Suicide-Related Events in Patients Treated with Antiepileptic Drugs


Background

A previous meta-analysis of data from clinical trials showed an association between antiepileptic drugs and suicidality (suicidal ideation, behavior, or both). We used observational data to examine the association between the use or nonuse of antiepileptic drugs and suicide-related events (attempted suicides and completed suicides) in patients with epilepsy, depression, or bipolar disorder.

Methods

We used data collected as part of the clinical care of patients who were representative of the general population in the United Kingdom to identify patients with epilepsy, depression, or bipolar disorder and to determine whether they received antiepileptic drugs. We estimated the incidence rate of suicide-related events and used logistic regression to compute odds ratios, controlling for confounding factors.

Results

In a cohort of 5,130,795 patients, the incidence of suicide-related events per 100,000 person-years was 15.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.6 to 15.5) among patients without epilepsy, depression, bipolar disorder, or antiepileptic-drug treatment, 38.2 (95% CI, 26.3 to 53.7) among patients with epilepsy who did not receive antiepileptic drugs, and 48.2 (95% CI, 39.4 to 58.5) among patients with epilepsy who received antiepileptic drugs. In adjusted analyses, the use of antiepileptic drugs was not associated with an increased risk of suicide-related events among patients with epilepsy (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.98) or bipolar disorder (1.13; 95% CI, 0.35 to 3.61) but was significantly associated with an increased risk among patients with depression (1.65; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.19) and those who did not have epilepsy, depression, or bipolar disorder (2.57; 95% CI, 1.78 to 3.71).

Conclusions

The current use of antiepileptic drugs was not associated with an increased risk of suicide-related events among patients with epilepsy, but it was associated with an increased risk of such events among patients with depression and among those who did not have epilepsy, depression, or bipolar disorder.

source:NEJM

Mixtard 30 – going, going, gone?


In June 2010, the drug company Novo Nordisk announced that its only conventional human biphasic insulin, human Mixtard 30, would no longer be available in the UK from January 2011, a decision that affects an estimated 90,000 patients. The alternative biphasic analogue insulins are more expensive than Mixtard 30. Assuming a direct swap to Novo Nordisk’s analogue biphasic insulin, NovoMix 30, the increased prescribing costs could be over £9million in England alone. This is quite apart from the extra resources needed to review patients to discuss and decide on alternative treatments, and the disruption and concern such changes may cause for affected individuals. The decision will also mean that biphasic insulin will no longer be available in the ergonomic InnoLet device. Switching to an alternative device could therefore leave many users who have poor eyesight or reduced manual dexterity dependent on others for their insulin administration. The withdrawal of Mixtard 30 will therefore have a major impact on patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare expenditure.

Novo Nordisk has said that it is committed to withdrawing all older types of human insulin over time. While its analogue insulins are marketed as ‘modern insulin’, published evidence shows that biphasic analogue insulins do not offer any advantage over conventional human biphasic insulins in terms of efficacy, long-term outcomes or safety. Yet there are over 50% more prescriptions for NovoMix 30 than for Mixtard 30. The popularity of NovoMix 30 is likely in part to reflect the usability of the FlexPen. And it is possible that the declining use of Mixtard 30 in the UK (the company’s stated basis for withdrawing the drug) could have been prevented if it had also been available in the FlexPen. Of note, in Germany, the same drug is available in the Flexpen (as Actraphane 30/70), and there appear to be no plans to withdraw it.

We urge all those with an interest in cost-effective prescribing to campaign with us against Novo Nordisk’s short-sighted decision. To find out more, and to sign our online petition, please go to our website (www.dtb.bmj.com).

Figure

source:BMJ

Salamander’s egg surprise


Scientists have stumbled across the first example of a photosynthetic organism living inside a vertebrate’s cells. The discovery is a surprise because the adaptive immune systems of vertebrates generally destroy foreign biological material. In this case, however, a symbiotic alga seems to be surviving unchallenged — and might be giving its host a solar-powered metabolic boost.

Algae cohabit with salamander embryos in their eggs &x2014; and inside their cells.Algae cohabit with salamander embryos in their eggs — and inside their cells.T. LEVIN/PHOTOLIBRARY.COM

The embryos of the spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) have long been known to enjoy a mutualistic relationship with the single-celled alga Oophila amblystomatis. The salamanders’ viridescent eggs are coloured by algae living in the jelly-like material that surrounds the embryo. The embryos produce nitrogen-rich waste that is useful to the algae, which, in turn, supply the developing embryos with extra oxygen. The algae clearly benefit their salamander hosts: Lynda Goff, a molecular marine biologist at the University of California, Santa Cruz, showed 30 years ago that salamander embryos lacking algae in their surrounding jelly are slower to hatch.

Ryan Kerney of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, has now found that these algae also live inside the embryo’s cells. Such a close coexistence with a photosynthetic organism has previously been found only in invertebrates, such as corals. Kerney took long-exposure fluorescent images of pre-hatchling salamander embryos, and saw scattered dots in the unstained tissue — an indicator that it might contain chlorophyll. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed mitochondria in the salamander cells clustering close to the algae. Reporting the discovery on 28 July at the Ninth International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology in Punta del Este, Kerney suggested that the mitochondria might be taking advantage of both oxygen and carbohydrate generated by the alga’s photosynthesis.

So when do the algae enter the embryos’ cells? A time-lapse video made by Roger Hangarter at Indiana University in Bloomington, and presented by Kerney at the meeting, reveals a fluorescent green flash — an algal bloom — next to each embryo just as its nervous system begins to form. Most research on spotted salamander embryos has focused on earlier periods of development, which might explain why algae have not been seen inside the cells before.

One of Kerney’s most curious discoveries suggests that the algae may be a maternal gift. He has found the same algae in the oviducts of adult female spotted salamanders, where the embryo-encompassing jelly sacs first form.

SOURCE:NATURE

David Wake, an emeritus professor at the University of California,
Berkeley, who watched Kerney’s presentation, wonders whether algae could
be getting into the reproductive cells. This would “really challenge
the dogma” that vertebrates’ immune systems ban such close
relationships, he says. Both Wake and David Buckley, who studies
salamander development at the National Museum of Natural Sciences in
Madrid, agree that the work might tell us more about how vertebrate
cells learn to identify intruders.
“It makes me wonder if other species of salamander that have known
symbiotic relationships with algae also harbour algae inside their
cells,” adds Daniel Buchholz, a developmental biologist at the
University of Cincinnati in Ohio. “I think that if people start looking
we may see many more examples.”

Diurnal blood pressure variation, risk categories and antihypertensive treatment


Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is a useful tool aiding diagnostic and management decisions in patients with hypertension. Diurnal BP variation or circadian rhythm adds prognostic value to the absolute BP elevation. The Spanish ABPM Registry has collected information from >30 000 treated hypertensive patients attended by either primary care physicians or referral specialists. The analysis of BP diurnal variation has allowed the conclusion that nocturnal BP decline is related to the level of risk. Patients with blunted nocturnal dip frequently belong to high- or very high-risk categories and specifically are often older, obese, diabetics or with overt cardiovascular or renal disease. With respect to treatment, the non-dipper profile is more often observed in patients receiving several antihypertensive drug agents, but it does not correlate with the time of drug administration. Among patients receiving only one drug, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and α-blockers are associated with less nocturnal BP decline than other antihypertensive drug classes, even after adjusting for the level of risk.

source: nature cardiology

Unique combinations of cells and mutations lie at the heart of cancer subgroup revealed for the first time in a pediatric brain tumor


Scientists have long recognized that cancers may look the same under the microscope, but carry different mutations, respond differently to treatment and result in vastly different outcomes for patients. An international team led by St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital scientists has developed a new approach that uses genomic information from different species to understand the biology that drives the formation of these different cancer subtypes.

The approach was developed by studying a tumor called ependymoma that affects the brains and spines of children and adults, but may also translate to other forms of cancer. The research demonstrates for the first time that ependymomas in different regions of the nervous system arise when subtypes of stem cells found there acquire specific mutations. The research also led to discovery of the first gene, called EPHB2, proven to cause ependymoma and has created the first accurate laboratory model of this disease. The research was published in the advance online publication of the prominent scientific journal Nature and is authored by Richard Gilbertson, M.D., Ph.D., a member of the St. Jude Departments of Developmental Neurobiology and Oncology.

“The approach we have developed provides a flexible way for scientists around the world to test the hypothesis that subsets of different cancers arise when particular mutations occur in particular cell types,” Gilbertson said. “Because the laboratory models developed from this approach accurately model patient subgroups, they can then be used to develop and tailor effective new treatments for these patients.”

The project builds on earlier work from Gilbertson’s laboratory into the role that normal stem cells play in cancer. The body relies on stem cells, which can divide and take on more specialized functions, to keep organs repaired and operating smoothly. The research included scientists from seven institutions in the U.S., Canada and Great Britain.

For this study, investigators gathered 204 ependymomas from patients in the U.S., Canada and Europe to conduct the most comprehensive analysis yet of the ependymoma genome. Researchers found the pattern of DNA gain or loss differed depending on the ependymoma’s location in the brain or spine and uncovered nine subtypes of the disease. The analysis also identified more than 200 genes as potentially important for triggering the tumor or helping the cancer spread. The list included EPHB2, a gene that regulates stem cell division and was recently linked to intestinal tumors. In this study, investigators linked EPHB2 to just one ependymoma subtype.

Researchers also tracked the different stem cell populations that give rise to ependymomas. Using an algorithm developed by Stanley Pounds, Ph.D., associate member in the St. Jude Department of Biostatistics, researchers compared patterns of gene expression in human ependymomas with gene expression in stem cells from different regions of the nervous systems of both embryonic and adult mice. The mathematical tool made it possible for the first time to compare global gene expression patterns between species.

The exercise linked one subtype of the human cancer with a particular subpopulation of mouse nervous system or neural stem cells. The stem cells also lacked the tumor suppressor genes Ink4a/Arf. When extra copies of EPHB2 were added to those neural stem cells and the cells were implanted in the forebrains of mice, half the mice developed brain tumors within 200 days. Scientists went on to show the tumors were identical to human ependymomas by several different measures. In contrast, no ependymomas developed when extra copies of EPHB2 were inserted into other subpopulations of mouse neural stem cells.

Additional testing found that the mouse ependymoma model matched just one subtype of human ependymomas but no other form of common human brain tumors.

The study’s other authors are Robert Johnson, Karen Wright, Helen Poppleton, Kumarasamypet Mohankumar, David Finkelstein, Elsie White, Christopher Eden, Twala Hogg, Geoffrey Neale, Yong-Dong Wang, Jennifer Atkinson, Mariko DeWire, Tanya Kranenburg, Thomas Merchant, Fredrick Boop, Robert Sanford, Amar Gajjar and David Ellison, all of St. Jude; Vikki Rand, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.; Sarah Leary, Seattle Children’s Hospital; Paul Northcott, Stephen Mack and Michael Taylor, all of the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Beth Coyle and Richard Grundy, both of the University of Nottingham, U.K.; Yancey Gillespie, University of Alabama, Birmingham; and Jeffrey Allen, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York.

The work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, the Collaborative Ependymoma Research Network and ALSAC.