The U.N.’s Terrible Dilemma: Who Gets To Eat?


Women carry sacks of food, airdropped by the World Food Programme, this past summer in Jonglei, South Sudan.

The U.N. is facing a terrible dilemma.

“Basically, when we haven’t got enough money, we have to decide who’s not going to get food,” says Peter Smerdon, a spokesman for the U.N.’s World Food Programme in East Africa.

And even though the program’s budget is at a record high, it’s not enough to keep up with the number of refugees and people in other crisis situations who need emergency food aid. Continuing conflicts in countries like Syria and Yemen and other crises led to the agency’s multibillion-dollar budget shortfall last year. It received a total of $6.8 billion from countries, organizations and private donors when it needed $9.1 billion to do its job.

WFP has already made cutbacks to the number of people it assists in some places. In Somalia, food aid was suspended for 500,000 people in December. In Ukraine, the agency plans to stop giving food to about 40,000 people in February. And in Syria, WFP is providing 2.8 million people with food aid this month, down from 4 million in 2017.

In other places, WFP has reduced the amount of calories that rations contain. “We can do a shallow cut, like 10 percent, 20 percent of the full ration,” says Smerdon. “Or we can do a deep cut if we think the contributions will not be coming in anytime soon.”

In refugee camps, a full daily ration contains 2,100 calories. That is pretty much the bare minimum for adults — to avoid losing weight, women need an estimated 1,600 to 2,400 calories a day while men need 2,000 to 3,000, according to current U.S. dietary guidelines.

The rations vary from country to country, and even within countries, explains WFP spokeswoman Challiss McDonough. In East Africa, the rations would include a cereal grain such as corn or wheat, dried peas or lentils, a fortified flour blend (usually eaten as a hot cereal), some cooking oil and iodized salt.

If funding for a particular region is not “coming in anytime soon,” says Smerdon, “we can do a deep cut.”

In Yemen, the difficulty of providing food rations has been exacerbated by the ongoing civil war and further complicated by blockades that slow down the process of getting food into the country. There have been 40 percent calorie cuts to half of the rations being distributed, says WFP.

The deeper the cuts, the greater the burden on people who are already living in crisis situations, McDonough says.

WFP is usually “the provider of last resort,” McDonough says. When it reduces the number of people it serves or shrinks the size of the daily ration, there is no guarantee that other agencies or organizations will be able to step in to fill the gap. In more stable countries, local branches of organizations such as the Red Cross or Red Crescent societies can help, she explains.

As food aid is reduced or suspended, people might have to sell some of their possessions, using money for school fees or going into debt to buy food.

“When people are trying to figure out how to survive and put dinner on the table every night, it doesn’t allow that family to think about longer-term investments like education, building jobs and businesses and things that will help them in the future,” she says.

The reductions may hit some people harder than others, depending on how much they rely on food aid. In many cases, they get all of their food from WFP, Smerdon says. In Uganda, refugees get a plot of land they can use for growing crops.

And when the cuts are sustained — or deep — there is an increased risk of malnutrition and a suite of other health problems for refugees.

“Their immune systems will be suppressed, and if cuts continue or they’re getting absolutely no food from WFP, inevitably over time, they will fall sick and ultimately many people will perish,” Smerdon says.

Apart from being a source of life-sustaining calories, food rations become key bargaining tools for people living in camps, says Peter Hailey, nutrition expert and founding co-director of the Nairobi-based Centre for Humanitarian Change. He led UNICEF Somalia’s nutrition response during the country’s 2011 famine.

“Parents might decide to reduce the number of meals they [eat] so some of the food can be used not just to feed their kids, but also to pay for health care for those kids or for access to education,” Hailey says.

McDonough and her colleagues are trying to stay positive. “We hope that any cuts like this are temporary,” she says. “That gap between what we want to do, what we think we need to be doing and what we have the resources to do is far too wide for anybody’s comfort.”

Malnutrition Rates Reach Critical Levels as South Sudan Faces Further Food Crisis .


Recent data collected in Mayom County in Unity state classifies one out of every three children as acutely malnourished, with a high prevalence of stunting in children under the age of two years. A Global Acute Malnutrition (GAM) rate of 30 percent was recorded in Mayom in May, double the humanitarian standard of 15 percent. In neighboring Abiemnom County, GAM rates have reached as high as 26 percent, and 23.4 percent in Pariang County in the states’ north. Unity is one of South Sudan’s most conflict affected states, with tens of thousands of people displaced since fighting began in December 2013.

A mother holds her son outside the CARE Nutrition Center in South Sudan.

Across South Sudan, more than 3.8 million people were unable to meet their food needs in April. The figure is expected to rise to 4.6 million by July, according to the latest results of the Integrated Phase Classification (IPC), the tool used to monitor the status of the food crisis in South Sudan.

The rise in malnutrition and food insecurity comes as South Sudan’s economy is showing increasing strain after 17 months of conflict and the decline in global oil prices. Inflation continues to rise with prices for some food staples increasing by as much as 69 percent in some parts of the country.

“We’re seeing malnutrition rates rise in these counties for a number of reasons, all of them to do with the conflict. These communities no longer have the resources to grow their own food, their local markets have ceased to function, and they’re cut off from assistance by fighting or seasonal flooding,” said Mr. Joel Makii, CARE’s Nutrition Advisor in South Sudan. “CARE is stepping up its efforts in all three counties,” continued Mr. Makii. “We’re working together with other agencies to distribute food to these communities throughout the coming rainy season. We’ll also run a supplementary feeding program for children under 3 years, in addition to the regular nutrition programs we run at our clinics.”

In addition to the longstanding resilience of the South Sudanese people, humanitarian interventions from agencies such as CARE have saved thousands of lives. But with international donor support falling far short of requirements, many humanitarian agencies have been forced to do more with less.

“The role of humanitarian agencies in this crisis is more critical now than ever before, yet CARE has been forced to close programs because we no longer have the funding to run them,” said Ms. Aimee Ansari, CARE’s Country Director in South Sudan. “We’re now making cuts to our health and sanitation programs in order to provide food and nutrition assistance in the coming months.”

“We no longer talk much about peace,” continued Ansari. “Instead we try to figure out how we can meet the growing demands for our nutrition and health services. Yet peace is what this country needs most of all.”

About CARE in South Sudan

Since the outbreak of violence, CARE has provided assistance to more than 600,000 people across South Sudan’s three hardest-hit states of Unity, Upper Nile and Jonglei. CARE’s is providing assistance in health, nutrition, peace building and gender based violence. CARE has been operating in Southern Sudan since 1993, initially providing humanitarian relief to internally displaced people in Western Equatoria. The signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2005 allowed CARE to expand into Jonglei and Upper Nile states to support returnees from the refugee camps, and the organization has since broadened its operations to include development programs.

Founded in 1945, CARE is a leading humanitarian organization fighting global poverty. CARE has more than six decades of experience helping people prepare for disasters, providing lifesaving assistance when crisis hits, and helping communities recover after the emergency has passed. CARE places special focus on women and children, who are often disproportionately affected by disasters. To learn more, visit www.care-international.org

Polio is re-emerging in areas previously considered polio free.


Concern is mounting that the global drive to eradicate polio is being undermined by security problems and access constraints that have led to a resurgence of poliovirus in a number of countries previously declared to be free of polio.

On 30 September South Sudan’s new health minister, Riek Gai Kok, declared a “national health emergency” after confirming three cases of wild poliovirus type 1 infection. The country had been officially polio free since June 2009, but the health ministry had been on high alert for its reintroduction since an outbreak was confirmed in Somalia last May, which rapidly spread to Ethiopia and Kenya.

There have now been 174 confirmed cases in Somalia, 14 in Kenya, and three in Ethiopia. Major emergency vaccination campaigns have been started in these and neighbouring countries, but vaccinations have been unable to take place in certain no-go areas in Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

The Sudanese Doctors’ Union warned that the disease could rapidly spread across the border because of a “large immunity gap” caused by the denial of aid access in the Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile areas bordering South Sudan, where the lack of vaccination had left “almost all children susceptible to polio and other vaccine preventable diseases.”1 2

On 1 October the union wrote to the UK prime minister, David Cameron, calling on him to denounce the Sudanese government’s denial of access to healthcare, after doctors were prevented from treating hundreds of people injured in recent demonstrations.

The union’s UK spokesman, Abdelmalik Hashim, told the BMJ that Sudan had just experienced the worst outbreak of yellow fever in recent years after the expulsion of aid groups from Darfur, and now “the refusal of the government of Sudan to cooperate with the international community is jeopardising all the gains achieved by the global polio eradication programme since 1988.”

Source:BMJ