Sulfonylureas as Street Drugs: Hidden Hypoglycemia Cause


Taking sulfonylureas sold as “street Valium” can lead to severe hypoglycemia that may result in emergency department (ED) visits, the latest of a handful of case reports suggests.

“Physicians should be aware of this possibility and consider intentional or unintentional sulfonylurea abuse, with or without other drugs,” Amanda McKenna, MD, a first-year endocrinology fellow at the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, and colleagues say in a poster presented at the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) Annual Meeting 2023.

The new case, seen in Florida, involves a 33-year-old man with a history of narcotic dependence and anxiety but not diabetes. At the time of presentation, the patient was unconscious and diaphoretic. The patient’s blood glucose level was 18 mg/dL. He had purchased two unmarked, light blue pills on the street, which he thought were Valiums but turned out to be glyburide.

Sulfonylureas have no potential for abuse, but they physically resemble Valiums and are easier for illicit drug dealers to obtain because they’re not a controlled substance, and they can be sold for considerably more money, McKenna told Medscape Medical News.

“He thought he was getting Valium, but what he really purchased was glyburide…. When he took it, he developed sweating and weakness. He probably thought he was having a bad trip, but it was really low blood sugar,” she said.

Similar Cases Go Back Nearly Two Decades

Similar cases have been reported as far back as 2004 in different parts of the United States. A 2004 article reports five cases in which people in San Francisco were “admitted to the hospital for hypoglycemia as a result of a drug purchased on the streets as a presumed benzodiazepine.”

Two more cases of “glyburide poisoning by ingestion of ‘street Valium,” ‘ also from San Francisco, were reported in 2012. And in another case presented at the 2022 Endocrine Society meeting, sulfonylurea had been cut with cocaine, presumably to increase the volume.

The lead author of the 2012 article, Craig Smollin, MD, medical director of the California Poison Control System, San Francisco Division, and professor of emergency medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told Medscape Medical News that his team has seen “a handful of cases over the years” but that “it is hard to say how common it is because hypoglycemia is common in this patient population for a variety of reasons.”

Persistent Hypoglycemia Led to the Source

In the current case, paramedics treated the patient with D50W, and his blood glucose level increased from 18 mg/dL to 109 mg/dL. He regained consciousness but then developed recurrent hypoglycemia, and his blood glucose level dropped back to 15 mg/dL in the ED. Urine toxicology results were positive for benzodiazepines, cannabis, and cocaine.

Laboratory results showed elevations in levels of insulin (47.4 mIU/mL), C-peptide (5.4 ng/mL), and glucose (44 mg/dL). He was again treated with D50W, and his blood glucose level returned to normal over 20 hours. Once alert and oriented, he reported no personal or family history of diabetes. A 72-hour fast showed no evidence of insulinoma. A sulfonylurea screen was positive for glyburide. He was discharged home in stable condition.

How many more cases have been missed?

McKenna pointed out that a typical urine toxicology screen for drugs wouldn’t detect a sulfonylurea. “The screen for hypoglycemic agents is a blood test, not a urine screen, so it’s completely different in the workup, and you really have to be thinking about that. It typically takes a while to come back,” she said.

She added that if the hypoglycemia resolves and testing isn’t conducted, the cause of the low blood sugar level might be missed. “If the hypoglycemia doesn’t persist, the [ED] physician wouldn’t consult endocrine…. Is this happening more than we think?”

Ocreotide: A “Unique Antidote”

In their article, Smollin and colleagues describe the use of ocreotide, a long-acting somatostatin agonist that reverses the insulin-releasing effect of sulfonylureas on pancreatic beta cells, resulting in diminished insulin secretion. Unlike glucose supplementation, ocreotide doesn’t stimulate additional insulin release. It is of longer duration than glucagon, the authors say.

“The management of sulfonylurea overdose includes administration of glucose but also may include the use of octreotide, a unique antidote for sulfonylurea induced hypoglycemia,” Smollin told Medscape.

However, he also cautioned, “There is a broad differential diagnosis for hypoglycemia, and clinicians must consider many alternative diagnoses.”

Position of Sulfonylureas in the Current ERA: Review of National and International Guidelines


Sulfonylureas (SUs) are one of the commonly prescribed oral anti-hyperglycemic agents (AHA) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), either in combination with metformin therapy or alone. However, concern about cardiovascular safety has limited the use of SUs in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Additionally, lack of uniformity in the national and international guidelines regarding the positioning of SUs in the management of diabetes has also been reported. The objective of this review was to assess the various national and international guidelines on diabetes management and understand the recommendations specific to SUs in various scenarios. A total of 33 national and international guidelines on the management of T2DM published in English were evaluated. These guidelines have considered the latest evidence and suggest the use of certain second-generation SUs as second-line therapy or in combination with other AHAs in select population and specific scenarios. Identification of the appropriate population, classification based on underlying risk, thorough assessment of the comorbid conditions, and a step-wise approach for the selection of appropriate SUs is essential for the effective management of T2DM. Additionally, cost-to–benefit ratio should be considered, particularly in LMICs, and SUs could continue to play an important role in such settings.

Conclusion

Sulfonylureas continue to play a vital role in the management of T2DM. Majority of the international and national guidelines reviewed in this article suggest newer SUs as second-line therapy for treatment of people with T2DM. The newer SUs, such as glimepiride and gliclazide MR, are efficacious, comparatively less expensive and are associated with low rates of hypoglycemia, weight gain, and cardiovascular toxicity compared to the conventional SUs. Hence, despite the continuous advent of newer glucose-lowering therapies, SUs may still be an ideal pharmacological treatment choice in developing countries.

source: Pubmed

Recommendations of IDF, WHO, and EASD regarding the use of sulfonylureas in diabetes.


Sulfonylureas are commonly prescribed oral anti-hyperglycaemic agents for the management of diabetes.

According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) guidelines:

  • Sulfonylureas (except Glibenclamide/Glyburide) are recommended for patients who are not tolerant to Metformin.
  • Sulfonylureas (except Glibenclamide/Glyburide), Sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), or Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors can be prescribed in combination with Metformin.
  • It is advised to educate patients regarding the prevention, recognition, and management of hypoglycaemia while initiating sulfonylureas.

As per the recommendations of the World Health Organisation (WHO):

  • When Metformin monotherapy fails to attain glycaemic control, or for patients with Metformin intolerance, sulfonylureas are recommended.
  • The usage of modern sulfonylureas, such as Gliclazide, is advised to ensure better safety.

According to the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) recommendations:

  • Compared to lifestyle interventions alone, the addition of sulfonylureas effectively mitigates the cardiovascular risk. Therefore, it is recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
  • Relatively lesser adverse events, such as hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular toxicity, are associated with the use of newer sulfonylureas, such as Glimepiride.

What are the differences among Biguanide, SGLT-2I, GLP-1A, DPP-4I, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones?


CharacteristicsBiguanidesSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitorsGlucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonistsDipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP- 4) inhibitorsSulfonylureasThiazolidinediones
IndicationsType 2 diabetes mellitusGestational diabetesManagement of antipsychotic-induced weight gainType 2 diabetes preventionPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)Pre-diabetesType 2 diabetes HypertensionCongestive heart failure[1]Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)ObesityType 2 diabetes ObesityType 2 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Type 2 diabetes Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)1
Contraindicationshypersensitivity to the drug.severe renal dysfunction (eGFR less than 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2).metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis.hypersensitivity to the drug.end-stage renal disease (ESRD).patients on dialysis.hypersensitivity to the drugpregnancygastrointestinal diseases, such as gastroparesis and inflammatory bowel disease.a personal or family history significant for multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A, multiple endocrine neoplasia 2B, or medullary thyroid cancerpatients with a history of pancreatitis.Dose adjustment required for Saxagliptin in patients with eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 with the dose of 2.5 mg once daily.[2]For Sitagliptin, a low dose of 25 mg daily administered in patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 and contraindicated in patients on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. No dose adjustment necessary for Linagliptin.Hypersensitivity to the drug or Sulfonamide derivatives.type 1 diabetes mellitusdiabetic ketoacidosisHypersensitivity to the drug.New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure.serious hepatic impairment.bladder cancer.history of macroscopic haematuria.pregnancy
ExamplesMetforminDapagliflozinCanagliflozinExenatideLixisenatideLiraglutideSitagliptinSaxagliptinVildagliptinLinagliptinGlipizideGliclazideGlimepirideRosiglitazonePioglitazone

Citation

  1. ^ Ganesan K, Rana MBM, Sultan S. Oral Hypoglycemic Medications. [Updated 2021 May 15]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482386/
  2. ^ Collins L, Costello RA. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists. [Updated 2021 Jun 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551568/

Two type 2 diabetes drugs linked to higher risk of heart disease


Two type 2 diabetes drugs linked to higher risk of heart disease

December 21, 2018, Northwestern University
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Two drugs commonly prescribed to treat Type 2 diabetes carry a high risk of cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, heart failure or amputation, according to a new Northwestern Medicine study.

“People should know if the medications they’re taking to treat their could lead to serious cardiovascular harm,” said lead author Dr. Matthew O’Brien, assistant professor of general internal medicine and geriatrics at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a Northwestern Medicine physician.  “This calls for a in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.”

The study will be published Dec. 21 in JAMA Network Open.

The two drugs—sulfonylureas and —are commonly prescribed to patients after they have taken metformin, a widely accepted initial Type 2 diabetes treatment, but need a second-line medication because metformin alone didn’t work or wasn’t tolerated.

This is the first study to compare how each of the six major second-line drugs impact cardiovascular outcomes in Type 2 diabetes patients taking a second diabetes medication.

Basal is engineered to release slowly over the course of the day, compared to the other type of insulin (prandial insulin), which is faster acting and intended to be taken before meals.

More than half of patients nationwide (60 percent) who need a second-line drug are prescribed one of these two drugs, the study found. Yet, patients who take one of these two drugs are more likely—36 percent more for sulfonylureas and twice as likely for basal insulin—to experience cardiovascular harm than those taking a newer class of diabetes drugs known as DPP-4 inhibitors, the authors report.

“According to our findings, we only have to prescribe basal insulin to 37 people over two years to observe one cardiovascular event, such as a , stroke, or amputation,” O’Brien said. “For sulfonylureas, that number was a bit higher—103 people. But when you apply these numbers to 30 million Americans with diabetes, this has staggering implications for how we may be harming many patients.”

Physicians should consider prescribing newer classes of antidiabetic medications, such as GLP-1 agonists (e.g. liraglutide), SGLT-2 inhibitors (e.g. empagliflozin)or DPP-4 inhibitors (e.g. sitagliptin), more routinely after metformin, rather than sulfonylureas or basal insulin, the study authors suggest.

These drugs, however, are more expensive than the sulfonylureas, which is the main reason they are not as commonly prescribed, O’Brien said.

“This should force providers to think about cardiovascular effects of these drugs early in the course of diabetes treatment, and shift prescribing patterns to newer drugs that have more favorable cardiovascular profiles,” O’Brien said.

This was an observational study using data from 132,737 patients with Type 2 diabetes who were starting second-line treatment. The scientists were, therefore, able to use real-world evidence that complements findings from previous randomized trials which studied only one active compared to placebo.