open rates ranging from 93% to .5%, the company recommends subjects lines that are “pretty straightforward…Heck, some people might even say they’re boring.”

MailChimp found that somewhat banal-sounding subject lines like “Preliminary Floor Plans for Southern Village Neighborhood Circle Members” and “Idlewild Camp – Important Travel Information” were opened by more than 90% of recipients, who likely knew exactly what they were going to get upon reading. On the other hand, more ostentatious subjects such as “Tempting August NUSA Specials!” were opened by less than one percent of recipients. (Names were changed in each example.)

But accuracy doesn’t have to come at the expense of liveliness. Michael Musto, a journalist and gossip columnist formerly of the Village Voice, says he typically doesn’t use a subject line at all. “If they’re going to read it, they’ll read it,” he says.

But when he does fill in the field, he tries to make it exciting. Recent examples: “Job opportunity for you!” and “Great new Miley dish!”

Amazon.com CEO Jeffrey P. Bezos says testing drones for delivery.


Amazon.com Inc is testing delivery packages using drones, CEO Jeffrey P. Bezos said Sunday on the CBS television program “60 Minutes.”

Jeffrey Bezos said the drones, unmanned vehicles that fly through the air, could deliver packages that weigh up to 2.3 kg. That represents roughly 86 per cent of packages that Amazon delivers, he said.

Drone delivery

The drones, which would pick up items from Amazon’s distribution centers and fly them to customer’s homes, probably won’t be put into use for four or five years, Jeffrey Bezos added.

A blog on Washington Post, which is owned by Bezos, said he showed CBS’s Charlie Rose a working prototype of an eight-rotor helicopter drone called an “octocopter.” Emblazoned with “Amazon Prime Air,” the flying robot has a claw at the bottom that allows it to scoop up packages at Amazon fulfillment centers and carry them to customers’ front lawns, the blog said.

The biggest hurdle is the fact that the US, or any other country for that matter, does not have regulations for so much crone occupying the air space. The company will also have to make drones that can carry the said load and stay in the air long enough to deliver the package and come back to base.

“By 2015, the FAA has to come up with a set of rules that integrates just the kind of thing that Amazon is talking about” into the national airspace, Calo said.

Amazon will have to convince federal regulators that the technology is safe and that it wouldn’t lead to excessive congestion. “If what Amazon proposes doesn’t feel safe, the FAA could get worried about the prospect of these things falling out of the sky,” Calo said. In his “60 Minutes” interview, Bezos said that the prototype octocopter has redundant motors so it can stay in the air even if one fails.

Calo said the FAA may be skittish about allowing fully automated drones in the sky. At least initially, the agency might require that a human guide the drones remotely during deliveries. That might initially drive up the cost of the service, limiting its use to customers willing to pay a premium.

Technological issues also could limit the technology’s value in the next few years. According to Calo, the current generation of autonomous flying machines can carry only a few pounds and stay in the air for about 15 minutes. That means that it probably wouldn’t be possible to serve an entire metropolitan area from a single fulfillment center.

But Amazon may be able to overcome both obstacles in the long run. That means that someday, unmanned flights that could allow 30-minute deliveries to become as common and affordable as two-day delivery are today.