Study: Metformin Linked to Higher Risk of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s


Metformin and Alzheimer's disease

A recent study found that the use of metformin in people with diabetes increased their risk for developing dementia and Parkinson’s Disease.

This may be surprising as not too long ago, we reported on a different study which found the opposite–that using metformin might lower the risk for dementia in older men.

The study from Taiwanese researchers was presented on March 29, 2017 at The 13th International Conference on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases in Vienna Austria by Dr. Yi-Chun Kuan from the Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

The researchers found that long-term use of metformin may raise the risk of neurodegenerative disease in those with type 2 diabetes.

How Harmful Might Metformin Be to the Brain?

As reported by Medscape Medical News, Yi-Chun Kuan and team conducted a cohort study to follow a total 9,300 patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan for up to 12 years. They checked records for these patients from the National Health research database of Taiwan including 4,651 who had metformin prescriptions and 4651 matched controls who didn’t take any metformin.

Dr. Kuan told Medscape they adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes severity and that despite this, “the cumulative incidences of Parkinson’s and dementia were significantly higher for our metformin cohort” at 12 years.

In fact, the risk for Parkinson’s disease or Alzheimer’s dementia went up over 50 percent during a 12 year period in those who took metformin when compared to those who did not. Researchers also found that “outcome risks increased progressively with higher dosage and longer duration of treatment.”

Dr. Yi-Chun Kuan said, “We’d heard about a possible protective effect from metformin. However, we found the reverse,” and she added that large-scale, prospective studies would need to be done in other countries to get clarification of the results.

Another detail the researchers noted was that outcomes increased the longer a patient was on metformin and the higher the metformin dose they took, “especially with use for more than 300 days and doses greater than 240 g.”

A limitation of the study was that the patients on metformin might also be taking other diabetes drugs like insulin or sulfonylureas and Dr. Kuan said that she and her team would like to follow up on these other possible associations.

There was also no word on what the patient’s HbA1c levels were to help indicate the state of diabetes management nor an explanation on how factors were controlled for, as medical consultant, Dr. Larry Ereshefsky told Medscape.

Could a B12 Deficiency Have Anything to Do With It?

Recently, metformin has been shown to possibly cause B12 deficiency, particularly in those who take it longterm. One of the side effects of a B12 deficiency is neuropathy, or nerve damage.

A serious B12 deficiency has been known to also cause side effects like cognitive difficulties such as memory loss.

While this study still needs a follow-up, if you are concerned about metformin or your B12 levels, talk to your health care provider who can provide testing and if needed, guidance on how to get your B12 levels up.

Source:www.diabetesdaily.com

Calmangafodipir reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy


Calmangafodipir, an investigational cytoprotective agent, reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) without affecting chemotherapy efficacy, the phase II PLIANT study has shown.

In 173 mCRC patients on the FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU) regimen, administration of calmangafodipir (5 or 10 µmol/kg) 10 minutes prior to each chemotherapy cycle reduced the frequency, onset and duration of grade ≥2 chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) compared with placebo. [Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Annual Meeting 2015, abstract 27-01-O]

Overall reduction in grade ≥2 CIPN was 43 percent with the 5 µmol/kg dose of calmangafodipir (p=0.146). When patients treated with bevacizumab were excluded, the reduction in grade ≥2 CIPN reached statistical significance for the 5 and 10 µmol/kg doses combined (p=0.025).

Reductions in cold allodynia and paresthesia were also seen with calmangafodipir.

“Importantly, unlike other strategies that have been used to prevent CIPN, calmangafodipir showed no apparent negative impact on the efficacy of chemotherapy,” said principal investigator Dr. Devalingam Mahalingam of the University of Texas Health Science Centre in San Antonio, TX, US. “The objective response rate was 27 in patients who received calmangafodipir 5 µmol/kg and those who received placebo [p=0.49].”

Calmangafodipir was developed as an improvement on the MRI contrast agent, mangafodipir. “While accumulation of manganese in the brain has been a concern with repeated administration of mangafodipir, calmangafodipir was designed to be safe even with repeated dosing,” said Mahalingam.

“Calmangafodipir had a very benign safety profile in the PLIANT study,” he continued. “Neurotoxicity was very low, as was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.”

While more data are needed to define the benefit of calmangafodipir in CIPN prevention, researchers from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group recently characterized the clinical course of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy using data from the phase III study NO8CB. [J Clin Oncol 2015, doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.8533]

They found that in patients with colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX, symptoms of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy were only half as severe in cycle 1 compared with subsequent cycles. The acute symptoms, including sensitivity to touching or swallowing cold items (71 percent), throat discomfort (63 percent) or muscle cramps (42 percent), usually peaked at day 3 of each cycle and improved afterwards. However, they did not always resolve completely between cycles.

Symptoms of chronic neurotoxicity, including tingling, numbness and pain, were more prominent in the hands during chemotherapy. By 18 months, however, the symptoms became more severe in the feet.

“Patients with more severe acute neuropathy during the first cycle of therapy experienced more chronic sensory neurotoxicity,” the authors wrote.

Calmangafodipir reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy


Calmangafodipir, an investigational cytoprotective agent, reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) without affecting chemotherapy efficacy, the phase II PLIANT study has shown.

In 173 mCRC patients on the FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU) regimen, administration of calmangafodipir (5 or 10 µmol/kg) 10 minutes prior to each chemotherapy cycle reduced the frequency, onset and duration of grade ≥2 chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) compared with placebo. [Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Annual Meeting 2015, abstract 27-01-O]

Overall reduction in grade ≥2 CIPN was 43 percent with the 5 µmol/kg dose of calmangafodipir (p=0.146). When patients treated with bevacizumab were excluded, the reduction in grade ≥2 CIPN reached statistical significance for the 5 and 10 µmol/kg doses combined (p=0.025).

Reductions in cold allodynia and paresthesia were also seen with calmangafodipir.

“Importantly, unlike other strategies that have been used to prevent CIPN, calmangafodipir showed no apparent negative impact on the efficacy of chemotherapy,” said principal investigator Dr. Devalingam Mahalingam of the University of Texas Health Science Centre in San Antonio, TX, US. “The objective response rate was 27 in patients who received calmangafodipir 5 µmol/kg and those who received placebo [p=0.49].”

Calmangafodipir was developed as an improvement on the MRI contrast agent, mangafodipir. “While accumulation of manganese in the brain has been a concern with repeated administration of mangafodipir, calmangafodipir was designed to be safe even with repeated dosing,” said Mahalingam.

“Calmangafodipir had a very benign safety profile in the PLIANT study,” he continued. “Neurotoxicity was very low, as was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.”

While more data are needed to define the benefit of calmangafodipir in CIPN prevention, researchers from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group recently characterized the clinical course of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy using data from the phase III study NO8CB. [J Clin Oncol 2015, doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.8533]

They found that in patients with colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX, symptoms of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy were only half as severe in cycle 1 compared with subsequent cycles. The acute symptoms, including sensitivity to touching or swallowing cold items (71 percent), throat discomfort (63 percent) or muscle cramps (42 percent), usually peaked at day 3 of each cycle and improved afterwards. However, they did not always resolve completely between cycles.

Symptoms of chronic neurotoxicity, including tingling, numbness and pain, were more prominent in the hands during chemotherapy. By 18 months, however, the symptoms became more severe in the feet.

“Patients with more severe acute neuropathy during the first cycle of therapy experienced more chronic sensory neurotoxicity,” the authors wrote.

Calmangafodipir reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy


Calmangafodipir, an investigational cytoprotective agent, reduces oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) without affecting chemotherapy efficacy, the phase II PLIANT study has shown.

In 173 mCRC patients on the FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU) regimen, administration of calmangafodipir (5 or 10 µmol/kg) 10 minutes prior to each chemotherapy cycle reduced the frequency, onset and duration of grade ≥2 chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) compared with placebo. [Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Annual Meeting 2015, abstract 27-01-O]

Overall reduction in grade ≥2 CIPN was 43 percent with the 5 µmol/kg dose of calmangafodipir (p=0.146). When patients treated with bevacizumab were excluded, the reduction in grade ≥2 CIPN reached statistical significance for the 5 and 10 µmol/kg doses combined (p=0.025).

Reductions in cold allodynia and paresthesia were also seen with calmangafodipir.

“Importantly, unlike other strategies that have been used to prevent CIPN, calmangafodipir showed no apparent negative impact on the efficacy of chemotherapy,” said principal investigator Dr. Devalingam Mahalingam of the University of Texas Health Science Centre in San Antonio, TX, US. “The objective response rate was 27 in patients who received calmangafodipir 5 µmol/kg and those who received placebo [p=0.49].”

Calmangafodipir was developed as an improvement on the MRI contrast agent, mangafodipir. “While accumulation of manganese in the brain has been a concern with repeated administration of mangafodipir, calmangafodipir was designed to be safe even with repeated dosing,” said Mahalingam.

“Calmangafodipir had a very benign safety profile in the PLIANT study,” he continued. “Neurotoxicity was very low, as was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.”

While more data are needed to define the benefit of calmangafodipir in CIPN prevention, researchers from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group recently characterized the clinical course of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy using data from the phase III study NO8CB. [J Clin Oncol 2015, doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.8533]

They found that in patients with colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX, symptoms of acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy were only half as severe in cycle 1 compared with subsequent cycles. The acute symptoms, including sensitivity to touching or swallowing cold items (71 percent), throat discomfort (63 percent) or muscle cramps (42 percent), usually peaked at day 3 of each cycle and improved afterwards. However, they did not always resolve completely between cycles.

Symptoms of chronic neurotoxicity, including tingling, numbness and pain, were more prominent in the hands during chemotherapy. By 18 months, however, the symptoms became more severe in the feet.

“Patients with more severe acute neuropathy during the first cycle of therapy experienced more chronic sensory neurotoxicity,” the authors wrote.