Why did the world’s biggest ape go extinct?


The 300-kilogram primate couldn’t adapt when a changing environment forced a dietary shift.

An artist impression of the giant ape from southern China shown face on
Gigantopithecus blacki was the largest ape that ever lived, and might have gone extinct because it could not adapt when its environment changed.Credit: Garcia/Joannes-Boyau (Southern Cross University)

The world’s biggest primate might have gone extinct because it couldn’t reach the most nutritious fruits, according to a study published today in Nature1. The paper also offers clues on why the giant ape’s contemporary, an ancient orangutan, continued to thrive almost 300,000 years ago as the environment changed.

With an estimated height of 3 metres and weighing a hefty 200–300 kilograms, Gigantopithecus blacki was the largest primate to ever roam Earth. Anthropologist Ralph von Koenigswald discovered one of the ape’s massive teeth in a Hong Kong apothecary nearly 90 years ago. Since then, researchers have unearthed four jawbones and roughly 2,000 more teeth in caves scattered across China — but no other parts of a skeleton have been found. The scant fossil evidence has made it notoriously difficult to build an accurate picture of G. blacki, let alone the circumstances that led to its disappearance, says study co-author Kira Westaway, a geochronologist at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. “We just don’t know much about it,” she says.

To solve the mystery of its extinction, Westaway and her colleagues analysed fossils and sediments from 22 caves in Chongzuo and Bubing Basin in southern China. They used six dating methods to find the exact timeframe of G. blacki’s demise, and reconstructed the giant ape’s environment in the period before it went extinct using a range of techniques — such as pollen analysis and investigating sediment layers under a microscope. The researchers also analysed chemical traces in the enamel of G. blacki’s teeth to investigate how its diet changed over time, and compared these signatures with those seen in the teeth of its close relative Pongo weidenreichi, an extinct orangutan that lived alongside the giant ape.

Their work revealed that G. blacki disappeared between 295,000 and 215,000 years ago, slightly later than previously estimated (420,000–330,000 years ago)2. During G. blacki’s heyday some 2.3 million years ago, the landscape was blanketed by dense forests with the odd patch of grassland. When the researchers analysed G. blacki’s teeth from this period, they found several distinct bands of various trace elements. The clearer and more distinct these bands are, the more trace elements the teeth contain, which means that the giant ape was eating a wide variety of foods and drinking plenty of water.

A changing landscape

But from around 700,000 years ago, pollen analysis showed that the landscape began to change, with forests becoming more open as the seasons changed more drastically. By this time, G. blacki’s teeth showed more-blurred bands, a sign that it was forced to consume a less nutritious, more fibrous diet as its favourite forest foods and water sources became scarcer. The researchers also found fewer G. blacki fossils during this period, indicating that populations were dwindling.

A model Gigantopithecus jaw containing a fossil fragment is seen from the side next to a much smaller gorilla jaw
A gorilla’s lower jaw bone (left) and a reconstruction from a fragment of a Gigantopithecus blacki jaw bone (right).Credit: Natural History Museum, London/Science Photo Library

On the other hand, the teeth of the tree-climbing P. weidenreichi continued to show relatively clear banding, suggesting that it adapted to the changing environment with greater ease than its ground-dwelling relative.

Westaway suspects that the orangutan might have climbed trees to grab foods that were out of reach for G. blacki. The fossils also showed that G. blacki grew in size during this time, whereas P. weidenreichi became smaller, making it more nimble than the massive ape, she adds.

Between 295,000 and 215,000 years ago, G. blacki was nowhere to be seen in the fossil record whereas P. weidenreichi was still found to be relatively abundant. The thick forests that once supported the giant ape had become sparse during this time , with open grasslands and ferns dominating the ancient landscape.

The study provides the most precise picture of the circumstances around G. blacki’s extinction to date, says Hervé Bocherens, a palaeobiologist at the University of Tübingen in Germany. But he adds that more fossils need to be found to improve body-mass estimates, which would allow researchers to better understand the giant ape’s dietary needs and what made it more vulnerable to change than other herbivores in the forest.

Westaway and her team are on the hunt for more G. blacki fossils, particularly its thigh bones, which would give researchers a better idea of its size and biology. “There’s still a lot more evidence out there,” says Westaway. “It’s just trying to find the right cave.”

The animal that never gets cancer


The animals called rodents make up about 40 per cent of all mammals. They’re very widespread and live in all kinds of extreme environments worldwide.

But one rodent called the naked mole rat is very special – it doesn’t seem to age, it doesn’t feel some kinds of pain, it lives in communities like bees and ants, and it never gets cancer.

First of all, the name ‘naked mole rat’ is dead wrong. It’s not naked (it’s mostly covered with naked skin but it does have about 100 hairs), it’s not a mole and even though it’s a rodent, it’s not a rat. It’s closer to porcupines and guinea pigs than rats.

The naked mole rat lives in the dry, high plateaus of East Africa. It’s about 8 to 10 centimetres long and weighs about 30 grams. They live in groups of about 20 to 300 individuals — though usually about 70 or so.

They dig with their teeth underground tunnels that are kilometres long. In fact, about one-third of all their muscles are in their jaw. For humans the corresponding part is our leg.

As in a bee colony, there are many females but only one has sex and makes babies. She is serviced by between one and three males. And, again as in a bee hive, all the other naked mole rats in the burrow are organised in castes. So some dig tunnels, some are warriors, some look after the babies, some forage for food, and so on.

Naked mole rats are vegetarians — apart from eating their own dead babies and their faeces.

Another odd thing about them is that they don’t feel chemical pain, such as from acid or capsaicin — that’s the stuff that makes chilli hot. This is probably because their underground tunnels are not well ventilated so the carbon dioxide level is not the 400 parts per million we currently enjoy, but 50,000 parts per million or five per cent. We humans can only function for about four hours in levels that high. But naked mole rats do it all their lives.

The problem is that the carbon dioxide dissolves in water to make acid, which both disrupts normal physiological functioning as well as being painful. But the naked mole rat has evolved to not feel any pain and function normally for their whole life.

And speaking of lives, they’re incredibly long-lived. Animals of their size and weight usually live for only a few years. Naked mole rats have lived for over 30 years. And during that long life they don’t show any signs of ageing – no osteoporosis, no muscular frailty, no mental decline and no slowing down of various organ systems. They stay strong and robust until the end.

And speaking of the end. They don’t get cancer. Cancers account for about 10 to 15 per cent of all human deaths, and about 90 per cent of all mice and rat deaths — providing they can avoid cats and the like. Naked mole rats — zero cancer deaths. They simply don’t get any cancers.

We’ve found several different pathways or adaptations they use to avoid cancer. One is called early contact inhibition. The ‘contact’ refers to cells touching or contacting each other. Normally the cells in your body are always dying and always regenerating. And normally they regenerate and grow to a certain stage. Once they have replaced what was there originally they stop growing. Cancer cells do not stop growing in most animals. But they do in the naked mole rat.

If you get a bunch of normal human cells and grow them on a culture plate they’ll grow until they form a single thin mono layer on that plate then stop. But cells from the naked mole rat won’t even get to the single thin mono-layer stage. Once they sense another naked mole rat cell nearby, they’ll stop growing. So inside a naked mole rat, if a cell turns cancerous it will try to keep on growing without limit, but naked mole rat cells have the so-called early contact inhibition. As soon as they get too close in contact with each other, they inhibit growth. The cancerous cell just withers on the vine.

In terms of living longer and more robustly, how to bypass certain types of pain, and how to foil cancers, naked mole rats have so much to teach us.

And that’s a bare fact ….