Choosing Wisely: ACEP Lists 5 Tests to Question


The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) issued a list of 5 tests and procedures that may not be cost-effective in some situations. The ACEP announced this list, which reflects its participation in the ABIM Foundation‘s Choosing Wisely campaign, at the opening session of their annual meeting in Seattle, Washington.

To lower healthcare costs and improve patient care, ACEP recommends that clinicians avoid these interventions when appropriate, after discussing that decision with patients and educating them regarding the rationale.

“ACEP needed a strategy to determine what emergency physicians could do to improve efficiency and reduce cost without affecting the quality of care we deliver,” ACEP Cost Effectiveness Task Force Chair David Ross, MD, an emergency physician in Colorado and medical director for more than 50 emergency medical services agencies in Colorado Springs, said in a news release. “The challenge also was to identify real cost savings, but also to develop consensus among emergency physicians.”

The ACEP board of directors approved the following 5 Choosing Wisely recommendations for patients seen in the emergency department:

1.      For patients with minor head injury who are deemed to be at low risk for skull fractures or hemorrhage, based on validated decision rules, clinicians should avoid head computed tomography scans. The majority of minor head injuries do not result in brain hemorrhage.

2.      For stable patients who can urinate on their own, clinicians should avoid placing indwelling urinary catheters for either urine output monitoring or patient or staff convenience.

3.      For patients likely to benefit from palliative and hospice care services, clinicians should not delay in engaging such services when available. Early referral from the emergency department can improve quality, as well as quantity, of life.

4.      For patients with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue abscesses successfully treated with incision and drainage, clinicians should provide adequate medical follow-up but avoid antibiotics and wound cultures.

5.      For children with mild to moderate, uncomplicated dehydration, clinicians should avoid giving intravenous fluids before a trial of oral rehydration therapy.

“Emergency physicians are dedicated to improving emergency care and to reducing health care costs,” ACEP President Alex Rosenau, DO, said in a news release. “These recommendations are evidence-based and developed with significant input from experts.”

An expert panel of emergency physicians and the ACEP board of directors reviewed pertinent research and input, including a survey of all ACEP members, before developing the recommendations.

In its Choosing Wisely campaign, the ABIM Foundation aims to facilitate discussion among physicians and patients about appropriate use of tests and treatments and avoidance of these interventions when the harms may outweigh the benefits.

More than 80 national, regional, and state medical specialty societies and consumer groups have joined Choosing Wisely since the campaign began in April 2012, but ACEP held off until February 2013. The delay resulted from potential conflicts of the Choosing Wisely strategy with the unique goals of emergency medicine and from concerns that the campaign does not advocate for medical liability reform.

“Overuse of medical tests is a serious problem, and health care reform is incomplete without medical liability reform,” said Dr. Rosenau. “Millions of dollars in defensive medicine are driving up the costs of health care for everyone. We will continue to encourage the ABIM Foundation and its many partners in this campaign to lend their influential voices to the need for medical liability reform.”

Source: American College of Emergency Physicians.

Nitrous oxide for early analgesia in the emergency setting: a randomized, double-blind multicenter prehospital trial..


Although 50% nitrous oxide (N(2) O) and oxygen is a widely used treatment, its efficacy had never been evaluated in the prehospital setting. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of premixed N(2) O and oxygen in patients with out-of-hospital moderate traumatic acute pain.

METHODS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial enrolled patients with acute moderate pain (numeric rating scale [NRS] score between 4 and 6 out of 10) caused by trauma. Patients were assigned to receive either 50/50 N(2) O and oxygen 9 L/min (N(2) O group) or medical air (MA) 9 L/min (MA group), in ambulances from two nurse-staffed fire department centers. After the first 15 minutes, every patient received N(2) O and oxygen. The primary endpoint was pain relief at 15 minutes (T15), defined as a NRS
RESULTS: Sixty patients were included with no differences between groups in age (median = 34 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 23 to 53 years), sex (37 males, 66%), and initial median NRS of 6 (IQR = 5 to 6). At T15, 67% of the patients in the N(2) O group had an NRS score of 3 or lower versus 27% of those in the MA group (delta = 40%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 17% to 63%; p < 0.001). The median pain scores were lower in the N(2) O group at T15, 2 (IQR = 1 to 4) versus 5 (IQR = 3 to 6). There was a difference at 5 minutes that persisted at all subsequent time points. Four patients (one in the N(2) O group) experienced adverse events (nausea) during the protocol.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the efficacy of N(2) O for the treatment of pain from acute trauma in adults in the prehospital setting.

Source: Acad Emerg Med.

 

Outcomes of Medical Emergencies on Commercial Airline Flights.


BACKGROUND

Worldwide, 2.75 billion passengers fly on commercial airlines annually. When in-flight medical emergencies occur, access to care is limited. We describe in-flight medical emergencies and the outcomes of these events.

METHODS

We reviewed records of in-flight medical emergency calls from five domestic and international airlines to a physician-directed medical communications center from January 1, 2008, through October 31, 2010. We characterized the most common medical problems and the type of on-board assistance rendered. We determined the incidence of and factors associated with unscheduled aircraft diversion, transport to a hospital, and hospital admission, and we determined the incidence of death.

RESULTS

There were 11,920 in-flight medical emergencies resulting in calls to the center (1 medical emergency per 604 flights). The most common problems were syncope or presyncope (37.4% of cases), respiratory symptoms (12.1%), and nausea or vomiting (9.5%). Physician passengers provided medical assistance in 48.1% of in-flight medical emergencies, and aircraft diversion occurred in 7.3%. Of 10,914 patients for whom postflight follow-up data were available, 25.8% were transported to a hospital by emergency-medical-service personnel, 8.6% were admitted, and 0.3% died. The most common triggers for admission were possible stroke (odds ratio, 3.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88 to 6.03), respiratory symptoms (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.48 to 3.06), and cardiac symptoms (odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Most in-flight medical emergencies were related to syncope, respiratory symptoms, or gastrointestinal symptoms, and a physician was frequently the responding medical volunteer. Few in-flight medical emergencies resulted in diversion of aircraft or death; one fourth of passengers who had an in-flight medical emergency underwent additional evaluation in a hospital. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.)

 

Source: NEJM

No Return of Pulses in the Field Portends Dismal Survival.


This study’s findings support use of prehospital termination-of-resuscitation protocols.

Prehospital cardiac arrest patients who do not achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) continue to be transported to the hospital despite the existence of prehospital termination-of-resuscitation protocols (JW Emerg Med Oct 17 2008). To determine survival rates in such patients, researchers analyzed data from two urban emergency medical service systems for patients who experienced cardiac arrest presumed to be of medical etiology from 2008 to 2010.

Among 2483 patients in whom resuscitation was attempted, survival to hospital discharge was 6.6%. ROSC in the field occurred in 36% of patients. Survival rates were 17.2% in patients with ROSC in the field versus 0.7% in those without ROSC. None of the 11 patients who survived without ROSC in the field had an initial rhythm of asystole.

Comment: If termination-of-resuscitation protocols that are based on ROSC had been followed in this study, the transport rate would have been halved. Although the authors’ recommendation for no transport of patients without field ROSC or shockable rhythm would save critical resources and reduce risks to prehospital providers and the public from collisions, nonmedical indications such as family wishes sometimes mandate transport of nonviable patients. When such patients are transported, these data are useful for receiving-hospital emergency physicians to determine whether to continue resuscitative efforts on arrival.

Source: Journal Watch Emergency Medicine .

No Return of Pulses in the Field Portends Dismal Survival.


This study’s findings support use of prehospital termination-of-resuscitation protocols.

Prehospital cardiac arrest patients who do not achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) continue to be transported to the hospital despite the existence of prehospital termination-of-resuscitation protocols (JW Emerg Med Oct 17 2008). To determine survival rates in such patients, researchers analyzed data from two urban emergency medical service systems for patients who experienced cardiac arrest presumed to be of medical etiology from 2008 to 2010.

Among 2483 patients in whom resuscitation was attempted, survival to hospital discharge was 6.6%. ROSC in the field occurred in 36% of patients. Survival rates were 17.2% in patients with ROSC in the field versus 0.7% in those without ROSC. None of the 11 patients who survived without ROSC in the field had an initial rhythm of asystole.

Comment: If termination-of-resuscitation protocols that are based on ROSC had been followed in this study, the transport rate would have been halved. Although the authors’ recommendation for no transport of patients without field ROSC or shockable rhythm would save critical resources and reduce risks to prehospital providers and the public from collisions, nonmedical indications such as family wishes sometimes mandate transport of nonviable patients. When such patients are transported, these data are useful for receiving-hospital emergency physicians to determine whether to continue resuscitative efforts on arrival.

Source: Journal Watch Emergency Medicine