Tai chi more effective than aerobic exercise for blood pressure reduction


Key takeaways:

  • Compared with aerobic exercise, tai chi was better for reducing office systolic blood pressure.
  • Participants with prehypertension also had greater drops in 24-hour ambulatory and nighttime BP with tai chi.

Among adults with prehypertension, 12 months of tai chi significantly decreased office systolic BP by a mean of 2.4 mm Hg more than aerobic exercise, along with greater reductions in 24-hour and nighttime ambulatory systolic BP, data show.

“As a safe, moderate-intensity, multimodal mind-body exercise, tai chi uses a progressive approach that guides individuals to concentrate on slow and fluid movements,” Yanwei Xing, MD, of the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences and Guang’anmen Hospital, Beijing, and colleagues wrote in JAMA Network Open. “Tai chi is suitable for people of all ages and physical conditions to practice. From the perspective of implementation, a tai chi program is easy to introduce and practice in community settings, thereby providing primary care for populations with prehypertension.”

image of people doing tai chi
Compared with aerobic exercise, tai chi was better for reducing office systolic blood pressure.

In a prospective, randomized trial, Xing and colleagues analyzed data from 342 adults with prehypertension, defined as a systolic BP of 120 mm Hg to 139 mm Hg and/or a diastolic BP of 80 mm Hg to 89 mm Hg. The mean age of patients was 49 years; 48.5% were men. Researchers randomly assigned participants to a tai chi group (n = 173) or an aerobic exercise group (n = 169). Participants in both groups performed four 60-minute supervised sessions per week for 12 months.

“In both groups, each session consisted of a 10-minute warm-up, 40 minutes of core exercises, and a 10-minute cool-down activity,” the researchers wrote. “The 24-form Yang-style tai chi, consisting of 24 standard movements, was adopted for the tai chi intervention. Aerobic exercise interventions included climbing stairs, jogging, brisk walking and cycling.”

The primary outcome was office systolic BP at 12 months; secondary outcomes included office and ambulatory systolic BP at 6 and 12 months.

At 12 months, systolic BP decreased by a mean of –7.01 mm Hg for participants in the tai chi group and by a mean of –4.61 mm Hg for participants in the aerobic exercise group, for a difference of –2.4 mm Hg (95% CI, –4.39 to –0.41; P = .02).

The between-group difference was similar at 6 months, also favoring tai chi (–2.31; 95% CI, –3.94 to –0.67; P = .006). The mean reduction in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 12 months was greater for the tai chi group vs. the aerobic exercise group (–2.16; 95% CI, –3.84 to –0.47; P = .01), as was nighttime ambulatory systolic BP (4.08; 95% CI, 6.59 to 1.57; P = .002).

The overall mean attendance rates of the tai chi and aerobic exercise groups during the 12 months of intervention were 87.3% and 85.7%, respectively.

“Our study provides additional important findings,” the researchers wrote. “First, the 24-hour ambulatory and nighttime ambulatory systolic BP of the tai chi group were significantly reduced. Second, a significant decrease in nighttime ambulatory pulse rate was observed in the tai chi group in our study. One potential explanation is that tai chi may play an important role in reducing sympathetic excitability. A previous study showed that tai chi exercise might produce a relaxing effect, enhance vagal modulation and decrease sympathetic modulation. Third, the systolic BP load of the tai chi group was significantly reduced.”

Fatty liver: Intermittent fasting, aerobic exercise may aid weight and fat loss


Combining aerobic exercise such as swimming with fasting may be beneficial for people with liver disease, a study suggests. George Pachantouris/Getty Images

  • Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease involves the buildup of fat in the liver.
  • F​at buildup in the liver is not initially dangerous, but it can put people at risk for other health problems.
  • Data from a recent study suggests that combining aerobic exercise, or cardio, with intermittent fasting may improve nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

T​he liver is a crucial organ in the body that can influence many areas of health. The buildup of fat in the liver, referred to as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),Trusted Source is becoming increasingly more common in certain countries.

Researchers are still working to understand the full impact of NAFLD and the best lifestyle choices to reduce the buildup of fat in the liver.

A​ recent studyTrusted Source examined the effectiveness of intermittent fasting and aerobic exercise in reducing fat buildup in the liver. The researchers found that combining these two methods effectively reduced fat levels in the liver.

The study is published in Cell MetabolismTrusted Source

The impact of NAFLD

NAFLDTrusted Source is when fat builds up in the liver. Under this broad term are two subtypes: nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Nonalcoholic fatty liver is when there is just fat buildup but no damage to the liver. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is when there is fat buildup, liver inflammation, and liver damage.

NAFLDTrusted Source is growing more common, including a high prevalence among adults who are obese or who have diabetes.

Dr. Na Li, gastroenterologist and hepatologist, who was not involved in the study, explained to Medical News Today:

“Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a medical condition when excessive fat accumulates in the liver. It may cause liver inflammation, scarring, and eventually cirrhosis. This condition has become the most common chronic liver disease and a leading cause for liver transplantation in the United States.”

“People with obesity and type 2 diabetes are particularly at high risk to develop nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.”
— Dr. Na Li

Nonalcoholic fatty liver on its own doesn’t necessarily lead to more severe liver problems, but it can increase someone’s risk for cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome.

People with NAFLD can make helpful lifestyle modifications like reaching and maintaining a healthy body weight. However, specialists are still researching the best health option action steps for people with NAFLD.

Combining fasting and exercise for the liver

T​his particular study was a randomized controlled trial. The study authors conducted the trial over three months and included 80 participants in their analysis. They wanted to look at the effectiveness of different lifestyle interventions in improving fat content in the liver. All participants had obesity and NAFLD.

Study author and intermittent fasting researcher Dr. Krista Varady, explained the basis of the team’s research to MNT:

“We noticed that the main lifestyle therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was combining daily calorie restriction with aerobic exercise. We were curious if intermittent fasting combined with aerobic exercise would produce the same reductions in liver fat.”

Intermittent fasting involves only eating during certain time intervals or having specific days with a high amount of calorie restriction. Researchers divided participants into one of four groups to measure improvement in fatty liver.

The first group participated in regular moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. The second group participated in alternate-day fasting, where they only consumed about 600 calories on fast days, and alternated with feast days, where their diet wasn’t restricted.

The third group participated in both an exercise program and intermittent fasting. Finally, the last group was a control group with no interventions.

The combination group demonstrated a variety of improvements, some of which were superior to the other intervention groups.

“We found that liver fat was reduced by 5.5% in the group that participated in both fasting and exercise. This combination group also reduced body weight by 5%, fat mass, waist circumference, and liver enzyme (ALT) levels. We also saw increases in insulin sensitivity in the combination group, indicating better blood sugar control.”
— Dr. Krista Varady

Researchers found that the reduction of liver fat and body weight was similar between the combination group and the group that only participated in intermittent fasting.

Researchers also found that all three intervention groups saw similar improvement in insulin resistance. Thus, the combination intervention could be an option for people with NAFLD but is not necessarily a far-superior method.

D​r. Li said the study “adds to current literature regarding the benefits of weight loss on fatty liver. It is in line with many other studies that calorie restriction is a key component for weight control.”

“Based on this study, alternate day fasting would be adopted as a beneficial strategy by clinicians and patients for weight control and fatty liver treatment,” she told MNT.

Study limitations

The study did have certain limitations that are important to consider.

First, the study included a limited number of participants and ran only for a short time. Over 80% of the participants were female. This and the ethnicity of participants indicate the need for further research that is more diverse.

Second, the combination intervention showed improvements in the liver but not back into a healthy range, which could indicate the need for people with NAFLD to pursue additional interventions. It is also unclear if the interventions would be effective in people with more severe NAFLD.

Because of baseline numerical differences between groups, there was a chance to observe larger average absolute differences in the combination intervention group.

Finally, because of when the study was conducted, the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the exercise interventions and may have led to more variation among participants.

Next steps

D​r. Varady noted that one of the first steps in continued research would be studies conducted over a longer time frame.

“The study was only 3 months long. I think the next step would be to run longer-term trials in this area (6-12 months long). This will help us determine if these improvements can be sustained over longer periods of time,” she said.

Resistance exercise superior to aerobic exercise for sleep


A yearlong resistance exercise program for inactive adults with hypertension improved sleep quality and duration compared with aerobic exercise, combined aerobic and resistance exercises and no exercise, researchers reported.

Angelique Brellenthin

Poor sleep quality is associated with high BP and elevated cholesterol; regular short sleep, defined as less than 7 hours per night, can increase risk for CV events, Angelique Brellenthin, PhD, assistant professor of kinesiology at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa, and colleagues wrote in an abstract. The American Heart Association recommends aerobic physical activity to improve sleep; however, there are limited data on the effects of other popular types of physical activity, such as resistance exercise, on sleep.

Graphical depiction of data presented in article
Data were derived from Brellenthin AG, et al. Abstract 38. Presented at: Epidemiology, Prevention, Lifestyle & Cardiometabolic Scientific Sessions; March 1-4, 2022; Chicago.

“While resistance exercise is not often considered a front-line lifestyle intervention to improve CV health — as opposed to aerobic or ‘cardio’ exercise — resistance exercise may have substantial indirect effects on CV health, nonetheless, by improving the duration and quality of sleep,” Brellenthin told Healio.

Brellenthin and colleagues analyzed data from 406 inactive adults aged 35 to 70 years (53% women) with overweight or obesity and stage 1 hypertension at high risk for CVD. Researchers randomly assigned participants to one of four exercise groups: aerobic exercise only (n = 101), resistance exercise only (n = 102), combined aerobic and resistance exercises (n = 101) and a no-exercise control group (n = 102) for 1 year. All exercise participants performed time-matched supervised exercise three times per week for 60 minutes per session; the combined exercise group performed 30 minutes each of aerobic and resistance exercises at 50% to 80% of their maximum intensity. Participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline and 12 months; only participants with complete baseline data on all PSQI subscales were included (n = 386).

Primary outcomes were the PSQI total sleep quality score, sleep duration in hours, sleep efficiency (defined as time asleep/time in bed), sleep latency (time to fall asleep) and sleep disturbances (a combination of the number and frequency of disturbances).

Within the cohort, 94% of participants completed the intervention with an 83% exercise adherence rate.

For all groups, including controls, PSQI total scores and sleep disturbances decreased significantly. Among participants who reported getting less than 7 hours of sleep at baseline, sleep duration increased by a mean of 40 minutes for participants in the resistance exercise group, by a mean of 23 minutes in the aerobic exercise group, a mean of 17 minutes in the combined exercise group and a mean of 16 minutes in the control group.

Within groups, sleep efficiency increased in the resistance exercise (P = .0005) and combined exercise groups (P = .03), but not in the aerobic exercise (P = .97) or control groups (P = .86; P = .04 for between-within groups interaction).

Sleep latency also decreased by a mean of 3 minutes for participants in the resistance exercise group (P = .003), although the overall between-within groups interaction effect was not significant.

Brellenthin said more research is needed regarding the ideal amount of resistance exercise for clinical improvements and the potential mechanisms linking resistance exercise with improved sleep, particularly those that might differ from traditional aerobic exercise mechanisms.

Does aerobic exercise effect pain sensitisation in individuals with musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review. 


BACKGROUND: Pain sensitisation plays a major role in musculoskeletal pain. However, effective treatments are limited, and although there is growing evidence that exercise may improve pain sensitisation, the amount and type of exercise remains unclear. This systematic review examines the evidence for an effect of aerobic exercise on pain sensitisation in musculoskeletal conditions.

METHODS: Systematic searches of six electronic databases were conducted. Studies were included if they examined the relationship between aerobic physical activity and pain sensitisation in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, but excluding specific patient subgroups such as fibromyalgia. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane methods and a qualitative analysis was conducted.

RESULTS: Eleven studies (seven repeated measures studies and four clinical trials) of 590 participants were included. Eight studies had low to moderate risk of bias. All 11 studies found that aerobic exercise increased pressure pain thresholds or decreased pain ratings in those with musculoskeletal pain [median (minimum, maximum) improvement in pain sensitisation: 10.6% (2.2%, 24.1%)]. In these studies, the aerobic exercise involved walking or cycling, performed at a submaximal intensity but with incremental increases, for a 4-60 min duration. Improvement in pain sensitisation occurred after one session in the observational studies and after 2-12 weeks in the clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that aerobic exercise reduces pain sensitisation in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. Further work is needed to determine whether this translates to improved patient outcomes, including reduced disability and greater quality of life.

Exercise Found to Rival Meds at Lowering Blood Pressure


For people with hypertension, an exercise program may lower blood pressure (BP) almost as effectively as antihypertensive medications, conclude the authors of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

In an analysis of studies that included almost 40,000 patients, evidence-based medical therapy was associated with a greater drop in systolic BP compared to interventions that consisted of exercises for endurance, dynamic resistance, isometric resistance, or both endurance and resistance. But the difference in average BP change was only 3.96 mmHg.

There was no significant difference in the extent to which BP was reduced in an analysis limited to persons with a baseline systolic BP ≥140 mmHg. The study by Huseyin Naci, PhD, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom, and colleagues was published online December 18 in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

“These findings could be used to examine and improve the evidence base supporting exercise recommendations,” particularly in light of the fact that recommendations “are primarily based on observational evidence and highly variable across different settings,” the group writes.

On the other hand, the authors highlight the wide variation in sample sizes and methods used in the exercise RCTs. These variations “highlight the need for a more standardized approach to the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of exercise trials,” the investigators state.

Their meta-analysis included 194 studies of the impact of exercise interventions on systolic BP and 197 antihypertensive drug trials reported from 2012 to 2018.

“We need to be cautious about what types of data we’re looking at here,” especially inasmuch as not one RCT compared exercise and medications directly, Naci told theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology.

“We’re just starting to scratch the surface by providing this piece of information,” he said. “We may want to think about nondrug interventions as potential alternatives to drugs in some cases, and blood-pressure lowering seems to be a good start.”

Naci pointed out that recent guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) lower the threshold for stage 1 hypertension from 140 mmHg to 130 mmHg, which “may result in more people being prescribed antihypertensive medication.”

It’s possible, he said, “that some of those individuals may be indicated instead for exercise interventions. But this is very much something that patients should discuss with their doctors, one on one, thinking about all the constraints, as well as their preferences and values and what they want to achieve with their therapies.”

The researchers stress that “it would be very important to evaluate the comparative systolic BP-lowering effects of exercise and medication interventions.”

Guidelines such as those from the AHA/ACC underline the importance of exercise and other lifestyle interventions in managing and treating hypertension, but they tend to consider pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions separately.

The analysis covered 10,461 individuals in exercise-intervention RCTs and 29,281 patients in trials that evaluated BP-lowering medications. All medication trials included people with hypertension, defined as having a systolic BP ≥140 mmHg. People with hypertension were included in some of the exercise trials, which combined accounted for 3508 individuals.

Both forms of intervention reduced systolic BP levels from baseline in comparison with control interventions. Mean reductions were 8.80 mmHg for antihypertensive drugs and 4.84 mmHg for exercise.

Overall, medications achieved greater average reductions in systolic BP than the exercise interventions. The mean reduction difference was 3.96 mmHg.

The different forms of exercise intervention were associated with similar reductions in systolic BP, although endurance and resistance training combined were more effective in reducing systolic BP than dynamic resistance alone (mean reduction difference, 2.96 mmHg).

All classes of antihypertensive drugs were associated with similar reductions in systolic BP. Interestingly, the group notes, most classes of such medications yielded results that were not significantly different from those seen with isometric resistance and with the combination of endurance and dynamic resistance training.

Also of note, exercise interventions were associated with an average 8.96 mmHg greater reduction from baseline compared with the control intervention solely among persons who had hypertension at the start of the trials.

In that higher-risk group, there was no significant difference in reduction in systolic BP between the exercise interventions and medications (mean difference, 0.18 mmHg).

Further analysis indicated that the benefit of exercise interventions on systolic BP in people with hypertension was driven by endurance training, dynamic resistance, and their combination.

Exercise Preserves CV Function in Breast Cancer Patients


SAN ANTONIO — A year-long structured exercise program initiated 3 weeks after surgery for breast cancer significantly attenuated expected declines in cardiovascular (CV) function as patients continued through treatment, a Norwegian randomized, placebo-controlled study found.

The program, which took place outdoors and incorporated aerobics, weight bearing movement, and stretching, enabled almost full recovery of CV function at 12 months.

The study was presented here during the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) 2018.

“It is striking that for all [patient] groups — whether they received chemotherapy or not — there was a really good effect of being in the physical activity program,” said lead author Inger Thune, MD, PhD, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

“Our study supports incorporation of supervised clinical exercise programs into breast cancer treatment guidelines,” Thune told Medscape Medical News at a meeting press briefing.

“CV function during treatment is a reflection of a patient’s physical function later on in life, because [poor CV function] is a marker of susceptibility to comorbidity and to overall survivorship, so its loss can be a very important issue in daily life,” she added.

Kent Osborne, MD, of the Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, wholeheartedly agreed with the idea of patients exercising throughout treatment as much as possible.

“You’d be surprised how little activity patients get after their diagnosis, and this is partly related to their families telling them, ‘You need to rest because you are on this chemotherapy,’ ” he told reporters.

“But patients need to be as active as they can. They will tolerate chemotherapy better and have better outcomes, so we have to convince the family not to treat the patient as if they are sick,” emphasized Osborne, who moderated the press event.

Study Details

The Energy Balance and Breast Cancer Aspect (EBBA-II) trial enrolled 545 women with stage I or II breast cancer following surgical excision of their tumor.

The mean age of patients was 55 years, and the mean body mass index was approximately 25 kg/m2. More than 70% of both groups had invasive breast cancer.

Approximately 22% of both groups also had lymph node metastases, and about 70% of women in both groups underwent breast-conserving surgery.

Slightly more than half of both groups underwent chemotherapy. About half of these patients received an anthracycline-based regimen, and some 40% received a taxane.

Of both groups, 80% also underwent radiotherapy, and almost 60% were treated with some form of endocrine therapy.

Three weeks after undergoing breast cancer surgery, patients were randomly assigned either to participate in a 12-month exercise program or to receive standard care.

Patients performed aerobic exercises of moderate to high intensity; there was also a weight-bearing and stretching component to the program.

The exercise program was tailored to an individual’s maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), as assessed prior to their undergoing surgery. VO2max is a common measure of CV fitness.

Patients exercised together twice a week for 60 minutes per session and were instructed to exercise at home for another 120 minutes a week to achieve a total of 240 minutes a week of activity.

“CV capacity was assessed before surgery, at 6 months, and again at 12 months,” Thune noted.

“And at a mean of 31 mL/kg/min, the VO2max in both groups was basically identical at baseline,” she said.

Focus on Chemo Recipients

At 6 months, “the intervention group did much better at preserving their CV function than the control group, among whom there was an 8.9% decrease in VO2max,” Thune reported.

By way of comparison, VO2max in the intervention group dropped by only 2.7% at 6 months, the investigators noted.

At 12 months, CV function among those who participated in the exercise program had rebounded to almost the same VO2max levels as prior to surgery. On the other hand, those who received standard care had a 3.8% decrease in VO2max at 12 months relative to presurgical baseline levels (P < .001).

When investigators assessed VO2 levels among 242 patients who had not undergone chemotherapy, findings were again significantly in favor of the intervention group.

After 6 months of exercise, “patients in the intervention group had a 1.6% increase in the level of their VO2max, which was maintained at 12 months of follow-up,” Thune noted.

In contrast, patients in the control group had a 2.7% decrease in VO2max at 6 months. This loss persisted to 12 months, she added.

The researchers also analyzed changes in CV function for patients who had received any kind of chemotherapy as well as those who had been treated with a taxane.

Among 295 patients who received some form of chemotherapy, exercise participants experienced a 9% decrease in VO2max at 6 months, compared with a 14.2% decrease among control patients who received standard care.

Again by 12 months, VO2max had almost rebounded to presurgical baseline levels among those who exercised, whereas for control patients, VO2max was 6.4% lower than at baseline (P < .001).

A separate analysis was conducted for 212 patients who had received a taxane as part of their chemotherapy regimen.

For these patients, treatment effects were most pronounced. There was a 17.5% drop in VO2max at 6 months among control patients and a significant, though slightly less pronounced, drop among exercise participants.

However, at 12 months, VO2max had rebounded to only about 1.4% below presurgical baseline levels among exercise participants. For the control group, there was a 7.3% decrement in VO2max (P < .05).

“It is striking that for all these groups — whether they received chemotherapy or not — there was a really good effect of being in the physical activity program,” Thune noted.

“We believe that breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy should be offered a tailored exercise program based on pretreatment levels of physical function,” she concluded.

Can Exercise Worsen Dementia?


Could exercise worsen dementia? The idea runs against one of the fondest hopes of patients with Alzheimer disease, their caregivers, and physicians. It contradicts some early research and tentative recommendations. But it is a key finding of one of the largest studies yet to examine the question.

In the Dementia And Physical Activity (DAPA) trial, the mean score on the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) worsened more for people with dementia who were assigned to a year of vigorous exercise than for people who kept to their usual routines.[1]

The difference was small but statistically significant, says Bart Sheehan MRCPsych, MD, consultant liaison psychiatrist at the Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust in Coventry, United Kingdom. “It does raise the possibility that, at this point, vigorous exercise might be damaging for people.”

The finding has experts in the field taking a harder look at what they thought they knew about the way physical activity affects a declining brain. It comes as a particular blow because no one has found a way to halt Alzheimer disease. “People are desperate for a treatment,” Sheehan said.

Until the DAPA results came out, exercise was looking like one of the most promising possibilities—if not to stop dementia, then at least to slow its progression. “Among patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) documented better cognitive scores after 6 to 12 months of exercise compared with sedentary controls,” wrote the authors of a 2011 meta-analysis.[2]

Such results were enough to prompt the Mayo Clinic website, a health information website for consumers, to advise that “Exercising several times a week for 30 to 60 minutes may… improve memory, reasoning, judgment and thinking skills (cognitive function) for people with mild Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment.”[3]

But these findings were from relatively small trials. And negative results have also cropped up in the literature for years, including in other reviews of the literature.[1] Funded by the British government, Sheehan and his colleagues set out to settle the question with the most authoritative trial possible.

They recruited 494 people with mild to moderate dementia according to the criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). All lived in the community and were able to sit on a chair and walk 10 feet without assistance. The average age was 77. Sixty-one percent were men.

The researchers randomly assigned 329 to exercise and 165 to make no change in their physical activity. The exercisers attended group sessions in a gym twice a week for 4 months under the guidance of physical therapists. Each session lasted 60-90 minutes. The researchers asked them to work out for an additional hour each week at home during this period. The sessions included cycling in place for 25 minutes of moderate to hard intensity, as well as weight training such as biceps curls, shoulder forward raise, lateral raise, and sit-to-stand using a weighted vest or waist belt.

After the 4 months, the researchers prescribed a home-based program of unsupervised exercise of 150 minutes each week. They encouraged the participants to choose activities at home that they preferred and followed up with phone calls to encourage them. Eighty-eight percent reported continuing the exercises at home. Less than 1% of the participants reported doing structured exercise outside of the trial.

The people who evaluated the patients didn’t know which ones participated in the exercise programs and which ones did not.

After 12 months, the patients improved their fitness compared with the usual-care group. But when it came to cognitive function, the researchers recorded abysmal results. On the ADAS-cog, where a higher score means worsening function, the usual-care group went from 21.4 to 23.8, a worsening of 2.4 points, as might be expected with the progressive diseases that cause dementia.

But the exercisers fared even worse, going from a mean score of 21.2 to 25.2, a worsening of 4.0. For perspective, a normal score for someone who does not have dementia is 5, while the average score of someone diagnosed with probable Alzheimer’s or mild cognitive impairment is 31.2.

The difference was statistically significant (P =.03). It’s not clear whether it has clinical significance, Sheehan says. Still, it startled the researchers.

Despite their improved physical fitness, the exercisers did not improve in activities of daily living, behavior, or health-related quality of life.

“It didn’t come as a surprise that physical exercise was not effective as a treatment for dementia, because dementia is notoriously difficult to treat,” he said. “I think what was a surprise is the very strong signal that it may make dementia worse.” They ran the statistics again and again but found no mistake.

And the finding held up regardless of the patients’ sex or mobility and regardless of whether they were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s versus other kinds of dementia, or whether they had mild versus severe cognitive impairment.

Despite their improved physical fitness, the exercisers did not improve in activities of daily living, behavior, or health-related quality of life.

The finding should influence what clinicians say to people with dementia and their caregivers, said Sheehan, who has treated many such patients. He now tells them that exercise won’t help with such core features of dementia as memory or the ability to organize oneself, and that it might actually do damage.

People who are already exercising and enjoying it shouldn’t necessarily stop, he added. But they must weigh the enjoyment and other health benefits—which are many—against the risk for harm.

Not everyone interprets the results of the DAPA trial as pessimistically as Sheehan. “We don’t have the evidence yet to be able to say that exercise is going to improve cognitive function,” said J. Carson Smith, PhD, an associate professor of public health at the University of Maryland. “But there is more evidence of a benefit in mild cognitive impairment and in people at increased risk for dementia.”

He is among the researchers whose small studies have suggested that exercise can improve cognitive ability in people with mild cognitive impairment. Epidemiologic studies measuring the benefits of long-term exercise for preventing dementia are even more impressive.

This includes a recent sample of 191 Swedish women who were 38-60 years of age in 1968 when they underwent an ergometer cycling test. Examinations of dementia were done six times up to 2010 and supplemented with information from medical records. Women with high physical fitness at middle age were nearly 90% less likely to develop dementia decades later, compared with women who were moderately fit.[4]

Smith and others have found biological differences between more and less fit people that could explain a difference in dementia risk. Lower cardiovascular fitness is associated with a smaller brain volume two decades later, for example.[5]

It’s hard to explain why exercise in healthy people might protect against cognitive decline, but exercise in people with dementia might make it worse. Sheehan theorized that already weakened brains might be too fragile to withstand the temporary loss of oxygen that comes with vigorous exercise. But there isn’t much information yet to support or refute such ideas.

Such studies can’t prove cause and effect. Not only physical activity but also genes affect physical fitness. And people who exercise may have other healthy behaviors.

But even Sheehan has not given up on the idea that physical activity can help people in their declining years. Some kinds of exercise can improve balance, for example. “People say, ‘I wish my father could recognize me,’ but they also say, ‘I wish my father didn’t fall over,'” he points out.

Exercise an Antidote for Aging


If you want to counter the physical costs of getting old, regular exercise might be your best option, researchers report.

The findings “debunk the assumption that aging automatically makes us more frail,” said researcher Janet Lord. She is director of the Institute of Inflammation and Ageing at the University of Birmingham in England.

In the study, the team assessed 84 male and 41 female cyclists, aged 55 to 79. The men had to be able to cycle 62 miles in under 6.5 hours, while the women had to be able to cycle 37 miles in 5.5 hours.

Unlike a “control group” of adults who did not get regular exercise, the cyclists did not have loss of muscle mass or strength, did not have age-related increases in body fat or cholesterol levels, and their immune systems were as robust as much younger people.

Male cyclists also had higher testosterone levels than men in the control group, according to the study authors.

“Our research means we now have strong evidence that encouraging people to commit to regular exercise throughout their lives is a viable solution to the problem that we are living longer but not healthier,” Lord added in a university news release.

The findings were published March 8 in the journal Aging Cell.

Researcher Niharika Arora Duggal, also from the University of Birmingham, said, “We hope these findings prevent the danger that, as a society, we accept that old age and disease are normal bedfellows, and that the third age of man is something to be endured and not enjoyed.”

A daily walk ‘can add seven years to your life’


A daily walk 'can add seven years to your life'
Exercise brings benefits at whatever age the person starts.
Just 25 minutes of brisk walking a day can add up to seven years to your life, according to health experts.

Researchers have found that moderate exercise could halve the risk of dying from a heart attack for someone in their fifties or sixties.

Coronary heart disease is the UK’s single biggest killer, causing one death every seven seconds, and exercise has long been seen as a way to reduce the risks by cutting obesity and diabetes.

A new study presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress suggested that regular exercise can increase life span.

A group of 69 healthy non-smokers, aged between 30 and 60, who did not take regular exercise were tested as part of the study at Saarland University in Germany.

Blood tests taken during six months of regular aerobic exercise, high-intensity interval training and strength training showed that an anti-ageing process had been triggered and helped repair old DNA.

“This suggests that when people exercise regularly, they may be able to retard the process of ageing,” said Sanjay Sharma, professor of inherited cardiac diseases in sports cardiology at St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in London.

“We may never avoid be-coming completely old, but we may delay the time we become old. We may look younger when we’re 70 and may live into our nineties.

“Exercise buys you three to seven additional years of life. It is an antidepressant, it improves cognitive function and there is now evidence that it may retard the onset of dementia.”

The advice from experts is that everyone should do at least 20 minutes of walking or jogging a day, given the sedentary lifestyles and changes in diet that have contributed to high death rates from heart disease. Exercise can also improve brain functioning.

Exercise brings benefits at whatever age the person starts. People who start exercising at the age of 70 are less likely to go on to develop a condition that leads to irregular or racing heart rates in 10 per cent of people aged over 80.

“The study brings a bit more understanding of why physical activity has that effect,” said Christi Deaton, Florence Nightingale Foundation Professor of Clinical Nursing Research at Cambridge Institute of Public Health.

“It helps us understand the process of cellular ageing, as that’s what drives our organ system and body ageing, and the effects physical activity can have on the cellular level.

“The more active you are, and it doesn’t matter when you start, the more benefit you are going to have.”

Heart attacks are mainly triggered by coronary heart disease, which kills around 73,000 people in the UK every year and is the leading cause of death in both sexes. Heart disease generally affects more men than women, although from the age of 50 the chances of developing the condition are similar for both.

According to a separate study, hundreds of young people die every year from “electrical faults” in their otherwise healthy hearts triggered by intense sporting activity.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a rare occurrence that affects one in 50,000 athletes, although most who die are men, researchers found. In the 35 year history of the London Marathon, only one woman has died compared to 13 men.

The study’s authors, from St George’s University Hospital in London, found that a large proportion of cases of SCD in sport occurred in people with anatomically normal hearts, but with inherited faults in the heart’s electrical system that causes them to miss beats and trigger death.

Take A Deep Breath To Good Health: 6 Conditions Yoga Can Treat


yoga
Yoga may not directly cure any diseases, but it can make a difference in treating certain conditions — from back pain to anxiety disorders. 

Yogis, hippies, and holistic medicine specialists have been touting the health benefits of yoga for years: it can improve your fitness level, fight cancer, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, and a variety of other disorders, they’ve argued.

But when it comes to the science backing up these claims, a lot is still left unresolved. For example, research has shown that yoga doesn’t necessarily help at all in treating asthma compared to other breathing exercises. And while yoga and mindfulness can improve quality of life, and reduce chemotherapy side effects, it hasn’t been proved to treat cancer in any way, according to the American Cancer Society.

That being said, let’s take a look at all the conditions or disorders yoga does treat — according to the scientific evidence that’s out there, at least. Maybe this way, you can give yoga a try, and better understand how it may benefit you.

Back Pain

Some 80 percent of adults will experience back pain at some point in their lives, and it’s something that can cause a lot of distress and distraction. But research has shown that yoga or simply stretching can alleviate chronic back pain. A 2011 study found that both yoga and stretching helped people with chronic pain — they were considered “safe options” for a condition that is normally treated with a regimen of painkillers. As long as you focus on yoga’s therapeutic effects (and don’t push yourself too much trying to perfect the crazy poses), yoga may relieve your chronic back pain.

Arthritis

Doctors still aren’t certain whether yoga directly improves arthritis; several studies have yielded different and conflicting results. However, it’s generally agreed that yoga can and does assist in reducing the stress and frustration caused by arthritis — and that incorporating yoga into an arthritis treatment program can only enhance it.

“While there is a great deal of anecdotal evidence of the benefits of yoga (just visit any yoga studio), to date only a handful of scientific studies have been conducted on persons with [arthritis],” Johns Hopkins University states. “These early studies have shown promising results with some improvement in joint health, physical functioning, and mental/emotional well-being… People with arthritis may also enjoy yoga more than traditional forms of exercise, and exercise enjoyment is an important predictor of adherence.”

Heart Disease

A recent study out of Erasmus University Medical Center found that yoga was beneficial for cardiovascular health. While yoga mainly works on flexibility and muscular strength, it’s not considered an aerobic exercise like running — so it’s an interesting finding.

The researchers note they’re not sure exactly how yoga improves cardiovascular health. “Also unclear, are the dose-response relationship and the relative costs and benefits of yoga when compared to exercise or medication,” Myriam Hunink, lead author of the study, said. “However, these results indicate that yoga is potentially very useful and in my view worth pursuing as a risk improvement practice.”

Indeed, yoga is unlike other types of physical activity in that it focuses more on slower poses, meditative breathing, and a calm approach. This trifecta can assist in reducing stress and lowering blood pressure, which can all have a good effect on your heart health.

Anxiety Disorders, Depression

You may enter a yoga class, your body tensed and tight from weeks and even months’ worth of accumulated stress. Our body holds emotion in it — and yoga can help unravel that. Just an hour’s worth of yoga can force you to leave all your stresses and anxiety behind, and this “yoga high” effect can last for hours afterwards.

Though there aren’t too many studies on this yet, one study found that “several studies of exercise and yoga have demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness superior to no-activity controls and comparable with established depression and anxiety treatments” such as cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, and imipramine. “High-energy exercise and frequent aerobic exercise reduce symptoms of depression more than less frequent or low-energy exercise. For anxiety disorders, exercise and yoga have also shown positive effects.”

Chemotherapy Side Effects

While there is no evidence that yoga can fight cancer, or lower a person’s risk, it has been shown to reduce inflammation and alleviate chemotherapy side effects in cancer patients.

In one recent study, scientists gathered breast cancer patients who were suffering from debilitating chemotherapy effects, and placed them in 90-minute yoga classes twice a week. They found the cancer patients had more energy, less fatigue, and slept much better than the patients who didn’t do yoga.

Sleep Disorders

This brings us to yoga and sleep: like most exercise, yoga can improve your sleeping patternsand fight insomnia. Stress and the “buzz” of external anxieties — and yes, a sedentary lifestyle — can keep us lying awake at night. Learning to breathe more slowly and deeply in yoga classes can ultimately improve our sleep. A 2004 study found that yoga treated chronic insomnia in patients