Finding gold in gum trees an old prospectors’ trick – ABC Rural (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)


A breakthrough in using gum trees as a way to discover gold deposits has been compared to the practices of old time prospectors.

The CSIRO has found minute traces of gold in the living tissue of eucalypts near Kalgoorlie-Boulder in Western Australia.

The gold has been brought up from as far as 30 to 50 metres below the ground by the massive tap roots of the trees in search of water.

Previously, research into so-called bio-prospecting had been confined to laboratory conditions and after processing of the tree material.

Dr Melvin Lintern, from the Earth Sciences Division at the CSIRO, says finding the gold particles in the leaves and bark of the gum trees is a world first.

“For a long time we’ve been able to collect leaves from the site and then send them off to a laboratory to get them analysed, so that’s not particularly novel.

“Where we’ve done some groundbreaking research is to actually locate the gold in living tissue.

“We weren’t expecting this at all. To actually see the gold particles in the leaves is quite a Eureka moment for us.

“These trees are sort of telling us what’s going on below the ground, and the eucalypts and acacia trees that we did the research on appear to be bring up the gold from a remarkable 30-metre depth.”

Once commercially applied, using tree specimens to identify possible mineral deposits could conceivably slash the costs of multi-million dollar drilling and exploration programs.

The old timer prospectors around Kalgoorlie would say ‘oh there’s blackbutt trees around that area therefore it’s prospective for gold’.

Simon Coxhell, Geologist

Consultant geologist Simon Coxhell agrees this development in bio-prospecting could be an adjunct to normal prospective practices.

“It may be a way of defining initial exploration targets and it is quite valid.”

Mr Coxhell has spent many years exploring in the Kalgoorlie-Boulder region and he says the geology in the area, literally the rocks, is generally of the laterite kind.

That means they’re ancient and highly weathered.

And he believes that’s why the gum trees there are able to show traces of gold and that was recognised by the early pioneers.

“The old timer prospectors around Kalgoorlie would say ‘oh, there’s blackbutt trees around that area, therefore it’s prospective for gold’.

“Those eucalypts they tend to grow in areas of reasonably deep weathering, in areas of lots of mafic volcanic rock, that’s the greenstone belt, which typically gold mineralisation is associated with.”

After more than a century of gold mining, much of Australia‘s easy to access reserves have been mined out and explorers and miners are being forced to go far deeper for new finds.

This breakthrough has the potential to more easily identify prospective areas at depth.

New ideas for how Earth core formed.


Filaments of iron link up in a network that allows metal to flow to the core deep in the Earth
Filaments of iron link up in a network that allows metal to flow to the core deep in the Earth.

Experiments on samples of iron and rock held at immense pressures have led to new ideas of how Earth’s core formed.

Scientists from Stanford University have shown that iron metal will flow through rocks 1,000km beneath our feet.

Using sophisticated X-ray imaging, they watched molten metal moving through rocks, squeezed to huge pressures between the tips of pairs of diamonds.

Their results suggest that Earth’s core did not form in a single step, but grew in a complicated sequence over time.

The depths of Earth are complex and multi-layered.

At the surface, the rocks forming the foundations of our cities, the stones that we build our lives upon, also provide the raw materials for society – metals, fuel, water and nutrients.

These are no more than a thin geological veneer on the planet. In many respects, the deep Earth remains as much of a mystery as Jupiter or Mars.

But new research in the journal Nature Geosciences gives new clues about how Earth may have taken shape and built its core.

A group of scientists, led by Stanford’s Prof Wendy Mao, have shown how metallic iron may be squeezed out of rocky silicates more than 1,000km beneath the surface to form a metallic core.

Ceramic mantle

If you were to follow Jules Verne on a journey to the centre of the Earth, you would find a chemistry dominated by just three elements, until you got almost half the way to the centre – that’s the first 3,000km of your journey.

Oxygen, silicon and magnesium (plus a little bit of iron) make up more than 90% of Earth’s blanketing “ceramic” mantle.

Electrically and thermally insulating, the mantle is like a rock-wool blanket around the core. The minerals of the mantle are the stony part of the planet. But as you delve deeper on this “thought field trip”, things suddenly and drastically change.

With more than half your journey ahead of you, you cross a boundary from the stony mantle into the metallic core. It is initially liquid in its upper stretches, and then solid right the way to the centre of the Earth.

The chemistry changes too, with iron forming almost all of the core, segregated into Earth’s dense inner sphere.

The boundary between the metallic core and rocky mantle is a place of extremes. Physically, Earth’s metallic liquid outer core is as different to the rocky mantle that overlies it as the seas are from the ocean floor here near Earth’s surface.

Liquid iron can percolate through rocks deep beneath our feet.
Liquid iron can percolate through rocks deep beneath our feet.

One might (just about) imagine an inverted world of storms and currents of flowing red-hot metal in the molten outer core, pulsing through channels and inverted “ocean” floors at the base of the mantle.

The flowing of metal in the outer part of the core gives Earth its magnetic field, protects us from bombarding solar storms, and allows life to thrive.

How Earth’s core came about has puzzled Earth Scientists for many years. Experiments on mixtures of silicate minerals and iron, cooked up in the laboratory, show that iron sits in tiny isolated lumps within the rock, remaining trapped and pinned at the junctions between the mineral grains.

Droplets of iron

This observation has led to the view that iron only segregates very early in the life of the planet, when the upper part of the rocky mantle was in fact super-hot and molten.

It is thought that droplets of iron rained down through the red-hot magma ocean to settle at its base, resting on the solid deeper mantle, then sinking as large “diapirs” driven by gravity through the solid mantle to eventually form a core.

The paper by Crystal Shi and Wendy Mao begins to paint a different picture.

“We know that Earth today has a core and a mantle that are differentiated. With improving technology, we can look at different mechanisms of how this came to be in a new light,” said Prof Mao.

Using intense X-rays to probe samples held at extreme pressure and temperature squeezed between the tips of diamond crystals, the researchers find that when pressure increases deep into the mantle, iron liquid begins to wet the surfaces of the silicate mineral grains.

This means that threads of iron can join up and begin to flow in rivulets through the solid mantle – a process called percolation.

It also means that iron can begin to segregate if the rocks are deep enough, even when the mantle is not a molten magma ocean.

Earth core
Lying 5,000km beneath our feet, the core is beyond the reach of direct investigation

“In order for percolation to be efficient, the molten iron needs to be able to form continuous channels through the solid,” Prof Mao explained.

“Scientists had said this theory wasn’t possible, but now we’re saying – under certain conditions that we know exist in the planet – it could happen. So, this brings back another possibility for how the core might have formed.”

Commenting on the results, Geoffrey Bromiley, of the University of Edinburgh, UK, who was not involved in the study, told the BBC: “This new data suggests that we cannot assume that core formation is a simple, single-stage event. Core formation was a complex, multi-stage process that must have had an equally complex influence on the subsequent chemistry of the Earth.

“Their deep percolation model implies that early core formation can only be initiated in large planets. As a result, the chemistry of the Earth may have been ‘reset’ by core formation in a markedly different way from smaller planets and asteroids.

“As such, we might not be able to use geochemical data from meteorites to constrain the bulk composition of the Earth. This is currently an important assumption pervading Earth Science.”

The results were reliant on recent advances in 3D imaging of minuscule samples using powerful synchrotron electron accelerators that generate intense beams of X-rays.

Similar to medical imaging, these sorts of experiments are revealing the nanoscale properties of minerals and melts. But they are also leading to new understanding of how huge objects like planets form and evolve.

Dr Bromiley and his colleagues are now investigating the influence of other factors, like the deformation that asteroids and other bodies might have experienced on their chaotic pathways through the early Solar System, on their formation.

He added: “The challenge now lies in finding a way to model the numerous processes of core formation to understand their timing and subsequent influence on the chemistry of not just the Earth, but also the other rocky bodies of the inner Solar System.

“We are increasingly observing metallic cores in bodies much smaller than the Earth. What process might have aided core formation in bodies that were never large enough to permit percolation of core forming melts at great depths?”

Paleobiology


Childhood field trips to natural history museums were, for many of us, our first brush with the field of paleobiology. Paleobiologists still use many of the tools and methods we associate with the study of ancient animals: exploration, digging, fossil collecting, and microscope work. In recent years, however, the field has become less of a collecting and describing science and moved increasingly into the analytical, data-driven realm.

Spectroscopy, DNA sequencing, X-ray computed tomography scans, and computer models of movement are bringing new insight into ancient organisms, including animal behavior, diet, and evolution (1). Scanning electron microscopes, for example, indicate some feathered dinosaurs were brilliantly colored. Computerized locomotion models indicate how ancient animals may have walked. Isotopic analysis of ancient human hair indicates whether the owner had a more uniform or varied diet.

Beyond incorporating new analytical methods, paleobiology has moved into the applied sciences, gaining a voice in conservation biology. Because the climate has oscillated in the past, for example, preserved records of species distributions, assemblages, individual size, and other measurements can hint at what the future holds and how we can manage ecosystems for preservation and biodiversity (2).

Recent work studying tropical fossils suggests conditions became so hot during the Early Triassic that few plants or animals survived. Those animals left were primarily stunted (3). Paleobiology also lends weight to the importance of habitat preservation, especially along migration corridors. The seasonal migration routes traveled by herds of pronghorn antelope in western Wyoming have been used for 5,000 to 6,000 years. Those routes must be saved if the species is to be (2). Beyond informing policy, some researchers advocate paleobiology training for wildlife managers themselves, helping them answer forensic questions, such as: Are these the remains of a poached animal? (2).

A few biologists, however, question the field’s usefulness for conservation. The ancient record is spotty. Sampling is a product of luck as much as anything. Not all organisms are equally preserved and soft-bodied animals are hardly preserved at all. The links between past environmental and biological changes can be complex, nonlinear, or seemingly absent.

“Even a decade ago, the prevailing wisdom about fossil accumulations was that they were hopelessly biased,” writes Julien Louys, “to the extent that it would be difficult to ever meaningfully compare fossil communities to modern ones. That has luckily proved not to be the case” (4).

Instead, Louys argues, important measurements, such as species composition, trophic structure, abundance, and even genetic diversity, to an extent, can be traced through time, informing and guiding conservationists as they seek to protect modern ecosystems.

References

 

  1. Lyman RL

(2012) Biodiversity, paleozoology, and conservation biology. Paleontology in Ecology and Conservation, ed Louys J (Springer, Berlin), pp 147169.

 

Search Google Scholar

 

  1. Lyman RL

(2006) Paleozoology in the service of conservation biology. Evol Anthropol 15:1119.

CrossRefWeb of Science

 

  1. Sun Y,
  2. et al.

(2012) Lethally hot temperatures during the Early Triassic greenhouse. Science338(6105):366370.

 

Abstract/FREE Full Text

 

  1. Louys J

, ed (2012) Paleontology in Ecology and Conservation (Springer, Berlin).

Source : http://www.pnas.org