New Drug Combo Helps Hard-to-Treat Hepatitis C.


Combining an old drug with an experimental one may cure many cases of hard-to-trea thepatitis C – without the harsh side effects of the standard regimen, a United States government study finds.

Experts said the study, reported in the Aug. 28Journal of the American Medical Association, is an important research step. It focused on patients who often do not respond well to the current hepatitis C drug regimen because they already had liver damage, harbored a particularly stubborn strain of the virus or had other “unfavorable treatment characteristics.”

In other words, they were the patients who often are left out of clinical trials.

hd46818

“This was the real world, and the treatment response was really quite good,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and one of the researchers on the work.

Of the 60 patients in the trial, 48 percent to 68 percent had the virus cleared from their bodies, depending on the drug dose.

The therapy included one older hepatitis C drug, called ribavirin, and one currently being considered for approval in the United States and Europe, called sofosbuvir. Most important, the regimen excluded interferon – an injection drug that is part of the current standard treatment for hepatitis C.

Interferon is difficult to take and can cause side effects including sleep problems, depression, nausea, diarrhea, muscle pain, fever and fatigue. Researchers are working on various interferon-free drug regimens for hepatitis C.

There are dozens of drugs under development, with several expected to be on the market within the next year or two.

That means the best is yet to come, said Dr. Eugene Schiff, a liver disease expert who was not involved in the new trial.

“This is an important paper,” said Schiff, who directs the Center for Liver Diseases at the University of Miami. “But these results reflect an interim experience. It’s a treatment that will be out there for only a short time.”

Schiff said that in the next year and a half, there should be new oral drug combinations that allow hepatitis C patients to skip not only the interferon, but also ribavirin – which can have substantial side effects of its own, including anemia.

“We’re in the middle of an exciting time,” Schiff said. “I’m very optimistic.”

The current study included 60 hepatitis C patients with factors that make standard interferon-based treatment unlikely to work.

Most had a genetic strain of the virus that does not respond well to interferon. Many also had liver fibrosis – scarring of the organ that can progress to more severe damage, known as cirrhosis, and possibly liver cancer. And most participants were black, a group that traditionally has not fared as well with hepatitis C regimens compared to whites.

All of the patients were given sofosbuvir, an oral drug, plus either low-dose ribavirin or a dose adjusted to their weight. After 24 weeks of treatment, 68 percent of those given the weight-based ribavirin had a “sustained virologic response,” which equates to a cure, Schiff said.

Of the patients in the low-dose group, 48 percent were cured.

Headache, anemia, fatigue and nausea were the most common side effects, affecting anywhere from 16 percent to 33 percent of the patients. But none dropped out of treatment due to side effects, the researchers said.

Fauci agreed that drug regimens that bypass both interferon and ribavirin are the wave of the future. “The ultimate goal is to have a drug combination that would be nontoxic and have a high cure rate,” he said.

The drugs under development also are expected to cut the treatment time from up to 48 weeks to 12 weeks or less, Schiff said.

More than 3 million Americans are living with chronic hepatitis C, but most don’t know it, Fauci said. “That’s why there’s a big push for screening,” he said.

U.S health officials recommend that all baby boomers (people born from 1945 to 1965) get tested for chronic hepatitis C infection. The virus is mainly transmitted through infected blood, and injection-drug use is the top risk factor. But people who had a blood transfusion before 1992 also are at risk, because that predated widespread screening for hepatitis C.

In a small number of cases, the virus is passed during sex.

Schiff agreed that people would need to be screened for the new drug regimens to effectively prevent cases of liver cirrhosis and cancer. Only a small number of people with chronic hepatitis C develop those complications, but there is no way to predict any one person’s course.

Treating all those people with the new drugs coming to market will be expensive, Schiff said. “But it’s highly likely they’ll be cured,” he added. “And you’ll be curing a disease that causes cirrhosis and cancer.”

Source: Drugs.com

Antipsychotic Drugs May Triple Kids’ Diabetes Risk.


Antipsychotic medications such as Seroquel, Abilify andRisperdal can triple a child’s risk of developing type 2 diabetes within the first year of usage, according to a new study.

Powerful antipsychotics traditionally were used to treat schizophrenia. Now the majority of prescriptions for antipsychotic medications are for treatment of bipolar disorder, ADHD and mood disorders such as depression, according to prior research.

But antipsychotic drugs make a child much more likely to develop type 2 diabetes than the medications typically prescribed for these other psychiatric conditions, said corresponding author Wayne Ray, director of the division of pharmacoepidemiology at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, in Nashville, Tenn.

“We found that children who received antipsychotic medications were three times as likely to develop type 2 diabetes,” Ray said. “It’s well known that antipsychotics cause diabetes in adults, but until now the question hadn’t been fully investigated in children.”

Antipsychotics appear to increase diabetes risk by causing dramatic weight gain in children and by promoting insulin resistance, Ray said.

The boom in the use of antipsychotic medication has been particularly dramatic among children. Antipsychotic prescriptions have increased sevenfold for kids in recent years and nearly fivefold for teens and young adults aged 14 to 20, according to a 2012 study from Columbia University.

For the current study, which was published Aug. 21 in the journal JAMA Psychiatry, the researchers reviewed the records of nearly 29,000 kids aged 6 to 24 in the Tennessee Medicaid program who had recently started taking antipsychotic drugs for reasons other than schizophrenia or related psychoses.

They compared those kids to more than 14,000 matched control patients who had started taking other types of psychiatric medications, including mood stabilizers such as lithium; antidepressants; psychostimulants such as Adderall and Ritalin; alternative ADHD medications such as clonidine and guanfacine; and anti-anxiety drugs known as benzodiazepines.

Within the first year, users of antipsychotic drugs had triple the risk for type 2 diabetes compared to users of other psychiatric medications.

The risk continued to rise with cumulative antipsychotic dose, and remained high for as long as a year after kids were taken off their antipsychotics. When the researchers looked only at kids 17 and younger, the findings held.

“Diabetes can develop relatively soon after beginning these drugs,” Ray said. “We found that the risk was increased within the first year of use, and this is consistent with case reports. The risk may need to be considered even for relatively short periods of use.”

The specific antipsychotic medication used with children didn’t seem to have any effect on reducing risk of diabetes.

“In our study, we didn’t see a difference between different types of drugs,” Ray said. “It may be an effect of the whole class of antipsychotics.” The majority of participants were taking “atypical” antipsychotics, also called second-generation antipsychotics.

Another expert agreed that the study results are cause for concern.

The findings should lead doctors and parents to question the “off-label” use of antipsychotic drugs for conditions other than schizophrenia and psychosis, said Dr. Ken Duckworth, medical director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness.

“There aren’t many antipsychotic medications that are FDA-approved for use in children,” Duckworth said. “When you’re using a compound that doesn’t have an indication, you have to be very careful about the risk/benefit assessment of that medication. You want to make sure you’ve reviewed all the alternative medicines and alternative strategies.”

Ray agreed, arguing that doctors should consider all other alternative treatments before resorting to antipsychotics.

If children must be placed on antipsychotics, then doctors and parents need to keep a close eye on them for early warning signs of diabetes. “Frequent monitoring of the factors that lead to diabetes would be important, including weight and glucose intolerance,” Ray said.

In the past 20 years, growing numbers of U.S. children and teens – especially overweight kids – have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, formerly known as adult onset diabetes. This puts them at risk of developing other serious health conditions such as heart disease and kidney disease.

Although the study found an association between the use of antipsychotics and a greatly increased risk of childhood type 2 diabetes, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.

Source: Drugs.com

Experimental Drug Shows Promise for Rare Genetic Disorder.


 

A new medication appears to be highly effective in combating a heredity-based form of the organ-damaging genetic disorder known as amyloidosis, according to researchers.

Amyloidosis refers to a family of more than a dozen diseases in which different types of abnormal proteins called amyloids lodge in major organs and nerves. These amyloids build up to the point that they cause damage and, ultimately, organ failure. The new therapy caused a marked decline in blood-borne levels of an amyloid protein called transthyretin, or TTR, in 32 patients suffering from amyloidosis during one of the two Phase I drug trials, said the study’s co-author, Dr. Akshay Vaishnaw, chief medical officer for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, which developed the medication and funded the trials. “We can dramatically reduce the levels of TTR protein,” Vaishnaw said. “In fact, we can reduce them by 94 percent. One shot a month will produce this reduction.” The study findings are published in the Aug. 29 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Amyloidosis is a very rare disease. Between 1,500 and 2,500 Americans a year are diagnosed with AL amyloidosis, the disorder’s most common form, according to Harvard Medical School. Heredity-based forms of amyloidosis, most of which are related to transthyretin, are even rarer. People suffering from TTR amyloidosis eventually become wheelchair-bound as the buildup of abnormal proteins along the nerves causes painful neuropathy in their arms and legs, Vaishnaw said. Transthyretin amyloids also lodge in the heart, causing heart disease that can lead to irregular heartbeat and heart failure. Nearly all transthyretin amyloids are produced by the liver and, up to now, liver transplant has been the only effective treatment for TTR amyloidosis, Vaishnaw said. The new medication – tested in the trials in two versions, called ALN-TTR01 and ALN-TTR02 – is delivered via an intravenous infusion and works by inhibiting the genetic process that prompts the creation of transthyretin.

Blocking transthyretin production in the liver causes blood levels of the amyloid to drop. The drug produced no major side effects in the patients tested, Vaishnaw said, noting that one patient did suffer an infusion reaction unrelated to the drug. “This is a very exciting report, but it’s also a very early report,” said Dr. Raymond Comenzo, director of the Blood Bank and Stem Cell Processing Laboratory at Tufts Medical Center in Boston. “There was clear-cut evidence of safety and of effectiveness in reducing circulating levels of transthyretin.” However, more research will need to be done to show that the drug not only reduces TTR amyloid levels but also helps improve amyloidosis symptoms in patients, Comenzo added. “One has to wonder what the road ahead is, how will the clinical development process work its way out,” Comenzo said.

“The [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] is going to want to see a benefit that’s measured in terms more than just levels of circulating TTR.” For example, he added, regulators will want to see a reduction in organ damage or an overall improvement in survival rates. Vaishnaw said he expects to be able to show those kinds of results, given that previous studies have shown that amyloid deposits will begin flushing from a person’s organs if the levels of amyloid in the bloodstream decrease dramatically. “It’s allowing the organs to clear the deposits that are already there,” Vaishnaw said. “We’re hoping that over time we’ll allow clearing of the existing deposits, which has been seen in other amyloidosis disorders.” However, it will likely be years before the medication passes through drug trials and receives FDA approval, he added. Source: Drugs.com