![](https://i0.wp.com/pubmiddleware.mims.com/resource/image/2268079C-6C96-49FC-8CD7-A60900BFE1A8/OriginalThumbnail/THUMBNAIL_shutterstock_369722927.jpg)
The pan-ERB inhibitor afatinib improves progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and objective response rate (ORR) compared with gefitinib among Asian patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) included in the LUX-Lung 7 trial. [APLCC 2016, ABS068]
“Median PFS and TTF were significantly longer with afatinib [11 and 13.7 months] than with gefitinib [10.9 and 11·5 months],” said study investigator Professor Kenneth O’Byrne, consultant medical oncologist at the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, at the recent APLCC 2016 held in Chiang Mai, Thailand. “Among Asian patients, PFS was prolonged by 24 percent. OS [overall survival] data are not mature yet.”
The secondary endpoint of ORR by independent review was also higher with afatinib (70 vs 56 percent for gefitinib). ORR in Asian patients was 70 percent with afatinib versus 57 percent for gefitinib.
“Results were consistent across all subgroups evaluated, including Asian patients,” O’ Byrne reported. “The improvement in efficacy was observed in both del19 and L858R populations.” Among Asian patients with del19 mutation, ORR was 72 and 68 percent, in favour of afatinib. In those with L858R mutation, ORR was also higher with afatinib (68 vs 42 percent with gefitinib).
LUX-Lung 7 was an international, phase IIb, randomized, open-label trial investigating the efficacy and safety of afatinib vs gefitinib in untreated patients with advanced, EGFR-positive NSCLC. The trial was done at 64 centres in 13 countries. [Lancet Oncol 2016;pii: S1470-2045(16)30033-X]
Patients were randomized to receive afatinib 40 mg once daily (n=160) or gefitinib 250 mg once daily (n=159) until radiological disease progression or beyond, by investigator decision. Median follow-up was 27.3 months. The coprimary endpoints were PFS by independent review, TTF, and OS. Over half of the participants were Asians (59 percent with afatinib; 55 percent with gefitinib). Baseline characteristics such as ethnicity and type of EGFR mutation were similar between arms.
“Adverse events in both groups were consistent with previous experience using the drugs and were manageable, leading to equally low rates of treatment discontinuation (6 percent for both),” said O’Byrne.
The most common grade ≥3 adverse events reported were diarrhoea, rash and acne with afatinib, and liver enzyme elevations with gefitinib.
“LUX-Lung 7 confirms the benefit of irreversible ErbB blockade with afatinib over reversible EGFR inhibition with gefitinib in the treatment of EGFR-positive NSCLC,” he concluded.