Metastatic disease is the most common neoplasm involving the skeletal system and can result in significant pain and morbidity. Although narcotic medications and external beam radiation therapy remain the standard of care, several image-guided ablation techniques have evolved to play a role in the management of painful bone metastases. This article reviews the percutaneous ablation techniques available for relieving bone pain in patients suffering from cancer.
source: science direct
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scanning are emerging as valuable tools to quantitatively map the spatial distribution of vascular parameters, such as perfusion, vascular permeability, blood volume, and mean transit time in tumors and normal organs. DCE MRI/CT have shown prognostic and predictive value for response of certain cancers to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. DCE MRI/CT offer the promise of early assessment of tumor response to radiation therapy, opening a window for adaptively optimizing radiation therapy based upon functional alterations that occur earlier than morphologic changes. DCE MRI/CT has also shown the potential of mapping dose responses in normal organs and tissue for evaluation of individual sensitivity to radiation, providing additional opportunities to minimize risks of radiation injury. The evidence for potentially applying DCE MRI and CT for selection and delineation of radiation boost targets is growing. The clinical use of DCE MRI and CT scanning as a biomarker or even a surrogate endpoint for radiation therapy assessment of tumor and normal organs must consider technical validation issues, including standardization, reproducibility, accuracy and robustness, and clinical validation of the sensitivity and specificity for each specific problem of interest. Although holding great promise, to date, DCE MRI and CT scanning have not been qualified as a surrogate endpoint for radiation therapy assessment or for treatment modification in any prospective phase III clinical trial for any tumor site.
source: science direct
Dose painting is the prescription of a nonuniform radiation dose distribution to the target volume based on functional or molecular images shown to indicate the local risk of relapse. Two prototypical strategies for implementing this novel paradigm in radiation oncology are reviewed: subvolume boosting and dose painting by numbers. Subvolume boosting involves the selection of a “target within the target,” defined by image segmentation on the basis of the quantitative information in the image or morphologically, and this is related to image-based target volume selection and delineation. Dose painting by numbers is a voxel-level prescription of dose based on a mathematical transformation of the image intensity of individual pixels. The quantitative use of images to decide both where and how to delivery radiation therapy in an individual case is also called theragnostic imaging. Dose painting targets are imaging surrogates for cellular or microenvironmental phenotypes associated with poor radioresponsiveness. In this review, the focus is on the following positron emission tomography tracers: FDG and choline as surrogates for tumor burden, fluorothymidine as a surrogate for proliferation (or cellular growth fraction) and hypoxia-sensitive tracers, including [18F] fluoromisonidazole, EF3, EF5, and 64Cu-labeled copper(II) diacetyl-di(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) as surrogates of cellular hypoxia. Research advances supporting the clinicobiological rationale for dose painting are reviewed as are studies of the technical feasibility of optimizing and delivering realistic dose painted radiation therapy plans. Challenges and research priorities in this exciting research field are defined and a possible design for a randomized clinical trial of dose painting is presented.
source: science direct
External beam radiation therapy procedures have, until recently, been planned almost exclusively using anatomic imaging methods. Molecular imaging using hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography scanning or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging has provided new insights into the precise location of tumors (staging) and the extent and character of the biologically active tumor volume (BTV) and has provided differential response information during and after therapy. In addition to the commonly used radiotracer 18F-fluoro- 2-deoxyD-glucose (FDG), additional radiopharmaceuticals are being explored to image major physiological processes as well as tumor biological properties, such as hypoxia, proliferation, amino acid accumulation, apoptosis, and receptor expression, providing the potential to target or boost the radiation dose to a biologically relevant region within a tumor, such as the most hypoxic or most proliferative area. Imaging using SPECT agents has furthered the possibility of limiting dose to functional normal tissues. PET can also portray the distribution of particle therapy by displaying activated species in situ. With both PET and SPECT imaging, fundamental physical issues of limited spatial resolution relative to the biological process, partial volume effects for quantification of small volumes, image misregistration, motion, and edge delineation must be carefully considered and can differ by agent or the method applied. Molecular imaging–guided radiation therapy (MIGRT) is a rapidly evolving and promising area of investigation and clinical translation. As MIGRT evolves, evidence must continue to be gathered to support improved clinical outcomes using MIGRT versus purely anatomic approaches.
source: science direct
The rapid development of techniques that enable synthesis (and manipulation) of matter on the nanometer scale and the development of new nanomaterials will play a large role in disease diagnosis and treatment, specifically in targeted cancer therapy. Targeted nanocarriers are an intriguing means to selectively deliver high concentrations of cytotoxic agents or imaging labels directly to the cancer site. Often, solubility issues and an unfavorable biodistribution can result in a suboptimal response of novel agents even though they are very potent. New nanoparticulate formulations allow simultaneous imaging and therapy (“theranostics”), which can provide a realistic means for the clinical implementation of such otherwise suboptimal formulations. In this review, we did not attempt to provide a complete overview of the rapidly enlarging field of nanotechnology in cancer; rather, we presented properties specific to nanoparticles and examples of their uses, which show their importance for targeted cancer therapy.
source: science direct
Survivors of childhood cancer represent a rapidly growing population of patients, some of whom experience temporary or permanent premature ovarian failure (POF) as a consequence of their disease or treatment. Although the risks and benefits of exogenous hormones have been extensively explored in menopausal women 50 years of age and older, there is scant data on the long-term safety of exogenous hormones in childhood cancer survivors. Although there are certainly benefits that can be achieved through hormone replacement for this unique population, many of these patients also have very long hormone exposure times and a markedly increased baseline risk for second malignancies, including breast cancer. Given the significant potential risks, hormone replacement should not be reflexively instituted in childhood cancer survivors with POF. It should only be considered following a thorough, balanced discussion of the risks and benefits of hormone replacement with each patient.
source: science direct
ARYAN'S BLOG 